Evaluating Panitumumab (ABX-EGF) Plus Best Supportive Care Versus Best Supportive Care in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
An Open-label, Randomized, Phase 3 Clinical Trial of ABX-EGF Plus Best Supportive Care Versus Best Supportive Care in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
463
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine that panitumumab, using the proposed regimen, will safely increase progression free survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who have failed available treatment options (i.e., patients who developed progressive disease or relapsed while on or after prior fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan and oxaliplatin chemotherapy).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3 colorectal-cancer
Started Jan 2004
Typical duration for phase_3 colorectal-cancer
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 10, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 13, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 3, 2014
CompletedNovember 7, 2022
November 1, 2022
4.8 years
June 10, 2005
August 6, 2010
November 4, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Progression-free Survival Time
Kaplan-Meier estimates of median time from randomization to either death or first observed disease progression, whichever occurred first. Participants were evaluated for tumor response according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) based on the response assessment from a blinded review of radiographic scans by the Independent Review Committee. Progressive disease defined as least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters (SLD) of target lesions, taking as reference the nadir SLD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions, or the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.
From randomization to the data cut-off date of 30 June 2005. The median follow-up time was 20.0 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 18.2 weeks in the BSC alone group.
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Overall Survival
From randomization until the data cut-off date for overall survival of 15 March 2006. The median actual follow-up time was 30 weeks for the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31 weeks for the BSC alone group.
Objective Tumor Response
From randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time was 29.6 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31.8 weeks in the BSC alone group.
Duration of Response
From randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time was 29.6 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31.8 weeks in the BSC alone group.
Time to Response
From randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time was 29.6 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31.8 weeks in the BSC alone group.
Time to Disease Progression
From randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time was 29.6 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31.8 weeks in the BSC alone group.
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Panitumumab plus best supportive care
EXPERIMENTALPanitumumab will be administered by intravenous infusion at a dose of 6 mg/kg once every 2 weeks until participants develop progressive disease or are unable to tolerate study drug. Participants will also receive best supportive care (BSC) as judged appropriate by the investigator and according to institutional guidelines.
Best Supportive Care
OTHERBest supportive care will be defined in this study as the best care available as judged appropriate by the investigator and according to institutional guidelines and will include antibiotics, analgesics, radiation therapy for pain control (limited to bone metastases), corticosteroids, transfusions, psychotherapy, growth factors, palliative surgery, or any symptomatic therapy as clinically indicated. For the purpose of this study, best supportive care will not include anti-neoplastic chemotherapy.
Interventions
Best supportive care as site routine excluding: antineoplastic chemotherapy, investigational agents, anti-EGFr(Epidermal growth factor receptor) targeting agents other than ABX-EGF(Panitumumab), experimental or approved anti-tumor therapies (e.g. Avastin), chemotherapy, radiotherapy (with the exception of radiotherapy for pain control limited to bone metastases).
Intravenous infusion at a dose of 6 mg/kg once every 2 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Pathologic diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma (diagnostic tissue obtained by tissue biopsy)
- Metastatic colorectal carcinoma
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1 or 2
- Documented evidence of disease progression during, or following treatment, with fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan and oxaliplatin chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer
- Radiographic documentation of disease progression during or within 6 months following the most recent chemotherapy regimen
- Unidimensionally measurable disease
- Tumor expressing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr) by immunohistochemistry
- At least 2 but not more than 3 prior chemotherapy regimens for colorectal cancer
- Adequate hematologic, renal and hepatic function
You may not qualify if:
- Symptomatic brain metastases requiring treatment
- History or evidence of interstitial pneumonitis or pulmonary fibrosis
- Use of systemic chemotherapy or radiotherapy within 30 days prior to enrollment
- Prior epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr) targeting therapies
- Prior anti-tumor therapies including prior experimental agents or approved anti-tumor small molecules and biologics of short (less than a week) serum half life within 30 days before enrollment, or prior experimental or approved proteins within 3 months before enrollment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Amgenlead
Related Publications (11)
Bai JP, Bell R, Buckman S, Burckart GJ, Eichler HG, Fang KC, Goodsaid FM, Jusko WJ, Lesko LL, Meibohm B, Patterson SD, Puig O, Smerage JB, Snider BJ, Wagner JA, Wang J, Walton MK, Weiner R. Translational biomarkers: from preclinical to clinical a report of 2009 AAPS/ACCP Biomarker Workshop. AAPS J. 2011 Jun;13(2):274-83. doi: 10.1208/s12248-011-9265-x. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
PMID: 21448748BACKGROUNDOdom D, Barber B, Bennett L, Peeters M, Zhao Z, Kaye J, Wolf M, Wiezorek J. Health-related quality of life and colorectal cancer-specific symptoms in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic disease treated with panitumumab. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011 Feb;26(2):173-81. doi: 10.1007/s00384-010-1112-5. Epub 2010 Dec 29.
PMID: 21190026BACKGROUNDPeeters M, Siena S, Van Cutsem E, Sobrero A, Hendlisz A, Cascinu S, Kalofonos H, Devercelli G, Wolf M, Amado RG. Association of progression-free survival, overall survival, and patient-reported outcomes by skin toxicity and KRAS status in patients receiving panitumumab monotherapy. Cancer. 2009 Apr 1;115(7):1544-54. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24088.
PMID: 19189371BACKGROUNDSiena S, Peeters M, Van Cutsem E, Humblet Y, Conte P, Bajetta E, Comandini D, Bodoky G, Van Hazel G, Salek T, Wolf M, Devercelli G, Woolley M, Amado RG. Association of progression-free survival with patient-reported outcomes and survival: results from a randomised phase 3 trial of panitumumab. Br J Cancer. 2007 Dec 3;97(11):1469-74. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604053. Epub 2007 Nov 27.
PMID: 18040272BACKGROUNDVan Cutsem E, Peeters M, Siena S, Humblet Y, Hendlisz A, Neyns B, Canon JL, Van Laethem JL, Maurel J, Richardson G, Wolf M, Amado RG. Open-label phase III trial of panitumumab plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care alone in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007 May 1;25(13):1658-64. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.1620.
PMID: 17470858BACKGROUNDSafari M, Esmaeili H, Mahjub H, Roshanaei G. Estimation of treatment effect in presence of noncompliance and competing risks: a simulation study. Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 18;13(1):13477. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40538-2.
PMID: 37596461DERIVEDLiao MZ, Prenen H, Dutta S, Upreti VV. The impact of hepatic and renal function on panitumumab exposures in patients with metastatic RAS wild-type colorectal cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2021 Oct;88(4):665-672. doi: 10.1007/s00280-021-04319-w. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
PMID: 34213592DERIVEDBoeckx N, Koukakis R, Op de Beeck K, Rolfo C, Van Camp G, Siena S, Tabernero J, Douillard JY, Andre T, Peeters M. Effect of Primary Tumor Location on Second- or Later-line Treatment Outcomes in Patients With RAS Wild-type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer and All Treatment Lines in Patients With RAS Mutations in Four Randomized Panitumumab Studies. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2018 Sep;17(3):170-178.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2018.03.005. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
PMID: 29627309DERIVEDPeeters M, Kafatos G, Taylor A, Gastanaga VM, Oliner KS, Hechmati G, Terwey JH, van Krieken JH. Prevalence of RAS mutations and individual variation patterns among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A pooled analysis of randomised controlled trials. Eur J Cancer. 2015 Sep;51(13):1704-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.05.017. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
PMID: 26049686DERIVEDPoulin-Costello M, Azoulay L, Van Cutsem E, Peeters M, Siena S, Wolf M. An analysis of the treatment effect of panitumumab on overall survival from a phase 3, randomized, controlled, multicenter trial (20020408) in patients with chemotherapy refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Target Oncol. 2013 Jun;8(2):127-36. doi: 10.1007/s11523-013-0271-z. Epub 2013 Apr 27.
PMID: 23625191DERIVEDAmado RG, Wolf M, Peeters M, Van Cutsem E, Siena S, Freeman DJ, Juan T, Sikorski R, Suggs S, Radinsky R, Patterson SD, Chang DD. Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Apr 1;26(10):1626-34. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.7116. Epub 2008 Mar 3.
PMID: 18316791DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Study Director
- Organization
- Amgen Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
MD
Amgen
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 10, 2005
First Posted
June 13, 2005
Study Start
January 1, 2004
Primary Completion
October 1, 2008
Study Completion
June 1, 2009
Last Updated
November 7, 2022
Results First Posted
January 3, 2014
Record last verified: 2022-11