Panitumumab (ABX-EGF) Monotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
A Phase 2 Multicenter Single Arm Clinical Trial of ABX-EGF Monotherapy in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Whose Tumors Express Low or Negative EGFr Levels of Immunohistochemistry Following Treatment With Fluoropyrimidine, Irinotecan, and Oxaliplatin Chemotherapy
1 other identifier
interventional
203
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine that panitumumab will have clinically meaningful anti-tumor activity in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who have developed progressive disease or relapsed while on or after prior fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan and oxaliplatin chemotherapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2 colorectal-cancer
Started Aug 2004
Typical duration for phase_2 colorectal-cancer
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 9, 2004
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 11, 2004
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 5, 2013
CompletedNovember 7, 2022
November 1, 2022
2.4 years
August 9, 2004
August 6, 2010
November 3, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Objective Tumor Response Through Week 16
Confirmed objective tumor response was defined as a complete response or partial response from enrollment through Week 16. Tumor response was monitored, beginning at Week 8, per a modified version of the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for tumor response and progression by an independent review committee central assessment. Complete response was defined per modified WHO criteria as disappearance of all lesions (index and non-index). Partial response was defined as ≥ 50% decrease from Baseline in the sum of the products of the longest diameters (SPD) of index lesions. Scans were required to confirm a complete or partial response no earlier than 4 weeks from the time a response of complete or partial response was first documented.
From enrollment through Week 16
Duration of Response
Kaplan-Meier estimate of time time from first objective response to first observed progression of disease or death if the death was due to disease progression (whichever comes first) among participants who had a response at any time on study. Participants who responded and did not progress while on study or who died for reasons other than disease progression while on study were censored at their last evaluable assessment date.
From enrollment until the data cut-off date of 22 December 2006. The median follow-up time was 36 weeks.
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Objective Tumor Response Throughout the Study
From enrollment until the data cut-off date of 22 December 2006. The median follow-up time was 36 weeks.
Time to Initial Objective Response
From enrollment until the data cut-off date of 22 December 2006. The median follow-up time was 36 weeks.
Progression-free Survival Time
From enrollment until the data cut-off date of 22 December 2006. The median follow-up time was 36 weeks.
Time to Disease Progression
From enrollment until the data cut-off date of 22 December 2006. The median follow-up time was 36 weeks.
Time to Treatment Failure
From enrollment until the data cut-off date of 22 December 2006. The median follow-up time was 36 weeks.
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Panitumumab
EXPERIMENTALPanitumumab was administered by intravenous (IV) infusion at a dose of 6 mg/kg once every 2 weeks until participants developed progressive disease, were unable to tolerate investigational product, or discontinued for other reasons.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Pathologic diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma (diagnostic tissue obtained by tissue biopsy)
- Metastatic colorectal carcinoma
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group of 0, 1 or 2
- Documented evidence of disease progression during, or following treatment, with fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan and oxaliplatin chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer
- Radiographic documentation of disease progression during or within 6 months following the most recent chemotherapy regimen is required
- Bidimensionally measurable disease
- Tumor expressing low to negative levels of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr) by immunohistochemistry
- At least 2 but no more than 3 prior chemotherapy regimens for metastatic colorectal cancer
- Adequate hematologic, renal and hepatic function
You may not qualify if:
- Symptomatic brain metastases requiring treatment
- Patient with a history of interstitial pneumonitis or pulmonary fibrosis or evidence of interstitial pneumonitis or pulmonary fibrosis
- Use of systemic chemotherapy or radiotherapy within 30 days before enrollment
- Prior anti-EGFr antibody therapy with the exception of the small molecule EGFr tyrosine kinase inhibitors, which are permitted
- Prior anti-tumor therapies including prior experimental agents or approved anti-tumor small molecules and biologics of short (less than 1 week) serum half-life within 30 days before enrollment, or prior experimental or approved proteins within 6 weeks before enrollment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Amgenlead
Related Publications (1)
Liao MZ, Prenen H, Dutta S, Upreti VV. The impact of hepatic and renal function on panitumumab exposures in patients with metastatic RAS wild-type colorectal cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2021 Oct;88(4):665-672. doi: 10.1007/s00280-021-04319-w. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
PMID: 34213592DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Study Director
- Organization
- Amgen Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
MD
Amgen
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 9, 2004
First Posted
August 11, 2004
Study Start
August 1, 2004
Primary Completion
January 1, 2007
Study Completion
August 1, 2008
Last Updated
November 7, 2022
Results First Posted
December 5, 2013
Record last verified: 2022-11