Irinotecan With or Without Panitumumab or Cyclosporine in Treating Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer That Did Not Respond to Fluorouracil
A Randomised Clinical Trial of Treatment for Fluorouracil-Resistant Advanced Colorectal Cancer Comparing Standard Single-Agent Irinotecan Versus Irinotecan Plus Panitumumab and Versus Irinotecan Plus Ciclosporin [Panitumumab, Irinotecan & Ciclosporin in COLOrectal Cancer Therapy (PICCOLO)]
6 other identifiers
interventional
1,198
1 country
33
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as irinotecan, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Cyclosporine may help irinotecan work better by making tumor cells more sensitive to the drug. Monoclonal antibodies, such as panitumumab, can block tumor growth in different ways. Some block the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Others find tumor cells and help kill them or carry tumor-killing substances to them. Panitumumab may also stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. It is not yet known whether irinotecan is more effective when given with or without panitumumab or cyclosporine in treating colorectal cancer. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying irinotecan to compare how well it works when given with or without panitumumab or cyclosporine in treating patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer that did not respond to fluorouracil.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3 colorectal-cancer
33 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 18, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 19, 2006
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2006
CompletedJune 1, 2022
May 1, 2022
October 18, 2006
May 26, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Proportion of patients treated with irinotecan hydrochloride (Ir) alone vs Ir and cyclosporine (IrC) who are progression-free at 12 weeks
Overall survival of patients treated with Ir vs Ir and panitumumab (IrP) and no prior cetuximab
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Proportion of patients free from treatment failure at 12 weeks in patients treated with Ir vs IrC
Overall survival in patients treated with Ir vs IrC
Nurse-assessed toxicity (all-cause mortality, diarrhea ≥ grade 3 at 12 weeks) in patients treated with Ir vs IrC
Progression-free at 12 weeks in patients treated with Ir vs IrP and no prior cetuximab
Nurse assessed toxicity (all-cause mortality) in patients treated with Ir vs IrP and no prior cetuximab
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (33)
Royal Bournemouth Hospital
Bournemouth, England, BH7 7DW, United Kingdom
Sussex Cancer Centre at Royal Sussex County Hospital
Brighton, England, BN2 5BE, United Kingdom
Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre
Bristol, England, BS2 8ED, United Kingdom
Addenbrooke's Hospital
Cambridge, England, CB2 2QQ, United Kingdom
Gloucestershire Oncology Centre at Cheltenham General Hospital
Cheltenham, England, GL53 7AN, United Kingdom
Eastbourne District General Hospital
Eastbourne, England, BN21 2UD, United Kingdom
St. Luke's Cancer Centre at Royal Surrey County Hospital
Guildford, England, GU2 7XX, United Kingdom
Huddersfield Royal Infirmary
Huddersfield, West Yorks, England, HD3 3EA, United Kingdom
Hinchingbrooke Hospital
Huntingdon, England, PE18 6NT, United Kingdom
Airedale General Hospital
Keighley, England, BD20 6TD, United Kingdom
Cookridge Hospital
Leeds, England, LS16 6QB, United Kingdom
Royal Liverpool University Hospital
Liverpool, England, L7 8XP, United Kingdom
UCL Cancer Institute
London, England, NW3 2PF, United Kingdom
Queen Elizabeth Hospital - Woolwich
London, England, SE18 4QH, United Kingdom
St. Mary's Hospital
London, England, W2 1NY, United Kingdom
Mid Kent Oncology Centre at Maidstone Hospital
Maidstone, England, ME16 9QQ, United Kingdom
Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology
Merseyside, England, CH63 4JY, United Kingdom
James Cook University Hospital
Middlesbrough, England, TS4 3BW, United Kingdom
Mount Vernon Cancer Centre at Mount Vernon Hospital
Northwood, England, HA6 2RN, United Kingdom
Peterborough Hospitals Trust
Peterborough, England, PE3 6DA, United Kingdom
Dorset Cancer Centre
Poole Dorset, England, BH15 2JB, United Kingdom
Portsmouth Oncology Centre at Saint Mary's Hospital
Portsmouth Hants, England, PO3 6AD, United Kingdom
Cancer Research Centre at Weston Park Hospital
Sheffield, England, S10 2SJ, United Kingdom
South Tyneside District Hospital
South Shields, England, NE34 0PL, United Kingdom
Royal Marsden - Surrey
Sutton, England, SM2 5PT, United Kingdom
Great Western Hospital
Swindon, England, SN3 6BB, United Kingdom
Worthing Hospital
Worthing, England, BN11 2DH, United Kingdom
Yeovil District Hospital
Yeovil, England, BA21 4AT, United Kingdom
Edinburgh Cancer Centre at Western General Hospital
Edinburgh, Scotland, EH4 2XU, United Kingdom
Ysbyty Gwynedd
Bangor, Wales, LL57 2PW, United Kingdom
Velindre Cancer Center at Velindre Hospital
Cardiff, Wales, CF14 2TL, United Kingdom
Glan Clwyd Hospital
Rhyl, Denbighshire, Wales, LL 18 5UJ, United Kingdom
South West Wales Cancer Institute
Swansea, Wales, SA2 8QA, United Kingdom
Related Publications (3)
Seymour MT, Brown SR, Middleton G, Maughan T, Richman S, Gwyther S, Lowe C, Seligmann JF, Wadsley J, Maisey N, Chau I, Hill M, Dawson L, Falk S, O'Callaghan A, Benstead K, Chambers P, Oliver A, Marshall H, Napp V, Quirke P. Panitumumab and irinotecan versus irinotecan alone for patients with KRAS wild-type, fluorouracil-resistant advanced colorectal cancer (PICCOLO): a prospectively stratified randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jul;14(8):749-59. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70163-3. Epub 2013 May 29.
PMID: 23725851RESULTMiddleton G, Brown S, Lowe C, Maughan T, Gwyther S, Oliver A, Richman S, Blake D, Napp V, Marshall H, Wadsley J, Maisey N, Chau I, Hill M, Gollins S, Myint S, Slater S, Wagstaff J, Bridgewater J, Seymour M. A randomised phase III trial of the pharmacokinetic biomodulation of irinotecan using oral ciclosporin in advanced colorectal cancer: results of the Panitumumab, Irinotecan & Ciclosporin in COLOrectal cancer therapy trial (PICCOLO). Eur J Cancer. 2013 Nov;49(16):3507-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.06.017. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
PMID: 23953030RESULTSeligmann JF, Elliott F, Richman SD, Jacobs B, Hemmings G, Brown S, Barrett JH, Tejpar S, Quirke P, Seymour MT. Combined Epiregulin and Amphiregulin Expression Levels as a Predictive Biomarker for Panitumumab Therapy Benefit or Lack of Benefit in Patients With RAS Wild-Type Advanced Colorectal Cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2016 May 1;2(5):633-642. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.6065.
PMID: 26867820RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Matthew T. Seymour, MA, MD, FRCP
Cookridge Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 18, 2006
First Posted
October 19, 2006
Study Start
December 1, 2006
Last Updated
June 1, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-05