Temozolomide Alone or in Combination With Thalidomide and/or Isotretinoin and/or Celecoxib in Treating Patients Who Have Undergone Radiation Therapy for Glioblastoma Multiforme
A Randomized, Factorial-Design, Phase II Trial of Temozolomide Alone and in Combination With Possible Permutations of Thalidomide, Isotretinoin and/or Celecoxib as Post-Radiation Adjuvant Therapy of Glioblastoma Multiforme
6 other identifiers
interventional
178
1 country
12
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as temozolomide, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Thalidomide may stop the growth of glioblastoma multiforme by blocking blood flow to the tumor. Isotretinoin may help cells that are involved in the body's immune response to work better. Celecoxib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. It is not yet known which temozolomide-containing regimen is more effective in treating glioblastoma multiforme. PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying eight different temozolomide-containing regimens to compare how well they work in treating patients who have undergone radiation therapy for glioblastoma multiforme.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Sep 2005
Longer than P75 for phase_2
12 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 2, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 3, 2005
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 18, 2021
CompletedOctober 18, 2021
September 1, 2021
9 years
June 2, 2005
August 11, 2020
September 21, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Comparison of Thalidomide Arms Versus no Thalidomide Arms
Thalidomide versus not Thalidomide analysis: Comparison of median PFS outcome of participants in arms II, VI, VII and VIII, versus participants in arms I, III, IV and V. Median PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method from time of randomization to time of progression, death, or last follow-up. Progression defined as 25% increase in the sum of products of all measurable lesions over smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease) using the same techniques as baseline, OR clear worsening of any evaluable disease, OR appearance of any new lesion/site, OR failure to return for evaluation due to death or deteriorating condition (unless clearly unrelated to this cancer).
Every 2 cycles (1 cycle = 28 days) from randomization until progression of disease, death or last follow-up, up to one year (12 study cycles).
Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Comparison of Celecoxib Arms Versus no Celecoxib Arms
Celecoxib versus not Celecoxib analysis: We compared the median PFS outcome of participants in arms III, V, VI and VIII, versus participants in arms I, II, IV and VII. Median PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method from time of randomization to time of progression, death, or last follow-up. Progression defined as 25% increase in the sum of products of all measurable lesions over smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease) using the same techniques as baseline, OR clear worsening of any evaluable disease, OR appearance of any new lesion/site, OR failure to return for evaluation due to death or deteriorating condition (unless clearly unrelated to this cancer).
Every 2 cycles (1 cycle = 28 days) from randomization until progression of disease, death or last follow-up.
Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Comparison of Isotretinoin Arms Versus no Isotretinoin Arms
Isotretinoin versus not Isotretinoin analysis: We compared the median PFS outcome of participants in arms IV, V, VII and VIII, versus participants in arms I, II, III and VI. Median PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method from time of randomization to time of progression, death, or last follow-up. Progression defined as 25% increase in the sum of products of all measurable lesions over smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease) using the same techniques as baseline, OR clear worsening of any evaluable disease, OR appearance of any new lesion/site, OR failure to return for evaluation due to death or deteriorating condition (unless clearly unrelated to this cancer).
Every 2 cycles (1 cycle = 28 days) from randomization until progression of disease, death or last follow-up.
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Comparison of Doublet Versus Triplet Therapy
Every 2 cycles (1 cycle = 28 days) from randomization until progression of disease, death or last follow-up.
Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) of Individual Arms
Every 2 cycles (1 cycle = 28 days) from randomization until progression of disease, death or last follow-up.
Median Overall Survival (OS) Comparison of Thalidomide Arms Versus no Thalidomide Arms
Every 3 months from randomization until progression of disease, death or last follow-up.
Median Overall Survival (OS) Comparison of Celecoxib Arms Versus no Celecoxib Arms
Every 3 months from randomization until progression of disease, death or last follow-up.
Median Overall Survival (OS) Comparison of Isotretinoin Arms Versus no Isotretinoin Arms
Every 3 months from randomization until progression of disease, death or last follow-up.
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (8)
Arm I: TMZ
ACTIVE COMPARATOROral Temozolomide (TMZ) 150 mg/m\^2 once daily on days 1-7 and 15-21.
Arm II: TMZ + Thalidomide
EXPERIMENTALTemozolomide as in arm I and oral Thalidomide (Thal) once daily on days 1-28 (starting dose 200 mg).
Arm III: TMZ + Isotretinoin
EXPERIMENTALTemozolomide as in Arm I and oral Isotretinoin 40 mg/m\^2 twice daily on days 1-21.
Arm IV: TMZ + Celecoxib
EXPERIMENTALTemozolomide as in arm I and oral Celecoxib 400 mg twice daily on days 1-28.
Arm V: TMZ + Thalidomide + Isotretinoin
EXPERIMENTALTemozolomide as in arm I, Thalidomide as in arm II, and Isotretinoin as in arm III.
Arm VI: TMZ + Thalidomide + Celecoxib
EXPERIMENTALTemozolomide as in Arm I, Thalidomide as in Arm II, and Celecoxib as in Arm IV.
Arm VII: TMZ + Isotretinoin + Celecoxib
EXPERIMENTALTemozolomide as in Arm I, Isotretinoin as in Arm III, and Celecoxib as in Arm IV.
Arm VIII: TMZ + Thalidomide + Isotretinoin + Celecoxib
EXPERIMENTALTemozolomide as in Arm I, Thalidomide as in Arm II, Isotretinoin as in Arm III, and Celecoxib as in Arm IV.
Interventions
400 mg orally twice a day continuous dosing
40 mg/m\^2 orally twice a day (total daily dose = 80 mg/m\^2) days 1-21 of a 28 day cycle.
150 mg/m2 orally daily, 7 days on treatment, 7 days off.
400 mg orally every day continuous dosing (starting at 200 mg each day and escalating weekly by 100 mg until the maximum dose of 400 mg/day is achieved)
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Centerlead
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
Study Sites (12)
Hembree Mercy Cancer Center at St. Edward Mercy Medical Center
Fort Smith, Arkansas, 72913, United States
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center at Orlando
Orlando, Florida, 32806-2134, United States
CCOP - Atlanta Regional
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342-1701, United States
CCOP - Central Illinois
Decatur, Illinois, 62526, United States
CCOP - Wichita
Wichita, Kansas, 67214-3882, United States
CCOP - Grand Rapids
Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49503, United States
CCOP - Kalamazoo
Kalamazoo, Michigan, 49007-3731, United States
CCOP - Kansas City
Kansas City, Missouri, 64131, United States
Cancer Research for the Ozarks
Springfield, Missouri, 65804, United States
Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute at Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210-1240, United States
CCOP - Upstate Carolina
Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29303, United States
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030-4009, United States
Related Publications (2)
Gilbert MR, Gonzalez J, Hunter K, Hess K, Giglio P, Chang E, Puduvalli V, Groves MD, Colman H, Conrad C, Levin V, Woo S, Mahajan A, de Groot J, Yung WK. A phase I factorial design study of dose-dense temozolomide alone and in combination with thalidomide, isotretinoin, and/or celecoxib as postchemoradiation adjuvant therapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 2010 Nov;12(11):1167-72. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noq100. Epub 2010 Aug 20.
PMID: 20729242RESULTPenas-Prado M, Hess KR, Fisch MJ, Lagrone LW, Groves MD, Levin VA, De Groot JF, Puduvalli VK, Colman H, Volas-Redd G, Giglio P, Conrad CA, Salacz ME, Floyd JD, Loghin ME, Hsu SH, Gonzalez J, Chang EL, Woo SY, Mahajan A, Aldape KD, Yung WK, Gilbert MR; MD Anderson Community Clinical Oncology Program; Brain Tumor Trials Collaborative. Randomized phase II adjuvant factorial study of dose-dense temozolomide alone and in combination with isotretinoin, celecoxib, and/or thalidomide for glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 2015 Feb;17(2):266-73. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nou155. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
PMID: 25239666DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- John F de Groot, Chair Ad Interim, Neuro-Oncology
- Organization
- The University of Texas (UT) MD Anderson Cancer Center
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Marta Penas-Prado, MD
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 2, 2005
First Posted
June 3, 2005
Study Start
September 1, 2005
Primary Completion
September 1, 2014
Study Completion
September 1, 2014
Last Updated
October 18, 2021
Results First Posted
October 18, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-09