Gemcitabine and Docetaxel in Treating Patients With Recurrent Osteosarcoma (Closed to Accrual as of 12/21/06) or Ewing's Sarcoma or Unresectable or Locally Recurrent Chondrosarcoma
Phase II Study Of Sequential Gemcitabine Followed By Docetaxel For Recurrent Ewing's Sarcoma, Osteosarcoma, Or Unresectable Or Locally Recurrent Chondrosarcoma [SARC Study]
1 other identifier
interventional
54
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine and docetaxel, work in different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining gemcitabine with docetaxel may kill more tumor cells. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of combining gemcitabine with docetaxel in treating patients who have recurrent osteosarcoma, recurrent Ewing's sarcoma, or unresectable or locally recurrent chondrosarcoma.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Oct 2006
Typical duration for phase_2
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 10, 2003
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 11, 2003
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 12, 2012
CompletedMarch 12, 2012
February 1, 2012
3.3 years
December 10, 2003
March 15, 2011
February 8, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Objective Response Rate
Patients will be evaluated up to 4 time points(after 2,4,8 and 12 cycles of therapy), each cycle is 21 days. Per RECIST 1.0 and assessed by CT/MRI disease status will be categorized as R=CR/PR(response), F=progressive disease or death(failure), or S(stable disease=neither R nor F) based on the change from baseline. A patient with outcome R or F at any stage is scored as having that overall outcome, a patient with outcome S is re-evaluated after subsequent cycles of therapy. Patients who receive more than 14 cycles of therapy will be scored as the outcome at completion of cycle 14.
After 2, 4, 8 and 12 cycles of therapy, each cycle is 21 days
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Time to Progression
post-cycle 2, 4, 8 and 12
Toxicity as Assessed by NCI CTCAE v3.0
Throughout the study
Pharmacokinetics of Gemcitabine Alone and Gemcitabine Followed by Docetaxel at Protocol Specified Timeframe in Participants Enrolled on Study
Gemcitibine: 0hr, 75, 85, 95, 105 and 120 min after the start of the 90 minute infusion; docetaxel: 0hr, 55 min, 30 min post infusion, 5hr and 24hr post infusion.
Interventions
filgrastim
pegfilgrastim
docetaxel
gemcitabine hydrochloride
microarray analysis
laboratory biomarker analysis
pharmacokinetic study
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (2)
Kilgour-Christie J, Czarnecki A: Pulmonary adverse drug reactions in patients treated with gemcitabine and a combination of gemcitabine and a taxane. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 23 (Suppl 16): A-8274, 796s, 2005.
BACKGROUNDFox E, Patel S, Wathen JK, Schuetze S, Chawla S, Harmon D, Reinke D, Chugh R, Benjamin RS, Helman LJ. Phase II study of sequential gemcitabine followed by docetaxel for recurrent Ewing sarcoma, osteosarcoma, or unresectable or locally recurrent chondrosarcoma: results of Sarcoma Alliance for Research Through Collaboration Study 003. Oncologist. 2012;17(3):321. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0265. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
PMID: 22363068DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Since this design did not specify a rule for declaring the treatment as "active" a direct comparison to a standard 2 stage phase 2 design is not appropriate.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- SARC Chief Operating Officer
- Organization
- SARC
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shreyaskumar R. Patel, MD
Sarcoma Alliance for Research through Collaboration
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Elizabeth Fox, MD
Sarcoma Alliance for Research through Collaboration
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 10, 2003
First Posted
December 11, 2003
Study Start
October 1, 2006
Primary Completion
January 1, 2010
Study Completion
December 1, 2010
Last Updated
March 12, 2012
Results First Posted
March 12, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-02