S0232 Dexamethasone With or Without Lenalidomide in Treating Patients With Previously Untreated Stage I, Stage II, or Stage III Multiple Myeloma
Phase III Trial Comparing Dexamethasone (DEX) to the Combination of DEX + CC-5013 in Patients With Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma
2 other identifiers
interventional
198
1 country
2
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy such as dexamethasone use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Lenalidomide may stop the growth of multiple myeloma by stopping blood flow to the tumor. It is not yet known whether dexamethasone is more effective with or without lenalidomide in treating multiple myeloma. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying dexamethasone and lenalidomide to see how well they work compared to dexamethasone alone in treating patients with previously untreated stage I, stage II, or stage III multiple myeloma.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3 multiple-myeloma
Started Nov 2004
Typical duration for phase_3 multiple-myeloma
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 8, 2003
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 9, 2003
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2004
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 17, 2013
CompletedMarch 25, 2015
March 1, 2015
3.9 years
July 8, 2003
November 19, 2012
March 5, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Progression-Free Survival
Progression is defined as a \> 25% increase from baseline in myeloma protein production or other signs of disease progression such as hypercalcemia, etc. In patients with a confirmed Partial Remission, Remission, or Complete Remission, relapse is defined as the first occurrence of any of the following: 1) a myeloma protein increase by than 100% from the lowest level recorded on study, provided the absolute magnitude of this increase is at least 1g/dL for a serum monoclonal protein or at least 500 mg/24 hrs of urine M-protein; 2) a myeloma protein increase above the response criteria for Partial Remission, with the same requirements for the absolute magnitude of the protein increase; 3)reappearance of any myeloma peak that had disappeared while on protocol treatment, provided it meets the same requirements listed above; 4) increase in the size and number of lytic bone lesions recognized on radiographs.
From date of initial registration to date of progression/relapse of disease or death from any cause, whichever came first, up to 5 years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Toxicity
From time of initiating study treatment until discontinuation of study treatment or of open-label REVLIMID + LOW DOSE DEX, whichever comes last, up to 5 years
Study Arms (2)
Arm I
EXPERIMENTALPatients receive induction therapy comprising oral dexamethasone (DM) on days 1-4, 9-12, and 17-20 and oral lenalidomide on days 1-28. Treatment repeats every 35 days for up to 3 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients then receive maintenance therapy comprising oral DM on days 1-4 and 15-18 and oral lenalidomide on days 1-21. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Arm II
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients receive induction therapy comprising DM as in arm I induction and oral placebo on days 1-28. Treatment repeats as in arm I induction. Some patients may then receive maintenance therapy comprising oral DM as in arm I maintenance and oral placebo on days 1-21. Courses repeat as in arm I maintenance.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- SWOG Cancer Research Networklead
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
Study Sites (2)
William Beaumont Hospital - Royal Oak Campus
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073, United States
Utah Cancer Specialists at UCS Cancer Center
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84106, United States
Related Publications (3)
Zonder JA, Crowley JJ, Bolejack V, et al.: A randomized Southwest Oncology Group study comparing dexamethasone (D) to lenalidomide + dexamethasone (LD) as treatment of newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM): impact of cytogenetic abnormalities on efficacy of LD, and updated overall study results. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 26 (Suppl 15): A-8521, 2008.
RESULTZonder JA, Crowley J, Hussein MA, et al.: Superiority of lenalidomide (Len) plus high-dose dexamethasone (HD) compared to HD alone as treatment of newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM): results of the randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled SWOG trial S0232. [Abstract] Blood 110 (11): A-77, 2007.
RESULTZonder JA, Crowley J, Hussein MA, Bolejack V, Moore DF Sr, Whittenberger BF, Abidi MH, Durie BG, Barlogie B. Lenalidomide and high-dose dexamethasone compared with dexamethasone as initial therapy for multiple myeloma: a randomized Southwest Oncology Group trial (S0232). Blood. 2010 Dec 23;116(26):5838-41. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-08-303487. Epub 2010 Sep 27.
PMID: 20876454DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Robert Z. Orlowski, MD, PhD
- Organization
- SWOG
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Jeffrey A. Zonder, MD
Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 8, 2003
First Posted
July 9, 2003
Study Start
November 1, 2004
Primary Completion
October 1, 2008
Study Completion
May 1, 2012
Last Updated
March 25, 2015
Results First Posted
July 17, 2013
Record last verified: 2015-03