Study Stopped
Principal investigator left the institution.
Radiofrequency Ablation in Treating Patients With Unresectable Primary or Metastatic Liver Cancer
The Use of Radiofrequency Ablation to Treat Hepatic Neoplasms
3 other identifiers
interventional
44
1 country
1
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Radiofrequency ablation is a procedure that heats tumors to several degrees above body temperature and may kill tumor cells. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation in treating patients who have unresectable primary or metastatic liver cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Aug 1998
Longer than P75 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 1998
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 11, 2001
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 27, 2003
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 12, 2014
CompletedFebruary 3, 2017
December 1, 2016
10.4 years
July 11, 2001
April 1, 2014
December 7, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Response
Standard response criteria will be used to assess the CT (computed tomography) scan images on a lesion per lesion basis. Complete response is complete disappearance of the index lesion on followup scan when compared to the pretreatment images. Partial response is a decrease of 50% or greater in the product of the perpendicular diameters of the measured lesion following treatment compared to the pretreatment images. Minor response is a decrease between 25% and 49% in the product of the perpendicular diameters of the measured lesion following treatment compared to the pretreatment images. Stable disease is no change in the size of the treated lesion. Progressive disease is an increase of greater than 25% in the product of the perpendicular diameters of the measured lesion following treatment compared to the pretreatment images.
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
9 years, 9 months
Tumor Blood Flow
Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months following treatment
Tumor Vascular Density
Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months following treatment
Percentage of Participants With a Response Using Fludeoxyglucose (18F) - Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET) Following Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA)
Baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months following treatment
Compare Fludeoxyglucose (18F) Positron-Emission Tomography (FDG-PET) Results With Computed Tomography (CT)
Baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months following treatment
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Radiofrequency ablation in liver cancer
EXPERIMENTALThis trial is designed to gain experience with the use of ablation devices with liver tumors. Radiofrequency ablation is a procedure that heats tumors to several degrees above body temperature and may kill tumor cells.
Interventions
Scan to assess the effects of ablation.
Imaging used to assess the effects of this ablative therapy on tumor vascular density.
Physiology based method of imaging disease based on uptake and metabolism of radiopharmaceutical by the tissues.
Radiofrequency ablation uses saline infusion into and out of needle/electrode through a closed system. More energy may be deposited without tissue-charring or gas vaporization.
Imaging following injection of a radioactive material.
An ultrasound (e.g. sound waves) is used to identify the lesion and needle placement.
FDG PET scans rely on metabolic changes to evaluate response to therapy.
Food and Drug Administration approved contrast agent.
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Warren Grant Magnuson Clinical Center - NCI Clinical Trials Referral Office
Bethesda, Maryland, 20892-1182, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Adverse event data is available but the format is uninterpretable.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Caryn Steakley
- Organization
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Steven A Libutti, MD
National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- NIH
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 11, 2001
First Posted
January 27, 2003
Study Start
August 1, 1998
Primary Completion
January 1, 2009
Study Completion
January 1, 2009
Last Updated
February 3, 2017
Results First Posted
June 12, 2014
Record last verified: 2016-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share