Success Metrics

Clinical Success Rate
100.0%

Based on 9 completed trials

Completion Rate
100%(9/9)
Active Trials
2(11%)
Results Posted
0%(0 trials)

Phase Distribution

Ph phase_2
1
6%
Ph phase_4
4
22%
Ph not_applicable
11
61%

Phase Distribution

0

Early Stage

1

Mid Stage

4

Late Stage

Phase Distribution16 total trials
Phase 2Efficacy & side effects
1(6.3%)
Phase 4Post-market surveillance
4(25.0%)
N/ANon-phased studies
11(68.8%)

Highest Phase Reached

Phase 4

Trial Status & Enrollment

Completion Rate

100.0%

9 of 9 finished

Non-Completion Rate

0.0%

0 ended early

Currently Active

2

trials recruiting

Total Trials

18

all time

Status Distribution
Active(3)
Completed(9)
Other(6)

Detailed Status

Completed9
unknown6
Active, not recruiting1
Recruiting1
Not yet recruiting1

Development Timeline

Analytics

Development Status

Total Trials
18
Active
2
Success Rate
100.0%
Most Advanced
Phase 4

Trials by Phase

Phase 21 (6.3%)
Phase 44 (25.0%)
N/A11 (68.8%)

Trials by Status

active_not_recruiting16%
completed950%
unknown633%
recruiting16%
not_yet_recruiting16%

Recent Activity

Clinical Trials (18)

Showing 18 of 18 trials
NCT07566416

The Effect of Preoperative Mirabegron Use on Ureteral Access Sheath Insertion

Completed
NCT07510178Not Applicable

Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Versus Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy

Not Yet Recruiting
NCT07342361Not Applicable

Using Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Managing Staghorn Renal Stones.

Recruiting
NCT07349992Not Applicable

Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) With High-Power Laser and Flexible, Navigable Suction Access Sheath (FANS) vs Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (miniPCNL) for 2-3 cm Renal Stones

Completed
NCT06684756Not Applicable

Comparison of Vacuum-Assisted and Conventional Ureteral Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery

Active Not Recruiting
NCT06249100Phase 2

Flexible Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Vs Retrograde Intra-renal Surgery

Completed
NCT06175910Not Applicable

Postoperative Outcomes of PCNL vs RIRS in Obese Patients With Pelvic 1.5:3 cm Renal Stones

Completed
NCT06138704

Evaluation of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Results and Stone-free Rate in Children With Kidney Stones

Completed
NCT03719456Not Applicable

Prospective Assessment of Procedure-Related and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) for Renal Calculi Less Than 20 mm

Completed
NCT02519634Not Applicable

SMP vs RIRS for Symptomatic Lower Pole Renal Calculi of 10-20 mm Size: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Completed
NCT03614247Not Applicable

Cost-Effectiveness of Different Treatment Options for Lower Calyceal Stones

Completed
NCT03503539Not Applicable

Are the Stone Density and Location Useful Parameters for Small Kidney Stones?

Completed
NCT02645708Not Applicable

External Physical Vibration Lithecbole(EPVL) Versus Traditional Row of Stone After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery(RIRS)

Unknown
NCT02451319Phase 4

Comparison of Safety and Efficiency of 20w 30w Holmium Laser Device in Treatment of 1-2 cm Diameter Kidney Stones With RIRS

Unknown
NCT02443909Phase 4

Comparison of Safety and Efficiency of 20w and 30w Holmium Laser Device in Management of 2-3 cm Diameter Kidney Stones With Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery

Unknown
NCT02430883Phase 4

Is There Any Relation Between Pain and Stone Location in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery?

Unknown
NCT02430168Phase 4

Comparison of RIRS Versus PCNL Methods, According to Postoperative Pain and Analgesic Demand in 2 to 4 cm Renal Stones

Unknown
NCT01514032Not Applicable

Extracorporal Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for the Treatment of Kidney Stones

Unknown

All 18 trials loaded

Drug Details

Intervention Type
PROCEDURE
Total Trials
18