Comparison of Vacuum-Assisted and Conventional Ureteral Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery
The Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Vacuum-Assisted and Conventional Ureteral Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Prospective Multicenter Study
1 other identifier
interventional
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety, the ratio of stone-free rates, and complications of two types of access sheaths used in retrograde intrarenal surgery to treat upper urothelial stones. The access sheath types are those with vacuum aspiration and the conventional ones.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 8, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 12, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2025
CompletedNovember 20, 2025
November 1, 2024
1 year
November 8, 2024
November 19, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Stone free rates
Presence/absence of residual fragments in postoperative imaging, if any, diameter of longest axis in mm.
Stone-free status will be checked by performing a non-contrast abdominal CT scan 1 month after the operation.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Complication rates
Peroperative complication rates will be determined during the operation, and postoperative complications will be re-evaluated during hospitalization before discharge or in the first month after discharge.
Study Arms (2)
Patients with conventional UAS being used in their RIRS operations
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe patient population will be selected from cases determined by randomization and used with UAS without an aspiration (conventional) during RIRS.
Patients with vacuum assisted UAS being used in their RIRS operations
EXPERIMENTALThe patient population will be selected from cases determined by randomization and used with UAS with an aspiration and flexible tip, different from the conventional one during RIRS.
Interventions
Flexible optic devices and lasers fragment kidney stones during this operation. In this surgery, an ureteral access sheath is recommended to be used.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients over 18 years of age
- Patients below 85 years of age
- Patients with 11-13 FR conventional/vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheath (UAS) during retrograde intrarenal surgery
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with non-sterile preoperative urine culture
- Patients with renal anatomic anomalies
- Patients with a solitary (single) kidney
- Patients with insufficient data
- Patients under the age of 18, above the age of 85
- Patients without an UAS during RIRS
- Patients without 11-13Fr UAS during RIRS
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Tekirdag Namık Kemal University
Tekirdağ, Turkey, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (4)
Wang D, Xu Y, Liu Z, Liang J, Lai D, Guan W, Xu G. Using vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheath in the treatment of complex steinstrasse. Urolithiasis. 2023 Jun 22;51(1):89. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01462-2.
PMID: 37347309BACKGROUNDZhang Z, Xie T, Li F, Wang X, Liu F, Jiang B, Zou X, Zhang G, Yuan Y, Xiao R, Wu G, Qian B. Comparison of traditional and novel tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath combined with flexible ureteroscope to treat unilateral renal calculi. World J Urol. 2023 Dec;41(12):3619-3627. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04648-w. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
PMID: 37821778BACKGROUNDNao T, Iga R, Yoshimura R, Kurano Y, Yamamoto S, Tamura K. A new method for effective use of the ClearPetra ureteral access sheath for a giant ureteral stone. Urol Case Rep. 2023 Oct 23;51:102599. doi: 10.1016/j.eucr.2023.102599. eCollection 2023 Nov.
PMID: 38024505BACKGROUNDGauhar V, Traxer O, Castellani D, Sietz C, Chew BH, Fong KY, Hamri SB, Gokce MI, Gadzhiev N, Galosi AB, Yuen SKK, El Hajj A, Ko R, Zawadzki M, Sridharan V, Lakmichi MA, Corrales M, Malkhasyan V, Ragoori D, Soebhali B, Tan K, Chai CA, Tursunkulov AN, Tanidir Y, Persaud S, Elshazly M, Kamal W, Tefik T, Shrestha A, Tiong HC, Somani BK. Could Use of a Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Be a Potential Game-changer in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery? Outcomes at 30 Days from a Large, Prospective, Multicenter, Real-world Study by the European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Section. Eur Urol Focus. 2024 Dec;10(6):975-982. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2024.05.010. Epub 2024 May 24.
PMID: 38789313RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Cenk M. Yazici, Professor
Namik Kemal University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 8, 2024
First Posted
November 12, 2024
Study Start
October 1, 2024
Primary Completion
October 1, 2025
Study Completion
December 1, 2025
Last Updated
November 20, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share