Facial Asymmetry
14
1
2
3
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
100% trial completion (above average)
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
Moderate Risk
Score: 50/100
0.0%
0 terminated out of 14 trials
100.0%
+13.5% vs benchmark
7%
1 trials in Phase 3/4
33%
1 of 3 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.5%
Based on 3 completed trials
Clinical Trials (14)
Exploring Optimal Photographic Parameters for Standardized Facial Aesthetics Analysis
Assessment of the Accuracy of Patient Specific Plates for Correction of Maxillary Cant in Facial Asymmetry
The Facial Muscular Activity: A Paradigm for Understanding Facial Asymmetry
Accuracy of Photogrammetric Three-Dimensional Facial Models Reconstruction Compared With Direct Anthropometry
Application of Virtual Mandibular Position in Temporomandibular Jont Reconstruction With Costochondral Graft in Children Jaw Deformity
Comparison of an Office-based Limited Facelift and Hospital-based Full Facelift
Measuring the Influence of Maxillary Obturator Prosthesis on Facial Morphology in Patient With Unilateral Maxillary Defects Using Stereophotogrammetry
Prevalence of Facial Asymmetry Among Orthodontic Patients
Efficacy of Intravenous Iron Therapy in Maintaining Hemoglobin Concentration on Patients Undergoing Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery
Comparison Between Internal and External Distractors in Osteogenesis
Accuracy of a CAD/CAM Surgical Template for Mandible Distraction
Comparison of Three Botulinum Neuromodulators for Management of Facial Synkinesis
Computational Modeling for Prediction of Acoustic Changes in Vowel Production Due to Orthognathic Surgery
Computer Assisted Orthognathic Surgery. Facial Asymmetry