Accuracy of Photogrammetric Three-Dimensional Facial Models Reconstruction Compared With Direct Anthropometry
1 other identifier
observational
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Accuracy of Two Different Photogrammetric Software for Three Dimensional Facial Model Reconstructions Compared with Direct Facial Anthropometry.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Sep 2024
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 17, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 27, 2025
CompletedMarch 27, 2025
March 1, 2025
2 months
July 17, 2023
March 20, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Accuracy of Photogrammetry in Generating 3D Facial Models - Linear Measurements
* A 3D model was generated for each volunteer using photogrammetry software. Anthropometric linear measurements was taken using a digital caliper, and photogrammetric linear measurements was extracted from the 3D model. * Two LEGO® blocks with uniform dimensions were attached to the participants' faces to scale the 3D model to actual metric dimensions. Unit of Measure: millimeters(mm)
Baseline (procedure)
Accuracy of Photogrammetry in Generating 3D Facial Models - Angular Measurements
* This outcome measure focuses on the accuracy of photogrammetry in capturing and reproducing angular measurements of facial features. * Volunteers' 3D facial models were generated using photogrammetry software from multiple photos. * Two LEGO® blocks with uniform dimensions were attached to the forehead and cheek for scaling and reference. Angular measurements, based on these blocks, were extracted from the 3D model. The measurements were compared to validate the method's precision in reproducing angular dimensions. Unit of Measure: Degrees (°)
Baseline (procedure)
Study Arms (3)
Direct facial anthropometry group
first photogrammetric software group
second photogrammetric software group
Eligibility Criteria
This study will be carried out on fifty volunteers, selected from outpatient clinic at Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Assiut branch; aged 18 years or older.
You may qualify if:
- Participants aged 18 or older
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of:
- Extensive facial hair (beards).
- Significant facial defects.
- Surgical scars.
- Neuromuscular disorders that may hinder stability of head during image acquisition.
- Accessories that could interfere with image acquisition.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Dental Medicine, Al-Azhar University
Asyut, Egypt
Related Publications (12)
Bradley E, Shelton A, Hodge T, Morris D, Bekker H, Fletcher S, Barber S. Patient-reported experience and outcomes from orthodontic treatment. J Orthod. 2020 Jun;47(2):107-115. doi: 10.1177/1465312520904377. Epub 2020 Feb 29.
PMID: 32116083BACKGROUNDSarver DM. Interactions of hard tissues, soft tissues, and growth over time, and their impact on orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Sep;148(3):380-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.04.030.
PMID: 26321335BACKGROUNDMohan A, Sivakumar A, Nalabothu P. Evaluation of accuracy and reliability of OneCeph digital cephalometric analysis in comparison with manual cephalometric analysis-a cross-sectional study. BDJ Open. 2021 Jun 17;7(1):22. doi: 10.1038/s41405-021-00077-2.
PMID: 34140466BACKGROUNDKamburoglu K. Use of dentomaxillofacial cone beam computed tomography in dentistry. World J Radiol. 2015 Jun 28;7(6):128-30. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v7.i6.128.
PMID: 26120381BACKGROUNDJain S, Choudhary K, Nagi R, Shukla S, Kaur N, Grover D. New evolution of cone-beam computed tomography in dentistry: Combining digital technologies. Imaging Sci Dent. 2019 Sep;49(3):179-190. doi: 10.5624/isd.2019.49.3.179. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
PMID: 31583200BACKGROUNDMao WY, Lei J, Lim LZ, Gao Y, Tyndall DA, Fu K. Comparison of radiographical characteristics and diagnostic accuracy of intraosseous jaw lesions on panoramic radiographs and CBCT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2021 Feb 1;50(2):20200165. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20200165. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
PMID: 32941743BACKGROUNDStruck R, Cordoni S, Aliotta S, Perez-Pachon L, Groning F. Application of Photogrammetry in Biomedical Science. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1120:121-130. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-06070-1_10.
PMID: 30919299BACKGROUNDHeike CL, Upson K, Stuhaug E, Weinberg SM. 3D digital stereophotogrammetry: a practical guide to facial image acquisition. Head Face Med. 2010 Jul 28;6:18. doi: 10.1186/1746-160X-6-18.
PMID: 20667081BACKGROUNDErten O, Yilmaz BN. Three-Dimensional Imaging in Orthodontics. Turk J Orthod. 2018 Sep;31(3):86-94. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2018.17041. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
PMID: 30206567BACKGROUNDD'Ettorre G, Farronato M, Candida E, Quinzi V, Grippaudo C. A comparison between stereophotogrammetry and smartphone structured light technology for three-dimensional face scanning. Angle Orthod. 2022 May 1;92(3):358-363. doi: 10.2319/040921-290.1.
PMID: 35015071BACKGROUND12- Arapovic-Savic M, Savic M, Umicevic-Davidovic M, Arbutina A, Nedeljkovic N, Glisic B. A novel method of photogrammetry measurements of study models in orthodontics. Srpski arhiv za celokupno lekarstvo. 2019;147(1):10-6.
BACKGROUNDGupta A. On imaging modalities for cephalometric analysis: a review. Multimedia Tools and Applications. 2023 Mar 21:1-22.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- OTHER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 17, 2023
First Posted
March 27, 2025
Study Start
September 1, 2024
Primary Completion
November 1, 2024
Study Completion
January 1, 2025
Last Updated
March 27, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03