NCT06897852

Brief Summary

Accuracy of Two Different Photogrammetric Software for Three Dimensional Facial Model Reconstructions Compared with Direct Facial Anthropometry.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2024

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 17, 2023

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 27, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

March 27, 2025

Status Verified

March 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

July 17, 2023

Last Update Submit

March 20, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

facial scanningphotogrammetryfacial anthropometry

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Accuracy of Photogrammetry in Generating 3D Facial Models - Linear Measurements

    * A 3D model was generated for each volunteer using photogrammetry software. Anthropometric linear measurements was taken using a digital caliper, and photogrammetric linear measurements was extracted from the 3D model. * Two LEGO® blocks with uniform dimensions were attached to the participants' faces to scale the 3D model to actual metric dimensions. Unit of Measure: millimeters(mm)

    Baseline (procedure)

  • Accuracy of Photogrammetry in Generating 3D Facial Models - Angular Measurements

    * This outcome measure focuses on the accuracy of photogrammetry in capturing and reproducing angular measurements of facial features. * Volunteers' 3D facial models were generated using photogrammetry software from multiple photos. * Two LEGO® blocks with uniform dimensions were attached to the forehead and cheek for scaling and reference. Angular measurements, based on these blocks, were extracted from the 3D model. The measurements were compared to validate the method's precision in reproducing angular dimensions. Unit of Measure: Degrees (°)

    Baseline (procedure)

Study Arms (3)

Direct facial anthropometry group

first photogrammetric software group

second photogrammetric software group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

This study will be carried out on fifty volunteers, selected from outpatient clinic at Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Assiut branch; aged 18 years or older.

You may qualify if:

  • Participants aged 18 or older

You may not qualify if:

  • Presence of:
  • Extensive facial hair (beards).
  • Significant facial defects.
  • Surgical scars.
  • Neuromuscular disorders that may hinder stability of head during image acquisition.
  • Accessories that could interfere with image acquisition.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Faculty of Dental Medicine, Al-Azhar University

Asyut, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (12)

  • Bradley E, Shelton A, Hodge T, Morris D, Bekker H, Fletcher S, Barber S. Patient-reported experience and outcomes from orthodontic treatment. J Orthod. 2020 Jun;47(2):107-115. doi: 10.1177/1465312520904377. Epub 2020 Feb 29.

    PMID: 32116083BACKGROUND
  • Sarver DM. Interactions of hard tissues, soft tissues, and growth over time, and their impact on orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Sep;148(3):380-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.04.030.

    PMID: 26321335BACKGROUND
  • Mohan A, Sivakumar A, Nalabothu P. Evaluation of accuracy and reliability of OneCeph digital cephalometric analysis in comparison with manual cephalometric analysis-a cross-sectional study. BDJ Open. 2021 Jun 17;7(1):22. doi: 10.1038/s41405-021-00077-2.

    PMID: 34140466BACKGROUND
  • Kamburoglu K. Use of dentomaxillofacial cone beam computed tomography in dentistry. World J Radiol. 2015 Jun 28;7(6):128-30. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v7.i6.128.

    PMID: 26120381BACKGROUND
  • Jain S, Choudhary K, Nagi R, Shukla S, Kaur N, Grover D. New evolution of cone-beam computed tomography in dentistry: Combining digital technologies. Imaging Sci Dent. 2019 Sep;49(3):179-190. doi: 10.5624/isd.2019.49.3.179. Epub 2019 Sep 24.

    PMID: 31583200BACKGROUND
  • Mao WY, Lei J, Lim LZ, Gao Y, Tyndall DA, Fu K. Comparison of radiographical characteristics and diagnostic accuracy of intraosseous jaw lesions on panoramic radiographs and CBCT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2021 Feb 1;50(2):20200165. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20200165. Epub 2020 Sep 17.

    PMID: 32941743BACKGROUND
  • Struck R, Cordoni S, Aliotta S, Perez-Pachon L, Groning F. Application of Photogrammetry in Biomedical Science. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1120:121-130. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-06070-1_10.

    PMID: 30919299BACKGROUND
  • Heike CL, Upson K, Stuhaug E, Weinberg SM. 3D digital stereophotogrammetry: a practical guide to facial image acquisition. Head Face Med. 2010 Jul 28;6:18. doi: 10.1186/1746-160X-6-18.

    PMID: 20667081BACKGROUND
  • Erten O, Yilmaz BN. Three-Dimensional Imaging in Orthodontics. Turk J Orthod. 2018 Sep;31(3):86-94. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2018.17041. Epub 2018 Apr 11.

    PMID: 30206567BACKGROUND
  • D'Ettorre G, Farronato M, Candida E, Quinzi V, Grippaudo C. A comparison between stereophotogrammetry and smartphone structured light technology for three-dimensional face scanning. Angle Orthod. 2022 May 1;92(3):358-363. doi: 10.2319/040921-290.1.

    PMID: 35015071BACKGROUND
  • 12- Arapovic-Savic M, Savic M, Umicevic-Davidovic M, Arbutina A, Nedeljkovic N, Glisic B. A novel method of photogrammetry measurements of study models in orthodontics. Srpski arhiv za celokupno lekarstvo. 2019;147(1):10-6.

    BACKGROUND
  • Gupta A. On imaging modalities for cephalometric analysis: a review. Multimedia Tools and Applications. 2023 Mar 21:1-22.

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

MalocclusionDiseaseFacial Asymmetry

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tooth DiseasesStomatognathic DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Anatomical

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
OTHER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 17, 2023

First Posted

March 27, 2025

Study Start

September 1, 2024

Primary Completion

November 1, 2024

Study Completion

January 1, 2025

Last Updated

March 27, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-03

Locations