Canine Retraction
16
1
1
8
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
89% trial completion (above average)
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
Moderate Risk
Score: 50/100
6.3%
1 terminated out of 16 trials
88.9%
+2.3% vs benchmark
0%
0 trials in Phase 3/4
25%
2 of 8 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.5%
Based on 8 completed trials
Clinical Trials (16)
Maxillary Canine Retraction Using Stainless Steel and Titanium-molybdenum Alloy Wires in TAD-supported Segmental Mechanics
Comparison of Rate of Tooth Movement Between MOPs vs MOPs & LLLT Combined
Comparison of Maxillary Canine Retraction Rate Among Conventional (Labial) vs Dual (Simultaneous Labial and Palatal) Force Mechanics Using Labial Fixed Orthodontic Appliances
Assessment of the Locally Administrated Vitamin D3 and Corticision Efficacy on Orthodontic Canine Retraction
Characterizing Orthodontic Tooth Movement With Photographic Scans
Comparing Ligation Methods During Canine Retraction Stage Using Conventional Brackets
Gingival Crevicular Fluid Characterization During Orthodontic Treatment
Assessment of Dimensional Bony Changes Following Laser Corticotomy
Single Versus Repeated Piezocision-assisted Orthodontic Tooth Movement
The Effect of Rectangular Versus Square Archwire on Maxillary Canine Retraction
Three-dimensional Assessment of the Bone Changes Accompanying Laser-assisted Orthodontic Tooth Movement
Evaluation of Periodontal Distractor in Acceleration of Canine Retraction
Poul Gjessing Versus T Loops for Orthodontic Maxillary Canine Retraction
Effect of Gradually Increasing Force Magnitude on the Rate of Canine Retraction Randomized Controlled Trial
Effect of Archwire Gauge on the Rate of Canine Retraction
Evaluation of the Effects of Osteoperforation and Piezocorticision on Canine Retraction