Choose Myself (Before) Losing Myself
CYOA
2 other identifiers
interventional
25
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to see if an educational interactive booklet about how dementia progresses throughout a person's life can be a helpful tool for patients to think about future decisions that might need to be made regarding their medical care and helping patients discuss their diagnosis and possible future medical decisions with their family or future caregivers.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 16, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 29, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 30, 2026
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 30, 2027
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2027
September 29, 2026
September 1, 2026
7 months
September 16, 2026
September 22, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
The Dementia Knowledge Assessment Tool (DKAT2)
Dementia knowledge will be assessed using the 21-item Dementia Knowledge Assessment Tool Version 2 (DKAT2), which was developed to assess foundation-level knowledge of dementia. Each item has three response options: Yes, No, and Don't Know. Each correct response is assigned 1 point, while an incorrect or Don't Know response is assigned 0 points. Total scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater dementia knowledge. The baseline and follow up assessment may be completed either independently using a paper questionnaire or as an interviewer-administered questionnaire by study personnel. The change in total DKAT2 score from baseline to post-intervention will be assessed.
Participants will complete the DKAT2 at baseline, and 1-30 days after reviewing the toolkit at follow-up telephone encounter. The follow-up assessment window may extend 30 additional days if participants wish to remain in the study.
Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT)
Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT), will be used to assess understandability and actionability of print educational material. The PEMAT provides two domain scores: understandability and actionability. Understandability is assessed using 17 items, and actionability is assessed using 7 items. Each applicable item is scored as 1 (agree) or 0 (disagree). Domain scores are calculated as the percentage of applicable items receiving a score of 1. Scores range from 0% to 100% for each domain, with higher scores indicating greater understandability and actionability. Understandability and actionability scores will be reported separately. The PEMAT may be completed as an interviewer-administered questionnaire by study personnel.
PEMAT will be completed 1-30 days after reviewing the toolkit at follow-up telephone encounter along with DKAT2. The follow-up assessment window may extend 30 additional days if participants wish to remain in the study.
Other Outcomes (1)
Participant-Reported Educational Material Evaluation and Engagement
These four questions will be completed 1-30 days after reviewing the toolkit at follow-up telephone encounter along with DKAT2 and PEMAT. The follow-up assessment window may extend 30 additional days if participants wish to remain in the study.
Study Arms (1)
The Choose Your Own Adventure Patient Journey with Dementia booklet (CYOA booklet)
OTHERInterventions
The purpose of the educational booklet in a CYOA format booklet is to provide educational information about the progression of dementia and to help patients to think about potential future medical decisions that may need to be made for them. By being more informed, patients can discuss their wishes with their family members or future caregivers, include preferences in advanced directives, and/or have a discussion with their medical provider about their future care preferences.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants are at least 18 years of age
- Patients including those: newly diagnosed (within 30 days of informed consent discussion) and established patients diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment or clinical suspicion of mild Alzheimer's dementia diagnosis based on Montreal Cognitive Assessment score (MoCA): 14+, Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) score: 21+ or Functional Assessment Staging Toll (FAST) score: 1-4
- Able to read and respond to questions in English (workbook is not available in any other language and survey instruments are validated in English language).
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals who lack decisional capacity
- Individuals who possess comorbid conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, would place unnecessary additional burden upon a patient for study participation or patients for whom participation the study would not be in their best interests.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
Related Publications (11)
Shoemaker SJ, Wolf MS, Brach C. Development of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT): a new measure of understandability and actionability for print and audiovisual patient information. Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Sep;96(3):395-403. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.027. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
PMID: 24973195BACKGROUNDToye C, Lester L, Popescu A, McInerney F, Andrews S, Robinson AL. Dementia Knowledge Assessment Tool Version Two: development of a tool to inform preparation for care planning and delivery in families and care staff. Dementia (London). 2014 Mar 1;13(2):248-56. doi: 10.1177/1471301212471960. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
PMID: 24339059BACKGROUNDKerfoot BP, Kissane N. The use of gamification to boost residents' engagement in simulation training. JAMA Surg. 2014 Nov;149(11):1208-9. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1779. No abstract available.
PMID: 25229631BACKGROUNDChen PH, Roth H, Galperin-Aizenberg M, Ruutiainen AT, Gefter W, Cook TS. Improving Abnormality Detection on Chest Radiography Using Game-Like Reinforcement Mechanics. Acad Radiol. 2017 Nov;24(11):1428-1435. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
PMID: 28647389BACKGROUNDNevin CR, Westfall AO, Rodriguez JM, Dempsey DM, Cherrington A, Roy B, Patel M, Willig JH. Gamification as a tool for enhancing graduate medical education. Postgrad Med J. 2014 Dec;90(1070):685-93. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2013-132486. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
PMID: 25352673BACKGROUNDCragun DL, Hunt PP, Dean M, Zierhut H, Kaphingst K, Resnicow K. Creation and beta testing of a "choose your own adventure" digital simulation to reinforce motivational interviewing skills in genetic counseling. J Genet Couns. 2024 Feb;33(1):15-27. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1833. Epub 2023 Nov 11.
PMID: 37950577BACKGROUNDRutledge C, Walsh CM, Swinger N, Auerbach M, Castro D, Dewan M, Khattab M, Rake A, Harwayne-Gidansky I, Raymond TT, Maa T, Chang TP; Quality Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (QCPR) leaderboard investigators of the International Network for Simulation-based Pediatric Innovation, Research, and Education (INSPIRE). Gamification in Action: Theoretical and Practical Considerations for Medical Educators. Acad Med. 2018 Jul;93(7):1014-1020. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002183.
PMID: 29465450BACKGROUNDDeterding S, Dixon D, Khaled R, Nacke L. From game design elements to gamefulness: defining "gamification." In: Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments. MindTrek '11. Association for Computing Machinery; 2011:9-15
BACKGROUNDDementia: a public health priority
BACKGROUNDThe Lancet Public Health: Global dementia cases set to triple by 2050 unless countries address risk factors | Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation
BACKGROUNDPublic Health Action in Ohio | Alzheimer's Association. Alzheimer's Association
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kimberlee Fong, DO
The Cleveland Clinic
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 16, 2026
First Posted
September 29, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
October 30, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 30, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 31, 2027
Last Updated
September 29, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
De-identified data may be shared on a case-by-case basis after compliance and regulatory approval have been obtained. Access will be provided on a case-by-case basis pending approval by the Cleveland Clinic IRB and law department.