Enhancing Spatial Navigation Using Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation
1 other identifier
interventional
44
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Remembering how to travel from one location to another is critical in everyday life, yet this vital ability declines with normal aging and can be further affected by conditions that disproportionately affect the elderly, such as vision loss or progressive dementia. Human and animal research has shown that two distinct memory systems interact during navigation. The first, referred to as allocentric navigation, is very flexible and uses spatial knowledge of key features or landmarks to develop and use a mental map of the environment. This approach involves brain regions that are critical for new learning and memory but that decline with age. The second, referred to as egocentric navigation, is inflexible and relies on "habit" memories that link specific features with specific directions. This approach relies on brain regions that are critical for "automatic" responses and that are relatively unaffected by age. The main problem is that allocentric navigation declines with age and is accompanied increased dependence on egocentric navigation. This change increases the risk of becoming disoriented or "lost" when traveling in unfamiliar areas or even when traveling new routes in familiar areas. Therefore, the main goal of this project is to examine whether non-invasive brain stimulation, specifically transcranial direct current stimulation, can improve allocentric navigation in healthy older adults and patients with mild cognitive impairment. Participants will complete two functional magnetic resonance imaging sessions while learning new environments. Before one of these sessions, participants will receive active brain stimulation over the parietal cortex. Before the other session, participants will receive sham brain stimulation over the parietal cortex. The effects of this stimulation will be evaluated using both an allocentric and an egocentric memory test. Physiologic effects will be evaluated using both task-based and resting-state MRI.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 23, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 9, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 23, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 24, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 31, 2018
CompletedAugust 31, 2018
August 1, 2018
3.5 years
September 23, 2013
April 16, 2018
August 28, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Accuracy in Centimeters From Target Location for Allocentric
1 active tDCS; 1 sham tDCS for each measure. Participants touched a screen (using a ELO 19" touchscreen monitor) to document the location of the landmark. The distance between the actual vs. selected location served as the dependent measure.
Outcome assessed after each of 2 sessions (estimated within 1 week of each other)
Hippocampal BOLD Signal During Task-based fMRI
BOLD signal change comparing active to sham tDCS during Allocentric navigation (i.e., active HD-tDCS \> sham HD-tDCS). Activation maps thresholded at p\<.01 with minimum cluster size of 5 voxels.
change between active and sham tDCS sessions (<1month)
Dorsal Attention Network Connectivity During Resting-state fMRI
Change in resting state functional connectivity strength between active and sham tDCS sessions. Strength is measured by Pearson r correlations between nodes, which are z-transformed, and summated.
change between active and sham tDCS sessions (<1month)
Egocentric
Number of turns correctly recalled for each egocentric environment
Outcome assessed after each of the 2 sessions
Study Arms (4)
Cognitively intact older adults - ACTIVE tDCS
EXPERIMENTALGroup receives active brain stimulation
MCI ACTIVE tDCS
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup receives active brain stimulation
Cognitively intact older adults - SHAM tDCS
SHAM COMPARATORGroup receives sham brain stimulation
MCI SHAM tDCS
SHAM COMPARATORGroup receives sham brain stimulation
Interventions
Active and/or sham; All participants receive both stimulation condition. Groups will be counterbalanced (half receiving active tDCS in the first session and sham in the second session; the other half receiving the opposite).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All medications stable for approximately 1-2 months;
- No history of severe mental illness;
- No current untreated alcohol or substance abuse/dependence;
- English as native and preferred language;
- MRI-compatible if taking part in fMRI studies
- Able to give informed consent.
- Diagnosis of amnestic MCI based on criteria set forth by Petersen (2004). Additionally, other potential causes of cognitive deficit ruled out by the referring physician;
- Healthy older adults
- intact cognitive functioning as measured by neuropsychological testing
You may not qualify if:
- History of neurological disease or injury
- History of severe mental illness
- Current untreated alcohol or substance abuse
- Other conditions may exclude; please discuss with contact
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Atlanta VA Medical and Rehab Center, Decatur, GA
Decatur, Georgia, 30033, United States
VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48105, United States
Related Publications (2)
England HB, Fyock C, Meredith Gillis M, Hampstead BM. Transcranial direct current stimulation modulates spatial memory in cognitively intact adults. Behav Brain Res. 2015 Apr 15;283:191-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.01.044. Epub 2015 Jan 31.
PMID: 25647757RESULTLengu K, Ryan S, Peltier SJ, Tyszkowski T, Kairys A, Giordani B, Hampstead BM. Effects of High Definition-Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Local GABA and Glutamate Levels Among Older Adults with and without Mild Cognitive Impairment: An Exploratory Study. J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;84(3):1091-1102. doi: 10.3233/JAD-201091.
PMID: 34602464DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Benjamin Hampstead
- Organization
- VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System; University of Michigan
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Benjamin M Hampstead, PhD
VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Double blinded
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 23, 2013
First Posted
October 9, 2013
Study Start
October 1, 2013
Primary Completion
March 23, 2017
Study Completion
March 24, 2017
Last Updated
August 31, 2018
Results First Posted
August 31, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share