NCT07825077

Brief Summary

This study examines the effects of an AI dialogue-based scenario simulation integrated with concept mapping and post-dialogue feedback on nursing students' learning. Nursing students will participate in pediatric care scenarios using standardized AI-supported dialogues. Two feedback approaches will be compared: gamified feedback and conventional formative feedback without gamification elements. The study will examine students' flow experience and learning performance and explore how collaborative processes and interaction mechanisms may contribute to these outcomes. The findings are expected to provide evidence on how different feedback approaches influence students' engagement and learning during AI-supported scenario simulation.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
91

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
4mo left

Started Sep 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress12%
Sep 2026Jan 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 15, 2026

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 17, 2026

Completed
4 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 21, 2026

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 5, 2027

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 5, 2027

Last Updated

September 21, 2026

Status Verified

September 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

September 15, 2026

Last Update Submit

September 16, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Flow Experience

    Flow experience will be assessed using the 8-item Flow Experience Questionnaire developed by Pearce et al. (2005). Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Higher scores indicate a greater level of flow experience. Descriptive statistics will be used to examine the distribution and change in flow scores, missing data, and internal consistency.

    Baseline (before the intervention) and immediately after completion of the intervention (approximately Week 18).

  • Academic Learning Performance

    Academic learning performance will be assessed using students' course midterm and final examination scores. Higher scores indicate better academic performance.

    At approximately Week 9 (midterm examination) and Week 18 (final examination) of the academic semester.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Intrinsic Motivation

    Baseline (before the intervention) and immediately after completion of the intervention (approximately Week 18).

Study Arms (2)

Gamified Feedback Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants receive a concept-mapping-integrated AI dialogue-based scenario simulation followed by gamified feedback. The feedback includes gamification elements such as points, levels, progress indicators, and mission-based features.

Behavioral: Gamified Feedback

Conventional Formative Feedback Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants receive the same concept-mapping-integrated AI dialogue-based scenario simulation followed by conventional formative feedback without gamification elements.

Behavioral: Conventional Formative Feedback

Interventions

Gamified feedback is delivered following the AI dialogue-based scenario simulation and includes game-related elements such as points, levels, progress indicators, and mission-based features.

Gamified Feedback Group

Conventional formative feedback is delivered following the same AI dialogue-based scenario simulation without gamification elements.

Conventional Formative Feedback Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Undergraduate nursing students enrolled in the designated nursing course during the study period.
  • Aged 18 years or older.
  • Willing to participate and providing informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • \- Students who decline or do not provide informed consent.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Chang Gung University of Science and Technology

Taoyuan, Taoyuan City, 333324, Taiwan

Location

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 15, 2026

First Posted

September 17, 2026

Study Start

September 21, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 5, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 5, 2027

Last Updated

September 21, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations