NCT07654335

Brief Summary

The study will investigate safety, usability, feasibility and preliminary efficacy of perturbation-based training in participants post-stroke and older adults with mild balance deficits. Both group will receive three weks of training. The primary outcome measure will be derived from laboratory-induced falls.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable stroke

Timeline
24mo left

Started Sep 2026

Typical duration for not_applicable stroke

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 12, 2026

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 17, 2026

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2026

Expected
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2028

Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2028

Last Updated

June 17, 2026

Status Verified

June 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

June 12, 2026

Last Update Submit

June 12, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Accidental FallsWalkingFall preventionPerturbation-based training

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Perturbation strength

    Perturbation strength that can be reliably counteracted - difference score

    Difference between the two assessments - one day before the first and one day after the last training session

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • mini-BESTest

    Difference between the two assessments - one day before the first and one day after the last training session

  • ABC Scale

    Difference between the two assessments - one day before the first and one day after the last training session

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Adverse events

    During all the nine training sessions across the three weeks

Study Arms (2)

Post-stroke patients

EXPERIMENTAL

Each participant will undergo perturbation-based training and assessment according to an ABA (no intervention/intervention/no intervention) design with assessment at the beginning and end of each phase (four time-points).

Device: PBT

Elderly adults

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Each participant will undergo perturbation-based training and assessment according to an ABA (no intervention/intervention/no intervention) design with assessment at the beginning and end of each phase (four time-points).

Device: PBT

Interventions

PBTDEVICE

Each subject will undergo 9 perturbation-based training sessions with safety harnesses, and the device will deliver waist pulls during treadmill walking. Training sessions will be individually customised. Perturbation intensity will be progressively increased by a physiotherapist according to the subject's abilities. Training sessions will last approximately 30 minutes, 2-3 times per week.

Also known as: PACE-R
Elderly adultsPost-stroke patients

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • ability for independent community walking without aids;
  • sufficient cognitive, visual, and communication abilities for study participation.

You may not qualify if:

  • musculoskeletal impairments;
  • cardiovascular health-related problems;
  • other health conditions that could interfere with the training.
  • discharge from their regular rehabilitation;
  • at least 6 months after first unilateral cerebral stroke;
  • to 70 years of age;
  • absence of additional neurologic conditions.
  • age 65 to 75 years;
  • no known health-related problems significantly affecting balance and walking.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Rehabilitation Institute, Republic of Slovenia

Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Olensek A, Zadravec M, Matjacic Z. A novel methodological approach for inducing slips, trips and pelvic pulls during treadmill walking. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2025 Jul;2025:1-7. doi: 10.1109/EMBC58623.2025.11251529.

    PMID: 41336813BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Zlatko Matjačić, PhD

    University Rehabilitation Institute, Republic of Slovenia

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Katja Groleger Sršen, MD, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Two groups, each group will follow the ABA protocol with A meaning no intervention and B meaning intervention. There will therefore be four assessment points.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2026

First Posted

June 17, 2026

Study Start (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2028

Last Updated

June 17, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations