NCT07697794

Brief Summary

This study innovatively proposes an "environment-perturbation balance training (E-PBT)" intervention, which delivers stable, graded environmental perturbations to keep the challenges within the manageable range. This approach can significantly reduce fear, align with the psychological characteristics of subacute stroke patients, and improve training engagement and safety, thereby filling the current research gap that has insufficiently addressed subacute patients and those with moderate-to-low functional levels. By altering the size and angle of the support surface, this training heightens patients' alertness and psychological adaptability, prompting them to actively integrate sensory information and adjust motor strategies. In turn, this can more effectively reshape internal model of balance control and facilitate genuine neuroadaptive learning in the brain. Moreover, this training more closely mimics real-life fall scenarios, with the aim of directly cultivating the proactive postural control and strategic decision-making abilities required in daily living. This study aims to systematically evaluate the efficacy of this E-PBT intervention on functional recovery in patients during the subacute stage of stroke through a prospective randomized controlled trial, and to explore its potential effects on balance ability, activities of daily living, and overall functional outcomes, thereby providing a more effective and clinically translatable new strategy for post-stroke rehabilitation.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
148

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable stroke

Timeline
17mo left

Started Jul 2026

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress3%
Jul 2026Dec 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 2, 2026

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 13, 2026

Completed
7 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 20, 2026

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 31, 2027

Expected
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2027

Last Updated

July 14, 2026

Status Verified

July 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

July 2, 2026

Last Update Submit

July 10, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

StrokeSubacute stageFunctional prognosisEnvironment-perturbation balance trainingRandomized controlled trialModified Rankin Scale

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The incidence of good functional outcomes after treatment (mRS)

    The primary outcome of this study is the improvement in neurological functional outcome at 90 days post-stroke, as measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). The mRS is a 7-level ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater disability. For clinical interpretability and statistical analysis, the mRS will be dichotomized as follows: a favorable outcome is defined as an mRS score of ≤ 3 (indicating the ability to walk independently or with minimal assistance), and an unfavorable outcome is defined as an mRS score of ≥ 4 (indicating inability to walk independently and requiring assistance in daily activities). At 90 days (±7 days) after stroke, the mRS score will be assessed by trained evaluators who are blinded to group allocation, through face-to-face interviews or telephone follow-ups. The primary comparison will be the difference in the proportion of favorable outcomes (i.e., mRS ≤ 3) between the two groups.

    At 90 days post-stroke

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Shift analysis of the modified Rankin Scale (mRS)

    At 90 days post-stroke

  • Modified Barthel Index

    At 90 days post-stroke

  • mini-BESTest

    Baseline and 90 days post-stroke

  • Overall Stability Index

    At 90 days post-stroke

  • Trunk Impairment Scale

    Baseline and 90 days post-stroke

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Environmental-perturbation balance training group

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in the experimental group will receive environmental-perturbation balance training, at a frequency of 5 sessions per week for 8 weeks (±1 week). Each training session will be structured as follows: 30 minutes in total, consisting of a warm-up, environmental-perturbation balance training, and a cool-down period.

Behavioral: Environmental-perturbation balance training

Conventional rehabilitation training group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants in the control group will receive conventional rehabilitation training at a frequency of 5 sessions per week for 8 weeks (±1 week). Each session will be structured as follows: 30 minutes in total, consisting of a warm-up, conventional rehabilitation training, and a cool-down period.

Behavioral: Conventional rehabilitation training

Interventions

The core principle of this training is to deliver standardized, controllable environmental perturbations tailored to the patient's functional level. All perturbations will be administered under safe conditions, following a stepwise "challenge-adapt-rechallenge" progression principle, with the aim of maximizing the patient's active postural control strategies and neuromuscular adaptation, thereby improving balance function and ultimately facilitating the patient's return to home and community life.

Environmental-perturbation balance training group

Participants in the control group will receive conventional rehabilitation training based on the principles of neuro-developmental therapy (NDT) and motor relearning programme (MRP). The training will include static and dynamic sitting and standing balance, weight shifting, single-leg stance, weight-bearing exercises, core stabilization training, straight-line walking on firm, level ground, and step up and down exercises.

Conventional rehabilitation training group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosed with stroke according to the International Symposium on Cerebral Vascular Disease criteria, with definite confirmation by imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
  • First-ever or recurrent cerebral hemorrhage or cerebral infarction. According to the Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association and the Chinese Guidelines for Early Rehabilitation of Stroke, rehabilitation can be initiated once the patient's condition is stable (vital signs are stable and no further progression of symptoms and signs).
  • Total NIHSS score between 5 and 20 (inclusive) prior to randomization, with a lower limb motor score ≥2.
  • Presence of balance dysfunction, with a miniBESTest total score ≤12.
  • Good compliance with rehabilitation therapy and no contraindications to active training.
  • Age between 18 and 85 years.
  • The subject or their legal representative is able and willing to provide written informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • History of prior cerebral hemorrhage or cerebral infarction with residual significant limb dysfunction.
  • Severe cognitive impairment or sensory aphasia that precludes communication and cooperation with treatment.
  • Concomitant severe cardiopulmonary, hepatic, or renal insufficiency, or other serious medical diseases.
  • Presence of neurological or musculoskeletal disorders affecting balance function prior to stroke onset.
  • Uncontrolled severe hypertension or diabetes mellitus.
  • Active bleeding or deep vein thrombosis.
  • Current participation in another clinical trial or rehabilitation program that may affect the results of this study.
  • Any other condition that may interfere with the outcomes of this study.
  • History of limb amputation affecting bilateral coordination or independent walking ability.
  • Pregnancy.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Shenyang First People's Hospital

Shenyang, Liaoning, 110041, China

Location

Related Publications (13)

  • 中华医学会神经病学分会, 中华医学会神经病学分会神经康复学组, 中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组. 中国脑卒中早期康复治疗指南 [J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2017, 50(06): 405-12.

    BACKGROUND
  • Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, Brown M, Demaerschalk BM, Hoh B, Jauch EC, Kidwell CS, Leslie-Mazwi TM, Ovbiagele B, Scott PA, Sheth KN, Southerland AM, Summers DV, Tirschwell DL. Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e344-e418. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000211. Epub 2019 Oct 30.

    PMID: 31662037BACKGROUND
  • Mansfield A, Aqui A, Danells CJ, Knorr S, Centen A, DePaul VG, Schinkel-Ivy A, Brooks D, Inness EL, Mochizuki G. Does perturbation-based balance training prevent falls among individuals with chronic stroke? A randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 17;8(8):e021510. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021510.

    PMID: 30121600BACKGROUND
  • Hu N, Piirainen JM, Kidgell DJ, Walker S, Avela J. Corticospinal Adaptation to Short-Term Horizontal Balance Perturbation Training. Brain Sci. 2023 Aug 15;13(8):1209. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13081209.

    PMID: 37626565BACKGROUND
  • Schinkel-Ivy A, Huntley AH, Aqui A, Mansfield A. Does Perturbation-Based Balance Training Improve Control of Reactive Stepping in Individuals with Chronic Stroke? J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 Apr;28(4):935-943. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.12.011. Epub 2019 Jan 7.

    PMID: 30630753BACKGROUND
  • Liu X, Bhatt T, Wang Y, Wang S, Lee A, Pai YC. The retention of fall-resisting behavior derived from treadmill slip-perturbation training in community-dwelling older adults. Geroscience. 2021 Apr;43(2):913-926. doi: 10.1007/s11357-020-00270-5. Epub 2020 Sep 25.

    PMID: 32978705BACKGROUND
  • Yang F, Cereceres P, Qiao M. Treadmill-based gait-slip training with reduced training volume could still prevent slip-related falls. Gait Posture. 2018 Oct;66:160-165. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.08.029. Epub 2018 Aug 25.

    PMID: 30195219BACKGROUND
  • Ferreira RN, Ribeiro NF, Figueiredo J, Santos CP. Provoking Artificial Slips and Trips towards Perturbation-Based Balance Training: A Narrative Review. Sensors (Basel). 2022 Nov 28;22(23):9254. doi: 10.3390/s22239254.

    PMID: 36501958BACKGROUND
  • Wang Y, Bhatt T, Liu X, Wang S, Lee A, Wang E, Pai YC. Can treadmill-slip perturbation training reduce immediate risk of over-ground-slip induced fall among community-dwelling older adults? J Biomech. 2019 Feb 14;84:58-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.12.017. Epub 2018 Dec 14.

    PMID: 30616984BACKGROUND
  • Alayat MSM, Almatrafi NA, El Fiky AAR, Elsodany AM, Shousha TM, Basuodan R. The Effectiveness of Perturbation-Based Training in the Treatment of Patients With Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Neurosci Insights. 2022 Jul 23;17:26331055221114818. doi: 10.1177/26331055221114818. eCollection 2022.

    PMID: 35910084BACKGROUND
  • Batchelor FA, Mackintosh SF, Said CM, Hill KD. Falls after stroke. Int J Stroke. 2012 Aug;7(6):482-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00796.x. Epub 2012 Apr 12.

    PMID: 22494388BACKGROUND
  • Saini V, Guada L, Yavagal DR. Global Epidemiology of Stroke and Access to Acute Ischemic Stroke Interventions. Neurology. 2021 Nov 16;97(20 Suppl 2):S6-S16. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012781.

    PMID: 34785599BACKGROUND
  • Grimley RS, Rosbergen IC, Gustafsson L, Horton E, Green T, Cadigan G, Kuys S, Andrew NE, Cadilhac DA. Dose and setting of rehabilitation received after stroke in Queensland, Australia: a prospective cohort study. Clin Rehabil. 2020 Jun;34(6):812-823. doi: 10.1177/0269215520916899. Epub 2020 May 11.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Central Study Contacts

Hong Wang, bachelor's degree

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Director of the Neuro-intelligent Rehabilitation Center

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 2, 2026

First Posted

July 13, 2026

Study Start

July 20, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Last Updated

July 14, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-07

Locations