NCT05843656

Brief Summary

Stroke, one of the most common causes for acquired adult disability, is not only a burden for the individual but also for his or her close relatives and caregivers. Functional recovery is commonly associated with the re-acquisition of lost skills. This skill (re-)acquisition is separated into different phases during which learning takes place while the skill/movement is actively performed - so called online learning - or during the time of non-performance between the training - so called offline learning or consolidation. During the initial phase of training, performance improvements are commonly steep (online learning). During the following processes of consolidation, which often depend on sleep, memory traces are being modified and stored for long-term memory retention leading to a further improvement without additional training (offline learning). Previous studies focusing on individuals after stroke could show a beneficial effect of sleep on motor skill acquisition. As an intervention, transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) with motor tasks could show beneficial effects on motor skill acquisition. tES is a method to stimulate an area of the brain non-invasively and this is done by applying low voltage current to the scalp that lies in close proximity to the target brain region. In the current study, stimulation is performed during sleep and types of stimulation resemble natural sleep physiology: slow-wave and spindles. As slow-wave and spindles are shown to be important for memory consolidation, it is hypothesized that applying physiologically-inspired stimulation could enhance memory consolidation in individuals after stroke. It is known that patterns of sleep physiology change in older individuals, thus, this population is also investigated in the current study. It is interpreted and discussed that older individuals do not benefit from sleep as much as younger individuals do. Thus, it is hypothesized that applying physiologically-inspired stimulation could enhance memory consolidation in healthy older individuals.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
62

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable stroke

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2019

Typical duration for not_applicable stroke

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 20, 2019

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 18, 2022

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 19, 2022

Completed
12 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 13, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 6, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

May 6, 2023

Status Verified

April 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2.8 years

First QC Date

March 13, 2023

Last Update Submit

April 24, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Behavioural motor score (session 1)

    It is a computer-based score, which determines (compound) measure of accuracy and speed and can therefore be seen as a measure of performance improvement at session 1

    15 minutes

  • Behavioural motor score (session 2)

    It is a computer-based score, which determines (compound) measure of accuracy and speed and can therefore be seen as a measure of performance improvement at session 2

    15 minutes

  • Behavioural motor score (session 3)

    It is a computer-based score, which determines (compound) measure of accuracy and speed and can therefore be seen as a measure of performance improvement at session 3

    15 minutes

  • Behavioural motor score (session 4)

    It is a computer-based score, which determines (compound) measure of accuracy and speed and can therefore be seen as a measure of performance improvement at session 4

    15 minutes

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Behavioural motor score (session 5)

    15 minutes

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during behavioral motor score evaluation

    15 minutes

  • Electroencephalography (EEG) during sleep

    1 hour

Study Arms (4)

Slow-wave-like transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

EXPERIMENTAL

tDCS during sleep

Other: Non-invasive brain stimulation

Spindle-like transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)

EXPERIMENTAL

tACS during sleep

Other: Non-invasive brain stimulation

Sham stimulation during sleep

SHAM COMPARATOR

Sham

Other: Non-invasive brain stimulation

Wake in case participants could not take a nap

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Active Comparator (with stimulation), in case participants could not take a nap

Other: Non-invasive brain stimulation

Interventions

based on sleep-physiology (slow-wave and spindles)

Sham stimulation during sleepSlow-wave-like transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)Spindle-like transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)Wake in case participants could not take a nap

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • right handed (healthy older)
  • healthy (healthy older)
  • monohemispheric stroke (individuals after stroke)
  • at least 6 months since diagnosis stroke (individuals after stroke)

You may not qualify if:

  • Unable to provide informed consent
  • Pregnancy
  • Known or suspected non-compliance, drug or alcohol abuse
  • Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g., due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, etc. of the participant
  • Non-compliance to the instructions of the experimenter or an inappropriate behaviour hindering the normal progress of the experiment
  • Previous enrolment into the current study
  • Use of psychoactive medication, which might influence the study results
  • Request of not being informed in case of incidental findings
  • Recurrent stroke / multiple strokes (individuals after stroke)
  • Cerebellar stroke (individuals after stroke)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Campus Biotech

Geneva, 1202, Switzerland

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Full Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 13, 2023

First Posted

May 6, 2023

Study Start

March 20, 2019

Primary Completion

January 18, 2022

Study Completion

March 19, 2022

Last Updated

May 6, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-04

Locations