Sedation Methods in Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage: Procedure Quality and Recovery
Evaluation of Sedation Methods Used in Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage Procedures in Terms of Procedure Quality, Recovery Time, and Side Effects
1 other identifier
interventional
98
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This prospective, randomized, single-center study aims to evaluate and compare two different sedation and analgesia regimens used during percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) procedures. A total of 96 adult patients undergoing elective PTBD or biliary stenting will be randomized to receive either propofol-remifentanil or propofol-ketamine sedation. The primary outcome is recovery time assessed using the Modified Aldrete Score. Secondary outcomes include procedure quality, pain scores, patient and operator satisfaction, hemodynamic stability, and the incidence of sedation-related adverse events. The study is designed to determine the optimal sedation strategy for PTBD, particularly in fragile and elderly patient populations.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 12, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 30, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 10, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 10, 2026
CompletedJune 10, 2026
January 1, 2026
4 months
January 12, 2026
June 8, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Recovery Time
Time to achieve adequate recovery assessed using the Modified Aldrete Score.
From completion of the procedure until Modified Aldrete Score >8, assessed up to 30 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Hemodynamic Stability
Baseline, every 5 minutes during the procedure (assessed up to 60 minutes), and immediately after the procedure.
Pain Intensity
Baseline (pre-procedure), immediately after recovery, and at 30 minutes post-recovery.
Sedation Depth
Every 5 minutes during the procedure, assessed up to 30 minutes.
Adverse Events
Perioperatively and through the recovery period, assessed up to 30 minutes.
Patient and Operator Satisfaction
Immediately after the procedure
Study Arms (2)
Propofol-Remifentanil
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received intravenous propofol 0.5 mg/kg followed by a continuous intravenous remifentanil infusion initiated at 0.10-0.18 mcg/kg/min during the procedure. The remifentanil infusion rate was adjusted within the specified range according to clinical response to maintain adequate sedation, analgesia, and hemodynamic stability throughout the procedure.
Propofol-Ketamine
EXPERIMENTALIParticipants received intravenous propofol 0.5 mg/kg followed by intravenous ketamine 0.3 mg/kg. Additional intravenous ketamine 5 mg was administered every 5 minutes as needed during the procedure to maintain the target sedation level and hemodynamic stability.
Interventions
Intravenous propofol combined with remifentanil infusion for procedural sedation during percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage.
Intravenous propofol combined with ketamine bolus for procedural sedation during percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Scheduled for elective percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) and/or biliary stenting
- ASA physical status II-IV
- Fasting time of at least 6 hours prior to the procedure
- Ability to provide written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to provide informed consent or to complete study assessments (e.g., Ramsay Sedation Scale, FRAIL scale, Numeric Rating Scale)
- Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease
- Clinical diagnosis of demantia
- Known allergy or hypersensitivity to propofol, remifentanil, ketamine, ondansetron, or deksketoprofen
- Grade 3-4 aortic, mitral, or tricuspid valve disease
- Advanced or decompensated heart failure (ejection fraction \<25%)
- Emergency procedures
- Refusal to participate in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ankara Bilkent City Hospital
Ankara, Ankara, 06800, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 12, 2026
First Posted
June 10, 2026
Study Start
February 1, 2026
Primary Completion
May 30, 2026
Study Completion
June 10, 2026
Last Updated
June 10, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share