LAPOFAR Trial: Opioid-Free vs. Remifentanil Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
LAPOFAR
A Randomized Comparative Study of Opioid-Free Versus Opioid-Based Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Surgery
2 other identifiers
interventional
101
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study was a single-center, prospective, randomized clinical trial designed to compare the effects of opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) with standard opioid-based anesthesia during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The aim was to evaluate the impact of these two anesthetic approaches on postoperative pain, analgesic requirement, hemodynamic stability, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and recovery quality. A total of 101 patients, aged 18 to 65 years and classified as ASA I-II, undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were enrolled and randomized into two groups. The OFA group received intravenous lidocaine and dexmedetomidine, while the standard anesthesia (RA) group received a remifentanil-based protocol. All other anesthetic agents and surgical procedures were standardized across both groups. Intraoperative monitoring included heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and end-tidal CO₂, recorded at 5-minute intervals. Postoperative assessments included visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores at multiple time points (10, 20, 30, 60 minutes; 2, 12, and 24 hours), rescue analgesic use, incidence of PONV, and Modified Aldrete Scores at 0, 30, and 60 minutes. The results demonstrated that patients in the OFA group experienced significantly lower VAS pain scores in both early and late postoperative periods. The OFA group also required less rescue analgesia, had lower heart rate and blood pressure readings postoperatively, and showed a reduced incidence of PONV. Additionally, recovery parameters such as shorter time to extubation and higher early Aldrete scores favored the OFA group. These findings suggest that opioid-free anesthesia using lidocaine and dexmedetomidine is a safe and effective alternative to opioid-based anesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. It provides better postoperative pain control, reduces opioid-related side effects, and improves overall recovery. The study supports the potential for integrating OFA into enhanced recovery protocols and calls for further multicenter trials with larger sample sizes to validate and generalize the results.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 15, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 15, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 29, 2025
CompletedDecember 29, 2025
December 1, 2025
9 months
December 15, 2025
December 15, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Postoperative Pain Score (VAS)
VAS at multiple time points post-surgery
0-24 hrs
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Rescue Analgesic Use
0-24 hrs
PONV Incidence
0-24 hrs
Hemodynamic Monitoring
Intraoperative
Recovery Score (Aldrete)
0, 30, 60 min post-extubation
Extubation Time
Immediately after surgery
Study Arms (2)
Opioid-Free Anesthesia (OFA)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group received intravenous lidocaine and dexmedetomidine for opioid-free anesthesia. Lidocaine was administered as a 1.5 mg/kg bolus followed by a continuous infusion of 1.5 mg/kg/h. Dexmedetomidine was administered as a 0.5 µg/kg loading dose over 10 minutes, followed by an infusion of 0.5 µg/kg/h. No opioids were used intraoperatively. Standard induction with propofol and muscle relaxation with rocuronium were applied.
Opioid-Based Anesthesia (RA)
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in this group received standard general anesthesia with remifentanil infusion at 0.1-0.5 µg/kg/min. Anesthesia induction was performed using propofol and rocuronium. All other surgical and anesthetic parameters were standardized to match those of the OFA group.
Interventions
Participants received intravenous lidocaine and dexmedetomidine as part of the opioid-free anesthesia protocol. Lidocaine was administered as a 1.5 mg/kg bolus followed by continuous infusion at 1.5 mg/kg/h. Dexmedetomidine was administered as a 0.5 µg/kg loading dose over 10 minutes, followed by continuous infusion at 0.5 µg/kg/h until the end of surgery. No intraoperative opioids were given.
Participants received standard opioid-based anesthesia with continuous intravenous remifentanil infusion at 0.1-0.5 µg/kg/min. Induction and maintenance of anesthesia were standardized with propofol and rocuronium. All other perioperative conditions were matched to the OFA group.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18-65
- ASA I-II
- Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy
- Informed consent
- BMI 18-30 kg/m²
- Normal liver and renal function
You may not qualify if:
- Refusal to participate
- Allergy to study drugs
- Chronic opioid use
- Major organ disease
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Open surgery conversion
- Recent participation in another trial
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
SBÜ Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kırdar City Hospital
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Resident Physician, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 15, 2025
First Posted
December 29, 2025
Study Start
December 15, 2024
Primary Completion
September 1, 2025
Study Completion
December 1, 2025
Last Updated
December 29, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared publicly due to local data privacy regulations and institutional policy. Aggregate results will be available in published form.