NCT07307625

Brief Summary

This study was a single-center, prospective, randomized clinical trial designed to compare the effects of opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) with standard opioid-based anesthesia during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The aim was to evaluate the impact of these two anesthetic approaches on postoperative pain, analgesic requirement, hemodynamic stability, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and recovery quality. A total of 101 patients, aged 18 to 65 years and classified as ASA I-II, undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were enrolled and randomized into two groups. The OFA group received intravenous lidocaine and dexmedetomidine, while the standard anesthesia (RA) group received a remifentanil-based protocol. All other anesthetic agents and surgical procedures were standardized across both groups. Intraoperative monitoring included heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and end-tidal CO₂, recorded at 5-minute intervals. Postoperative assessments included visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores at multiple time points (10, 20, 30, 60 minutes; 2, 12, and 24 hours), rescue analgesic use, incidence of PONV, and Modified Aldrete Scores at 0, 30, and 60 minutes. The results demonstrated that patients in the OFA group experienced significantly lower VAS pain scores in both early and late postoperative periods. The OFA group also required less rescue analgesia, had lower heart rate and blood pressure readings postoperatively, and showed a reduced incidence of PONV. Additionally, recovery parameters such as shorter time to extubation and higher early Aldrete scores favored the OFA group. These findings suggest that opioid-free anesthesia using lidocaine and dexmedetomidine is a safe and effective alternative to opioid-based anesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. It provides better postoperative pain control, reduces opioid-related side effects, and improves overall recovery. The study supports the potential for integrating OFA into enhanced recovery protocols and calls for further multicenter trials with larger sample sizes to validate and generalize the results.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
101

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 15, 2024

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2025

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 15, 2025

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 29, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

December 29, 2025

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

December 15, 2025

Last Update Submit

December 15, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

DexmedetomidineLidocaineOpioid-Free AnesthesiaAnalgesic RequirementPostoperative Pain

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Postoperative Pain Score (VAS)

    VAS at multiple time points post-surgery

    0-24 hrs

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Rescue Analgesic Use

    0-24 hrs

  • PONV Incidence

    0-24 hrs

  • Hemodynamic Monitoring

    Intraoperative

  • Recovery Score (Aldrete)

    0, 30, 60 min post-extubation

  • Extubation Time

    Immediately after surgery

Study Arms (2)

Opioid-Free Anesthesia (OFA)

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in this group received intravenous lidocaine and dexmedetomidine for opioid-free anesthesia. Lidocaine was administered as a 1.5 mg/kg bolus followed by a continuous infusion of 1.5 mg/kg/h. Dexmedetomidine was administered as a 0.5 µg/kg loading dose over 10 minutes, followed by an infusion of 0.5 µg/kg/h. No opioids were used intraoperatively. Standard induction with propofol and muscle relaxation with rocuronium were applied.

Drug: Lidocaine + Dexmedetomidine

Opioid-Based Anesthesia (RA)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants in this group received standard general anesthesia with remifentanil infusion at 0.1-0.5 µg/kg/min. Anesthesia induction was performed using propofol and rocuronium. All other surgical and anesthetic parameters were standardized to match those of the OFA group.

Drug: Remifentanil

Interventions

Participants received intravenous lidocaine and dexmedetomidine as part of the opioid-free anesthesia protocol. Lidocaine was administered as a 1.5 mg/kg bolus followed by continuous infusion at 1.5 mg/kg/h. Dexmedetomidine was administered as a 0.5 µg/kg loading dose over 10 minutes, followed by continuous infusion at 0.5 µg/kg/h until the end of surgery. No intraoperative opioids were given.

Opioid-Free Anesthesia (OFA)

Participants received standard opioid-based anesthesia with continuous intravenous remifentanil infusion at 0.1-0.5 µg/kg/min. Induction and maintenance of anesthesia were standardized with propofol and rocuronium. All other perioperative conditions were matched to the OFA group.

Opioid-Based Anesthesia (RA)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18-65
  • ASA I-II
  • Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  • Informed consent
  • BMI 18-30 kg/m²
  • Normal liver and renal function

You may not qualify if:

  • Refusal to participate
  • Allergy to study drugs
  • Chronic opioid use
  • Major organ disease
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Open surgery conversion
  • Recent participation in another trial

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

SBÜ Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kırdar City Hospital

Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Postoperative Nausea and VomitingPain, Postoperative

Interventions

LidocaineDexmedetomidineRemifentanil

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsNauseaSigns and Symptoms, DigestiveSigns and SymptomsVomitingPainNeurologic Manifestations

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AcetanilidesAnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAminesImidazolesAzolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsPropionatesAcids, AcyclicCarboxylic AcidsPiperidines

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants were randomly assigned to one of two parallel intervention groups. One group received opioid-free anesthesia (lidocaine and dexmedetomidine infusion), while the other received standard opioid-based anesthesia (remifentanil). Each participant remained in their assigned group throughout the procedure and follow-up period. The study used a 1:1 allocation ratio and compared outcomes such as postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting, and recovery parameters.
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Resident Physician, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 15, 2025

First Posted

December 29, 2025

Study Start

December 15, 2024

Primary Completion

September 1, 2025

Study Completion

December 1, 2025

Last Updated

December 29, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

The individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared publicly due to local data privacy regulations and institutional policy. Aggregate results will be available in published form.

Locations