Remifentanil Monotherapy vs. Remifentanil-Nicardipine for Controlled Hypotension in Otolaryngological Surgery
The Effects of Remifentanil Monotherapy Versus Remifentanil-Nicardipine Combination on Advanced Hemodynamic Parameters for Controlled Hypotension During Otolaryngological Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Controlled hypotension is a widely employed technique in otolaryngological (ear, nose, and throat) surgery, primarily aimed at improving surgical field visibility and minimizing intraoperative blood loss. By maintaining mean arterial pressure within a targeted range, this approach facilitates a clearer operative field, reduces the need for blood transfusion, and shortens operative time, thereby contributing to improved surgical outcomes. Among the pharmacological agents used to achieve controlled hypotension, remifentanil - an ultra-short-acting synthetic opioid - has gained widespread acceptance due to its rapid onset, predictable offset, and favorable hemodynamic profile. Nicardipine, a second-generation dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, is also utilized for its potent vasodilatory properties and titratable antihypertensive effect. When used in combination, these two agents may offer complementary mechanisms of action; however, their combined impact on advanced hemodynamic parameters remains insufficiently characterized in the otolaryngological surgical setting. The primary aim of this study is to compare the effects of remifentanil monotherapy versus remifentanil-nicardipine combination therapy on advanced hemodynamic parameters, cardiac physiology, and tissue perfusion in patients undergoing controlled hypotension during otolaryngological surgery. Advanced hemodynamic monitoring - including parameters such as cardiac output, stroke volume, systemic vascular resistance, and oxygen delivery indices - will provide a more comprehensive physiological assessment beyond conventional blood pressure measurements. As secondary objectives, this study will evaluate and compare both regimens with respect to surgical field quality, surgeon satisfaction, intraoperative hemodynamic stability, and perioperative adverse effects. It is anticipated that a thorough comparative analysis of these two approaches will contribute to evidence-based anesthetic decision-making and help optimize patient safety and surgical outcomes in otolaryngological procedures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 11, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 22, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 30, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 15, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 30, 2026
June 22, 2026
June 1, 2026
2 months
June 11, 2026
June 16, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Cardiac Index (CI)
Cardiac Index measured via MOSTCARE hemodynamic monitor through radial arterial line (L/min/m²)
Perioperative period, approximately up to 3 hours (baseline through 5 minutes post-extubation
Stroke Volume Index(SVI)
Stroke Volume Index(SVI) measured via MOSTCARE hemodynamic monitor through radial arterial line (%)
Perioperative period, approximately up to 3 hours (baseline through 5 minutes post-extubation
Systemic Vascular Resistance Index (SVRI)
assessed via MOSTCARE hemodynamic monitor through radial arterial line
Perioperative period, approximately up to 3 hours (baseline through 5 minutes post-extubation
Cardiac Power Index (CPI)
assessed via MOSTCARE hemodynamic monitor through radial arterial line
Perioperative period, approximately up to 3 hours (baseline through 5 minutes post-extubation
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Heart Rate
Perioperative period, approximately up to 3 hours (baseline through 5 minutes post-extubation
Surgical Field Quality
Intraoperative period, approximately up to 2 hours
Incidence of Perioperative Adverse Events
Intraoperative and postoperative period, up to 24 hours
Study Arms (2)
Patients received Remifentanil
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients received Remifentanil-Nikardipin
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Co-administration of intravenous remifentanil and nicardipine infusions as part of a standardized protocol to induce and maintain controlled hypotension
Standard intravenous infusion of remifentanil to maintain controlled hypotension according to the routine anesthesia protocol.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged \> 18 years
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II
- Scheduled to undergo otolaryngological surgery under general anesthesia
- Provision of written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Aged \< 18 years
- ASA physical status III or higher
- Known severe cardiovascular (coronary artery disease, heart failure, uncontrolled hypertension), respiratory, renal, or hepatic disease
- Known allergy to the study drugs (remifentanil, nicardipine)
- Chronic use of beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, or any other medication affecting blood pressure
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Morbid obesity
- Emergency surgery requirement
- Refusal to participate in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Dicle Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Dicle University
Diyarbakır, Eyalet/Yerleşke, 21070, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (4)
Yunus MB. Fibromyalgia syndrome: new research on an old malady. BMJ. 1989 Feb 25;298(6672):474-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6672.474. No abstract available.
PMID: 2495074BACKGROUNDKim JY, Song SH, Cho JH, Cho HR. Comparison of clinical efficacy among remifentanil, nicardipine, and remifentanil plus nicardipine continuous infusion for hypotensive anesthesia during arthroscopic shoulder surgery. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2017 May-Aug;25(2):2309499017716251. doi: 10.1177/2309499017716251.
PMID: 28639533BACKGROUNDDegoute CS, Ray MJ, Manchon M, Dubreuil C, Banssillon V. Remifentanil and controlled hypotension; comparison with nitroprusside or esmolol during tympanoplasty. Can J Anaesth. 2001 Jan;48(1):20-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03019809.
PMID: 11212044BACKGROUNDMarik PE, Monnet X, Teboul JL. Hemodynamic parameters to guide fluid therapy. Ann Intensive Care. 2011 Mar 21;1(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2110-5820-1-1.
PMID: 21906322BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Medicine Doctor Associate Professor in Anesthesiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 11, 2026
First Posted
June 22, 2026
Study Start
June 30, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 15, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 30, 2026
Last Updated
June 22, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share