Safety and Performance Evaluation of the RonovoTM Robotic Surgical Platform in Oncological Procedures
CONSTELAR
Safety and Technical Evaluation of a Robotic Platform (RonovoTM) in Elective Oncological Surgery: A Prospective, Single-Arm, Multi-Specialty Registry
2 other identifiers
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
CONSTELAR is a prospective, single-arm, multi-specialty registry designed to evaluate the safety and intraoperative performance of the RonovoTM robotic surgical platform in adult patients undergoing elective oncological surgery. The study enrolls patients across four surgical specialties (Digestive Surgery, Thoracic Surgery, Urology, and Gynecology) at a single academic center. Primary endpoints include 30-day and 90-day complication rates (Clavien-Dindo classification), operative times, conversion rates, estimated blood loss, and device-related technical failures. Secondary endpoints encompass length of hospital stay, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission, readmission/reoperation rates, and oncological surgical outcomes (resection margins, lymph node harvest). The study aims to provide initial safety and feasibility data to support the regulatory pathway for the RonovoTM platform in Latin America.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 2, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 8, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 19, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2026
July 2, 2026
July 1, 2026
2 months
June 2, 2026
July 1, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
30-day postoperative complication rate (Clavien-Dindo classification)
Proportion of participants experiencing any postoperative complication within 30 days of surgery, graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system (Grades I-V).
30 days after surgery
Intraoperative conversion rate
Proportion of procedures requiring conversion from robotic approach to conventional laparoscopy or open surgery (laparotomy).
Intraoperative (day of surgery)
Device-related technical failure rate
Proportion of procedures in which a device technical failure occurred (hardware, software, camera/vision, connectivity, or power failure) and its clinical impact.
Intraoperative (day of surgery)
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Total operative time
Intraoperative (day of surgery)
Robot docking time
Intraoperative (day of surgery)
Robotic console time
Intraoperative (day of surgery)
Estimated blood loss
Intraoperative (day of surgery)
Length of hospital stay
Up to 90 days after surgery
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
RonovoTM Robotic Surgery
EXPERIMENTALAll enrolled participants undergo elective oncological surgery using the RonovoTM robotic surgical platform.
Interventions
The RonovoTM is a robotic surgical platform used to perform minimally invasive oncological surgical procedures. The surgeon operates from a console controlling robotic arms with endoscopic instruments. The platform is used for the complete surgical procedure from docking through console operation to undocking.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Confirmed malignancy diagnosis
- Elective indication for robotic approach using RonovoTM
- Able to understand and sign informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Formal contraindication to minimally invasive surgery
- Severe comorbidity prohibiting the procedure
- Refusal to participate or sign informed consent
- Emergency surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo - ICESP
São Paulo, São Paulo, 05403-010, Brazil
Related Publications (3)
Nandy K, Patkar S, Varty G, Shah T, Goel M. Outcomes of Robotic Surgery in a Single-institution, High-volume Hepatobiliary Oncology Unit. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2024 May;15(Suppl 2):289-296. doi: 10.1007/s13193-024-01873-6. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
PMID: 38818004BACKGROUNDLiu Y, Zhao Z, Xu P, Li Y, Chang W, Ji M. Initial experience with the Carina platform in robotic-assisted hysterectomy for gynecological malignant disease. Surg Endosc. 2025 Apr;39(4):2346-2353. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11588-6. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
PMID: 39966128BACKGROUNDPokhrel G, Wang Z, Cui J, Jin B, Zheng H, Tao J, Fan Y, Liu Y, Zhan Y, Yu S, Dong B, Zhang X. Initial experience with the novel modular robotic system Carina in urology: a prospective study on safety feasibility and surgical settings. Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 12;15(1):12686. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97411-7.
PMID: 40221629BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ulysses MD, PhD Ribeiro Jr
Instituto do Câncer do Estados de São Paulo (ICESP)
Central Study Contacts
Ulysses Ribeiro Júnior, Principal Investigator, MD, Ph
CONTACT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 2, 2026
First Posted
June 8, 2026
Study Start
June 19, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Last Updated
July 2, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
It has been decided not to share Individual Participant Data (IPD) related to the study for several reasons.Protecting the privacy of participants is a priority. Sharing IPD may expose sensitive information that, even when de-identified, can be traced back to individuals. Furthermore, the complexity of the data makes sharing challenging without the risk of misunderstandings or misinterpretations, which could compromise the integrity of the research. Sharing IPD without the explicit consent of participants may violate ethical principles of respect and protection. There is also a need to comply with regulatory guidelines governing data sharing to avoid potential legal issues. Finally, the focus will be on disseminating aggregated results that can benefit the scientific community and the public without compromising individual privacy.