NCT07591324

Brief Summary

the objective of this research is to compare the clinical effectiveness of the conventional lingual arch space maintainers with three-dimensional printed space maintainers.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
44

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
4mo left

Started Jan 2025

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress83%
Jan 2025Sep 2026

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 22, 2025

Completed
11 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 21, 2025

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 15, 2026

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2026

Expected
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2026

Last Updated

May 15, 2026

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

December 21, 2025

Last Update Submit

May 12, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

lingual arch spacemaintainer3D printed spacemaintainer

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Patient satisfaction and pain experienced using the Wong-Baker Faces Test

    Patient satisfaction and pain experienced during conventional and digital impression and cementation will be evaluated using the Wong-Baker Faces test and subsequently recorded for clinical satisfaction at 3 months, 6 months and 9 months for both patient groups to evaluate appliance acceptance and convenience for the patients.

    9 months

  • Gingival health will be evaluated using Sillness and Loe Gingival Index

    gingival health will be evaluated by Sillness and Loe Gingival Index Evaluation of the gingival health according to the (GI) described by (Loe and Silness, 1963): Score Criteria for the Gingival Index 0 No inflammation. 1. Mild inflammation: slight redness, slight edema, no bleeding on probing. 2. Moderate inflammation: redness, edema, glazing, bleeding on probing. 3. Severe inflammation: marked redness and edema, ulceration, and a tendency of spontaneous bleeding.

    9 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Impression taking experience for the patient assessed by 6-questions survey

    Day 1

Study Arms (2)

Group I

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Conventional spacemaintainer

Device: Conventional spacemaintainer

Group II

EXPERIMENTAL

3D printed spacemaintainer

Device: 3D printed spacemaintainer

Interventions

Two bands will be selected and checked for fit and adaptation around the distal abutment teeth, then an alginate impression will be taken and will be sent to the laboratory for fabrication

Group I

An intraoral scan for the patients' lower arch will be taken using a 3D digital dental scanner.

Group II

Eligibility Criteria

Age7 Years - 9 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Apparently, healthy cooperative children have recently prematurely loss of more than one mandibular primary molar in any of the quadrants, full erupted mandibular first permanent molars in both sides, and whose lower permanent incisors have erupted
  • The permanent successors of the lost primary molars were not expected to erupt within 6 months
  • Angle's class 1 occlusion with normal primary molar relation
  • Caries-free and periodontally healthy abutment teeth
  • Absence of parafunctional habits or abnormal occlusion conditions such as crossbite, open bite, or deep bite.
  • Children's age ranges from 7 to 9 years-old
  • Radiographically, presence of permanent successors, more than one millimeter of bone covering the successor tooth germ, and/or only about one-third of the root of the permanent tooth has been formed.
  • Parents and children were accepting the new treatment modality.

You may not qualify if:

  • children exhibited poor oral hygiene, para-functional oral habits, severe crowding, space loss, and abnormal occlusion
  • Extraction of primary molars exceeding three months.
  • Radiographically, absence of permanent successor.
  • uncooperative children

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Suez Canal University

Ismailia, Ismailia Governorate, 41522, Egypt

RECRUITING

Related Publications (1)

  • Garg A, Samadi F, Jaiswal JN, Saha S. 'Metal to resin': a comparative evaluation of conventional band and loop space maintainer with the fiber reinforced composite resin space maintainer in children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2014 Apr-Jun;32(2):111-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.130783.

    PMID: 24739908BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

PainAnxiety Disorders

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsMental Disorders

Central Study Contacts

Reham M. Assistant Professor, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 21, 2025

First Posted

May 15, 2026

Study Start

January 22, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Last Updated

May 15, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

may be after publishing

Locations