the Objective of This Research is to Compare the Clinical Effectiveness of the Conventional Lingual Arch Space Maintainers With Three-dimensional Printed Space Maintainers.
Comparative Evaluation of the Conventional and Three-Dimensional Printed Lower Lingual Arch Space Maintainers A Randomized Clinical Trial
2 other identifiers
interventional
44
1 country
1
Brief Summary
the objective of this research is to compare the clinical effectiveness of the conventional lingual arch space maintainers with three-dimensional printed space maintainers.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 22, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 21, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 15, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2026
May 15, 2026
December 1, 2025
1.5 years
December 21, 2025
May 12, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Patient satisfaction and pain experienced using the Wong-Baker Faces Test
Patient satisfaction and pain experienced during conventional and digital impression and cementation will be evaluated using the Wong-Baker Faces test and subsequently recorded for clinical satisfaction at 3 months, 6 months and 9 months for both patient groups to evaluate appliance acceptance and convenience for the patients.
9 months
Gingival health will be evaluated using Sillness and Loe Gingival Index
gingival health will be evaluated by Sillness and Loe Gingival Index Evaluation of the gingival health according to the (GI) described by (Loe and Silness, 1963): Score Criteria for the Gingival Index 0 No inflammation. 1. Mild inflammation: slight redness, slight edema, no bleeding on probing. 2. Moderate inflammation: redness, edema, glazing, bleeding on probing. 3. Severe inflammation: marked redness and edema, ulceration, and a tendency of spontaneous bleeding.
9 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Impression taking experience for the patient assessed by 6-questions survey
Day 1
Study Arms (2)
Group I
ACTIVE COMPARATORConventional spacemaintainer
Group II
EXPERIMENTAL3D printed spacemaintainer
Interventions
Two bands will be selected and checked for fit and adaptation around the distal abutment teeth, then an alginate impression will be taken and will be sent to the laboratory for fabrication
An intraoral scan for the patients' lower arch will be taken using a 3D digital dental scanner.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Apparently, healthy cooperative children have recently prematurely loss of more than one mandibular primary molar in any of the quadrants, full erupted mandibular first permanent molars in both sides, and whose lower permanent incisors have erupted
- The permanent successors of the lost primary molars were not expected to erupt within 6 months
- Angle's class 1 occlusion with normal primary molar relation
- Caries-free and periodontally healthy abutment teeth
- Absence of parafunctional habits or abnormal occlusion conditions such as crossbite, open bite, or deep bite.
- Children's age ranges from 7 to 9 years-old
- Radiographically, presence of permanent successors, more than one millimeter of bone covering the successor tooth germ, and/or only about one-third of the root of the permanent tooth has been formed.
- Parents and children were accepting the new treatment modality.
You may not qualify if:
- children exhibited poor oral hygiene, para-functional oral habits, severe crowding, space loss, and abnormal occlusion
- Extraction of primary molars exceeding three months.
- Radiographically, absence of permanent successor.
- uncooperative children
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Suez Canal University
Ismailia, Ismailia Governorate, 41522, Egypt
Related Publications (1)
Garg A, Samadi F, Jaiswal JN, Saha S. 'Metal to resin': a comparative evaluation of conventional band and loop space maintainer with the fiber reinforced composite resin space maintainer in children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2014 Apr-Jun;32(2):111-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.130783.
PMID: 24739908BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 21, 2025
First Posted
May 15, 2026
Study Start
January 22, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2026
Last Updated
May 15, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
may be after publishing