Space Maintenance
10
3
5
3
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
100% trial completion (above average)
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
Moderate Risk
Score: 50/100
0.0%
0 terminated out of 10 trials
100.0%
+13.5% vs benchmark
10%
1 trials in Phase 3/4
0%
0 of 3 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.5%
Based on 3 completed trials
Clinical Trials (10)
Glass Fiber-Reinforced Composite Resin Versus Band-and-Loop Space Maintainers in Children: A Split-Mouth Clinical Study
Efficacy of Digital Versus Conventional Nance and Transpalatal Arch Appliances for Space Maintenance
3D-Printed Versus Band-and-Loop Versus Denovo Space Maintainers in Primary Dentition.
the Objective of This Research is to Compare the Clinical Effectiveness of the Conventional Lingual Arch Space Maintainers With Three-dimensional Printed Space Maintainers.
Evaluation of a 3D Printed Space Maintainer Versus the Conventional Band and Loop
Space Changes After Premature Loss of Lower First Primary Molars in Children Using Digital Scanning
Clinical Evaluation of 3-D Printed Partial Denture Space Maintainer
The Effects of Fixed Space Maintainers Luting with Self-Adhesive Resin Cement on the Gingival Crevicular Fluid of Interleukin-18 Level
TORNADO-Omics Techniques and Neural Networks for the Development of Predictive Risk Models
The Effectiveness of Combined Design Nance/Transpalatal Arch Appliance in Maintaining Arch Dimensions After Premature Extraction of Primary Molars