NCT07309679

Brief Summary

Dental plaque and gingivitis are common oral health problems among school children. Mechanical plaque control, such as tooth brushing, is essential but may be insufficient for maintaining optimal oral hygiene. Chlorhexidine mouthwash is considered the gold standard chemical plaque control agent; however, its long-term use is limited by side effects such as tooth staining and taste alteration. In recent years, herbal mouthwashes have gained attention as natural alternatives with fewer adverse effects. This randomized, single-blinded clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of two herbal mouthwashes - pomegranate peel extract and neem extract - compared with 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwash on oral health among school children aged 8-12 years in Mansoura City, Egypt. A total of 156 participants were divided into three groups based on the type of mouthwash used. Plaque index, gingival index, and salivary Streptococcus mutans levels were assessed at baseline and after three weeks. The study aimed to determine whether herbal mouthwashes could provide comparable benefits to chlorhexidine in reducing plaque, gingivitis, and bacterial load, while offering better safety and compliance in children.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
156

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2023

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 7, 2023

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 7, 2023

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 7, 2023

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 16, 2025

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 30, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

January 9, 2026

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

December 16, 2025

Last Update Submit

January 8, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Plaque Index (Silness & Löe)

    Outcome measure: Mean change in Plaque Index score (Silness \& Löe) from baseline to 3 weeks.

    baseline , 1 week , 2 weeks, 3 weeks

  • Gingival Index (Löe & Silness)

    Mean change in Gingival Index score (Löe \& Silness) from baseline to 3 weeks.

    baseline , 1 week , 2 weeks, 3 weeks

  • Salivary Streptococcus mutans Level

    Change in salivary Streptococcus mutans count (CFU/ml) from baseline to 3 weeks

    Baseline and 3 weeks after start of intervention

Study Arms (3)

Chlorhexidine Mouthwash Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants used 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwash . Each child rinsed with 5 ml twice daily (after breakfast and before bedtime) for 30 seconds under parental supervision for three weeks. This group served as the gold-standard control for evaluating the efficacy of herbal mouthwashes

Drug: Chlorhexidine Digluconate 0.2% Mouthwash

Pomegranate Peel Extract Mouthwash Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants used a pomegranate peel extract (Punica granatum Linn.) mouthwash, prepared at Nanogate company. Each child rinsed with 5 ml twice daily (after breakfast and before bedtime) for 30 seconds under parental supervision for three weeks. The purpose was to evaluate its natural antimicrobial and anti-gingivitis effects compared to chlorhexidine.

Drug: Pomegranate Peel Extract Mouthwash

Neem Extract Mouthwash Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants used a neem (Azadirachta indica) extract mouthwash, prepared at Nanogate company. Each child rinsed with 5 ml twice daily (after breakfast and before bedtime) for 30 seconds under parental supervision for three weeks. This group was designed to assess neem's potential antimicrobial and plaque-reducing effects relative to chlorhexidine and pomegranate mouthwashes.

Drug: Neem Extract Mouthwash

Interventions

Mouthwash containing neem extract (Azadirachta indica), prepared at Nanogate company. Participants rinsed with 5 ml twice daily for 30 seconds for three weeks under parental supervision. The intervention was designed to assess neem's antibacterial and plaque-reducing properties compared with chlorhexidine and pomegranate mouthwashes.

Also known as: Azadirachta indica Mouthrinse, Neem Herbal Mouthwash
Neem Extract Mouthwash Group

Commercially available 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate mouthwash used as the gold standard control. Participants rinsed with 5 ml twice daily (after breakfast and before bedtime) for 30 seconds under parental supervision for three weeks. Used to compare the antimicrobial and anti-plaque effectiveness against herbal mouthwashes.

Also known as: CHX, 0.2% CHX Mouthrinse
Chlorhexidine Mouthwash Group

Mouthwash containing pomegranate peel extract (Punica granatum Linn.), prepared at Nanogate company. Participants rinsed with 5 ml twice daily for 30 seconds for three weeks under parental supervision. The intervention aimed to evaluate pomegranate's natural anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial effects on plaque, gingivitis, and Streptococcus mutans levels

Also known as: PPE Mouthwash, Punica granatum Mouthrinse
Pomegranate Peel Extract Mouthwash Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age8 Years - 12 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Children aged 8 to 12 years (common age group for gingivitis).
  • Both male and female participants.
  • Plaque Index ≥ 1 according to Silness and Löe index.
  • Regular brushing habit (once per day).
  • Parental consent obtained prior to participation.

You may not qualify if:

  • Children with systemic diseases or conditions affecting salivary flow.
  • Children with a history of antibiotic use within the last month before the study.
  • Those with known allergy or intolerance to any mouthwash ingredients.
  • Children currently using any other mouthwash or oral antiseptic.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Faculty of Dentistry,Mansoura university

Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, 35516, Egypt

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

chlorhexidine gluconateMouthwashes

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Biomedical and Dental MaterialsSpecialty Uses of ChemicalsChemical Actions and UsesCosmeticsManufactured MaterialsTechnology, Industry, and Agriculture

Study Officials

  • Rabab I Salama, professor

    Faculty of Dentistry,Mansoura University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants were randomly assigned into three parallel groups, each receiving a different mouthwash: * Group I: Chlorhexidine (0.2%) * Group II: Pomegranate peel extract mouthwash * Group III: Neem extract mouthwash Each participant used only one type of mouthwash for the full 3-week study period. Comparisons were made between groups to evaluate differences in plaque index, gingival index, and salivary Streptococcus mutans levels.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 16, 2025

First Posted

December 30, 2025

Study Start

March 7, 2023

Primary Completion

June 7, 2023

Study Completion

November 7, 2023

Last Updated

January 9, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

individual participant data will not be shared because the study involves children and contains sensitive health information.only aggregated results will be published.

Locations