Effect of Anterior Iliac Block on Postoperative Analgesia and Patient Satisfaction in Inguinal Hernia Repair Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures worldwide and presents challenges in anesthesia selection and postoperative pain management. Spinal anesthesia is frequently preferred due to its advantages, such as avoiding neuromuscular blockers and endotracheal intubation. Effective postoperative analgesia is essential for improving patient comfort and reducing opioid consumption. The anterior iliac block, a recently described technique, has emerged as a potential alternative to conventional regional anesthesia methods, offering wider nerve coverage and possibly improved analgesia. However, evidence regarding its efficacy and safety remains limited. This study aims to evaluate the effect of the anterior iliac block on postoperative analgesia duration and patient satisfaction in patients undergoing inguinal hernia surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2026
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 9, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 16, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 30, 2026
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2027
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2027
April 16, 2026
April 1, 2026
1 year
April 9, 2026
April 9, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Duration of Postoperative Analgesia
Time from completion of spinal anasthesia to the first request for rescue analgesia
Up to 24 hours postoperative
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Postoperative Pain Scores
At 3, 6, 12 and 24 hours postoperative
Total Oioid Consumption
First 24 hours postoperative
Patient Satisfaction
At 24 hours postoperatively
Study Arms (2)
Anterior Iliac Block Group
EXPERIMENTALPatients will receive spinal anesthesia combined with anterior iliac block for postoperative analgesia
Control Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will receive spinal anesthesia without anterior iliac block and standard postoperative analgesia
Interventions
Patients in this group received an ultrasound-guided anterior iliac block following the completion of surgery under spinal anesthesia. The block was performed under sterile conditions with the patient in the supine position. Using a high-frequency linear ultrasound probe, the anatomical landmarks in the anterior iliac region were identified, and the relevant fascial plane was visualized. A block needle was advanced in-plane under real-time ultrasound guidance, and after negative aspiration, an appropriate volume(20 ml 0.25%) of local anesthetic was injected to ensure adequate spread within the target plane. All procedures were performed by experienced anesthesiologists. Postoperative analgesia was assessed using standardized pain scores, and additional analgesic requirements were recorded. The duration of analgesia and patient satisfaction were evaluated during the postoperative period.
Patients in this group did not receive an anterior iliac block. All patients underwent surgery under spinal anesthesia, and no additional postoperative analgesic intervention was administered routinely. Analgesic medication was provided only if required based on patient-reported pain levels. Pain scores, time to first analgesic requirement, total analgesic consumption, and patient satisfaction were assessed during the postoperative period using the same standardized methods as in the intervention group.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years patient
- American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA) I-II patient
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who declined to participate in the study
- Patients with contraindications to the anterior iliac block
- Pregnant or breastfeeding patients
- Patients classified as ASA III, IV, or V
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Şanlıurfa Mehmet Akif İnan Training and Research Hospital
Sanliurfa, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (3)
Burney RE, Prabhu MA, Greenfield ML, Shanks A, O'Reilly M. Comparison of spinal vs general anesthesia via laryngeal mask airway in inguinal hernia repair. Arch Surg. 2004 Feb;139(2):183-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.139.2.183.
PMID: 14769578RESULTCallesen T. Inguinal hernia repair: anaesthesia, pain and convalescence. Dan Med Bull. 2003 Aug;50(3):203-18.
PMID: 13677240RESULTYorukoglu HU, Cesur S, Izgin Avci I, GoK A, Aksu C, Selek O, Kus A. Retrospective evaluation of postoperative analgesia efficacy of a new technique in anterior iliac crest bone graft harvesting: anterior iliac block. BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Nov 29;24(1):443. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02829-7.
PMID: 39609729RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
ABDULLAH ŞENGÜL, MD
Şanlıurfa Mehmet Akif İnan Training and Research Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Specialist Of Anesthesiology And Reanimation
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 9, 2026
First Posted
April 16, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
April 30, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
April 30, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
April 30, 2027
Last Updated
April 16, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Ethics committee approval covers only aggregate data analysis; there is no permission to share individual participant data