NCT07327801

Brief Summary

Neuraxial anesthesia is a commonly employed technique for subumbilical surgical procedures due to its effectiveness and safety profile. The advent of ultrasound technology has introduced the possibility of visualizing anatomical landmarks in real time, thereby facilitating more accurate and potentially safer subarachnoid punctures. This study aims to compare conventional spinal anesthesia, based on palpation, with ultrasound-guided spinal anesthesia, focusing on procedural ease and overall facilitation. it's a prospective, single-center, randomized, single-blind study. We included patients aged 18 years or older, classified as ASA I or II, scheduled for elective surgery, and who provided written informed consent. Exclusion criteria included failed subarachnoid puncture, conversion to general anesthesia, or the occurrence of major intraoperative complications such as vasovagal episodes or cardiac rhythm disturbances. Participants were randomly assigned, based on a randomization table, into two groups: Group1 (traditional technique), in which spinal anesthesia was performed using the conventional palpation-based method for space localization; and Group2 (ultrasound-guided technique), in which spinal anesthesia was performed under real-time ultrasound guidance. The primary outcome was the total procedure time, measured in seconds from the end of skin antisepsis to the initiation of subarachnoid injection. Secondary outcomes included the number of puncture attempts, the number of needle redirections within the same interspace, the occurrence of procedural incidents, and postoperative complaints such as radicular pain, osseous contact pain, intraoperative paresthesias, and traumatic punctures.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
136

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2025

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 31, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 30, 2025

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 25, 2025

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 8, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

January 8, 2026

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

December 25, 2025

Last Update Submit

December 25, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • procedure time

    60sec

Study Arms (2)

Conventional spinal anesthesia

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The operator began by palpating the posterior superior iliac spines to mentally determine the Tuffier's line, which roughly corresponds to the L4-L5 intervertebral space. The spinous processes were then palpated to precisely locate the targeted intervertebral space. The needle was subsequently inserted until cerebrospinal fluid return was obtained, and the anesthetic agent was administered slowly

Device: Conventional spinal anesthesia

Ultrasound-guided spinal anesthesia

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The operator set up the sterile equipment, which included an ultrasound machine equipped with a low-frequency convex probe (2-5 MHz). The probe, previously disinfected, was covered with a sterile sheath containing sterile coupling gel. First, the transducer was positioned in a paramedian sagittal plane, placed 1-2 cm lateral to the spinous processes. The sacrum was identified as a flat, hyperechoic structure producing a marked acoustic shadow, serving as the starting landmark for identifying successive lumbar intervertebral spaces. By gradually sliding the transducer cephalad, the vertebral laminae appeared as hyperechoic lines alternating with their posterior acoustic shadows. The interlaminar spaces, located between two adjacent laminae, form true acoustic windows that allow visualization of the underlying neuraxial structures. The exploration continued until the intervertebral space deemed optimal for puncture was identified. The probe was then switched to a midline posit

Device: Ultrasound-guided spinal anesthesia

Interventions

A combined sequence was used, beginning with a longitudinal paramedian scan, followed by a 90-degree rotation to obtain a transverse interspinous view. This allowed for the identification of the spinal canal, after which the puncture was performed using dynamic, out-of-plane guidance

Ultrasound-guided spinal anesthesia

The spinous processes were then palpated to precisely locate the targeted intervertebral space

Conventional spinal anesthesia

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients aged 18 years or older.
  • Classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II.
  • Scheduled for elective surgery under spinal anesthesia.
  • Provided written informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Failed subarachnoid puncture.
  • Conversion to general anesthesia.
  • Occurrence of major intraoperative complications (e.g., vasovagal episodes, cardiac rhythm disturbances).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Military Hospital of Tunis

Tunis, Tunisia

Location

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 25, 2025

First Posted

January 8, 2026

Study Start

February 1, 2025

Primary Completion

May 31, 2025

Study Completion

July 30, 2025

Last Updated

January 8, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-12

Locations