NCT06972485

Brief Summary

The frequency of hypotension is increased in geriatric patients due to physiological changes compared to the normal population. In this study, our aim is to compare the hemodynamic changes in geriatric patients undergoing hip surgery under spinal anesthesia with hypobaric and hyperbaric bupivacaine.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
70

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 30, 2025

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 15, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 15, 2025

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 27, 2025

Completed
3 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 30, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

January 5, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

April 30, 2025

Last Update Submit

December 30, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Geriatric patientHemodynamic changesHypobaric bupivacainehyperbaric bupivacaine

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Hemodynamic effects of hypobaric and hyperbaric bupivacaine with spinal anesthesia

    blood pressure monitoring

    2 hour

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Evaluation of sensorial block with hypobaric and hyperbaric bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia

    2 hour

  • Evaluation of motor block with hypobaric and hyperbaric bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia

    2 hour

Study Arms (2)

HypoB

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In the HypoB group, spinal anesthesia will be administered intrathecally using 3 cc of hypobaric bupivacaine solution in the lateral decubitus position, with the fractured side positioned upward.The patients will then be kept in the lateral position for 15 minutes. The patients' hemodynamic data , bilateral sensory and motor block levels will be recorded.

Procedure: spinal anesthesia

HyperB

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In the HyperB group, spinal anesthesia will be administered intrathecally using 3 cc of hyperbaric bupivacaine solution in the lateral decubitus position, with the fractured side positioned downward.The patients will then be kept in the lateral position for 15 minutes. The patients' hemodynamic data, bilateral sensory, and motor block levels will be recorded.

Procedure: spinal anesthesia

Interventions

spinal anesthesia with hypobaric and hyperbaric bupivacaine

HyperBHypoB

Eligibility Criteria

Age65 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients over 65 years of age
  • Patients taken to surgery in a supine position due to femur fractures
  • Patients classified as ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) class I-III

You may not qualify if:

  • History of allergy to the drug
  • Patients with coagulopathy
  • Patients refusing to participate in the study
  • Severe valve stenosis
  • Infection at the injection site
  • Inadequate spinal anesthesia level during surgery

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Eskişehir Osmangazi University

Eskişehir, Odunpazari, 26040, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Herrera R, De Andres J, Estan L, Olivas FJ, Martinez-Mir I, Steinfeldt T. Hemodynamic impact of isobaric levobupivacaine versus hyperbaric bupivacaine for subarachnoid anesthesia in patients aged 65 and older undergoing hip surgery. BMC Anesthesiol. 2014 Oct 24;14:97. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-14-97. eCollection 2014.

    PMID: 25371654BACKGROUND
  • Uppal V, Retter S, Shanthanna H, Prabhakar C, McKeen DM. Hyperbaric Versus Isobaric Bupivacaine for Spinal Anesthesia: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis for Adult Patients Undergoing Noncesarean Delivery Surgery. Anesth Analg. 2017 Nov;125(5):1627-1637. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002254.

    PMID: 28708665BACKGROUND
  • Gong C, Ye X, Liao Y, Ye P, Zheng T, Zheng X. Hypotension after unilateral versus bilateral spinal anaesthesia: A Systematic review with meta-analysis. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2025 Mar 1;42(3):203-223. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002098. Epub 2024 Nov 21.

    PMID: 39575900BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Anesthesia, Spinal

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Anesthesia, ConductionAnesthesiaAnesthesia and Analgesia

Study Officials

  • Sacit Güleç, Professor

    Eskisehir Osmangazi University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Intervention will be performed in geriatric patients of hemodynamic changes (hypotension, bradycardia) associated with spinal anesthesia
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Research assistant

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 30, 2025

First Posted

May 15, 2025

Study Start

May 15, 2025

Primary Completion

December 27, 2025

Study Completion

December 30, 2025

Last Updated

January 5, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-04

Locations