The Effect of an Intrinsic Motivation-Based Mock Interview Workshop on Career Decision-Making Self-Efficacy in Nursing Students
1 other identifier
interventional
155
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This single-group pretest-posttest pilot study evaluates the effect of a mock interview workshop, grounded in Self-Determination Theory, on career decision-making self-efficacy (CDMSE) and interview performance among first-year undergraduate nursing students in China. The 6-hour workshop consisted of four stages designed to support autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Participants (N=155) completed validated CDMSE scales and mock interview evaluations before and after the intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 21, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 6, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 6, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 20, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 31, 2026
CompletedMarch 31, 2026
March 1, 2026
3 months
March 20, 2026
March 25, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Career Decision-Making Self-Efficacy (CDMSE)
Career decision-making self-efficacy is assessed using the Chinese version of the Career Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Scale (Peng \& Long, 2001). This 39-item scale measures confidence in completing career-related tasks across five subscales: Self-Appraisal (6 items), Occupational Information Gathering (9 items), Goal Selection (9 items), Planning (8 items), and Problem-Solving (7 items). Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("no confidence at all") to 5 ("complete confidence"). Total scores range from 39 to 195, with higher scores indicating greater career decision-making self-efficacy. The scale demonstrated excellent internal consistency in this study (Cronbach's α = 0.912).
Baseline; Week 2
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Job Search Self-Efficacy (JSSE)
Baseline; Week 2
Mock Interview Performance
Baseline; Week 2
Study Arms (1)
Intrinsic Motivation-Based Mock Interview Workshop Group
EXPERIMENTALThis single-arm study consists of a structured mock interview workshop grounded in Self-Determination Theory (SDT), targeting three psychological needs: autonomy, competence, and relatedness. The intervention is delivered over two weeks, totaling 6 class-hours (45 minutes per class-hour), divided into four stages: (1) Activating Autonomy in Career Decision-Making: interactive lecture on interview skills, resume preparation, and simulated job postings; (2) Demonstrating Competence in Career Decision-Making: live mock interview with structured questions and immediate feedback from interviewers; (3) Fostering Peer Support in Career Decision-Making: small-group role-playing (6 students per group) with peer discussion and experience sharing; (4) Reflective Rehearsal: recorded video self-introduction submitted for independent evaluation. All participants receive the same intervention.
Interventions
This behavioral intervention is a structured mock interview workshop grounded in Self-Determination Theory (SDT), designed to enhance nursing students' career decision-making self-efficacy by supporting three basic psychological needs: autonomy, competence, and relatedness. The intervention is delivered over two consecutive weeks, totaling 6 class-hours (45 minutes per class-hour). The workshop consists of four stages: Stage 1 (45 min) - Activating Autonomy in Career Decision-Making: Interactive lecture covering interview attire, resume writing, and pre-interview preparation; simulated job postings are distributed. Stage 2 (90 min) - Demonstrating Competence in Career Decision-Making: Live mock interviews where students respond to structured questions from two interviewers; performance is evaluated using the Mock Interview Evaluation Scale. Stage 3 (90 min) - Fostering Peer Support in Career Decision-Making: Small-group role-playing (6 students per group) where students rotate roles
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- First-year undergraduate nursing students enrolled in a full-time program at the participating university
- Willing to participate in the study and provide written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Failure to complete all four stages of the mock interview workshop
- Failure to complete either pre-intervention or post-intervention questionnaires within the stipulated timeframe
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
School of Nursing, China Medical University
Shenyang, Liaoning, 110122, China
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- This is a single-group study with no masking. Pre- and post-intervention assessments were conducted by different instructors, but no blinding was applied.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Doctoral Researcher, School of Nursing, China Medical University
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 20, 2026
First Posted
March 31, 2026
Study Start
March 21, 2025
Primary Completion
June 6, 2025
Study Completion
June 6, 2025
Last Updated
March 31, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data will not be shared due to privacy and ethical restrictions. The study involved nursing students from a single university, and the informed consent obtained did not include provisions for data sharing beyond the scope of this study. Additionally, the dataset contains potentially identifiable information (e.g., age, gender, educational background), and sharing such data without explicit consent would not comply with the institutional ethics committee approval (China Medical University Ethics Committee, Approval No: \[2025\]173).