The Effect of Discharge Education Given With Two Different Teaching Techniques on Students
Evaluation of the Effect of Discharge Education Given With Two Different Teaching Techniques on Students' Self-Efficacy and Satisfaction Levels: A Randomized Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
146
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to examine the effects of PechaKucha and TeachBack teaching techniques, used in the instruction of the "Discharge Education" course for nursing students, on students' knowledge levels and self-efficacy regarding discharge education, as well as their satisfaction with the teaching method.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 25, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 31, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 31, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 23, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 29, 2025
CompletedJanuary 29, 2025
January 1, 2025
4 months
January 23, 2025
January 23, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Self-efficacy level
To determine students' self-efficacy, the General Self-Efficacy Scale was used. This scale was developed by Sherer et al. (1982), and its Turkish validity and reliability study was conducted by Yıldırım and İlhan (2010). The scale follows a 5-point Likert format (1: Not at all, 5: Very well) and consists of 17 items. As the score obtained from the scale increases, general self-efficacy also increases. The minimum possible score is 17, while the maximum is 85. The internal consistency coefficient (Cronbach's alpha) of the scale was calculated as 0.80. Necessary permissions were obtained for the use of the General Self-Efficacy Scale.
The scale was administered to students before and after the Discharge Education course. It takes approximately 10 minutes to complete.
Satisfaction level
To determine students' satisfaction levels, the Adult Education Satisfaction Scale was used. This scale was developed and its validity and reliability study conducted by Yüksekbilgili et al. (2016). It consists of 30 items and includes six sub-dimensions: "Instructor's Presentation Skills, Instructor's Communication Skills, Learning Environment, Training Organization, Training Objectives, Training Outcomes, and General Evaluation." The scale uses a 5-point Likert format (1 = Strongly Disagree, 5 = Strongly Agree). As the score obtained from the scale increases, satisfaction levels also increase. The minimum possible score is 30, while the maximum is 150. The internal consistency coefficient (Cronbach's alpha) of the scale was calculated as 0.94. Necessary permissions were obtained before using the Adult Education Satisfaction Scale
The scale was administered to students after the completion of the Discharge Education course. It took approximately 10 minutes to complete.
Knowledge level
To assess students' knowledge level regarding "Discharge Education," a multiple-choice test (with five options) consisting of 10 questions was developed by the researcher. The test is evaluated on a 100-point scale, with each correct answer worth 10 points. Before administering the Discharge Education Knowledge Test, expert opinions were obtained from five faculty members using the DAVIS method.
The test was administered to students before and after the Discharge Education course. It takes approximately 15 minutes to complete.
Study Arms (2)
Group 1. PechaKucha
EXPERIMENTALThe students in Group 1 were taught the Discharge Education course using the PechaKucha teaching technique. PechaKucha, which translates to "chatter" or "chit-chat" in Japanese, was first introduced in 2003 in Tokyo within the field of architecture. It was initially used by architects to present new projects and structures and to exchange ideas. This method is a fast-paced, innovative teaching and presentation technique that consists of 20 slides, each containing minimal text and authentic visual metaphors. Each slide is displayed for 20 seconds using an automatic timer, making the total presentation 6 minutes and 40 seconds long. In Power Point presentations, this timing can be set by selecting the Transitions tab and adjusting the duration to 20 seconds for all slides. The goal of this method is to make presentations more dynamic, engaging, and enjoyable.
Group 2. TeachBack
EXPERIMENTALThe students in Group 2 were taught the Discharge Education course using the TeachBack teaching technique. The TeachBack method, also known as the "Tell Me What You Learned" technique, is a dynamic and interactive learning and teaching process. The primary goal of the TeachBack method is to ensure that the given education is correctly understood by having participants explain it back to the educator in their own words. If the purpose of the education is to teach a specific skill, the goal is to observe whether the learner can correctly perform the intended skill. This method helps eliminate communication barriers by allowing for immediate feedback on misunderstood or incomplete information while reinforcing correct knowledge. It serves as an effective teaching strategy to evaluate the extent of understanding, ensuring that learners fully grasp the subject matter.
Interventions
The Discharge Education course was taught using the PechaKucha technique.
The Discharge Education course was taught using the TeachBack technique.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Being a 2nd-year student at the Gülhane Faculty of Nursing, Saglık Bilimleri University
- Willing to participate in the study
- Being over 18 years old
- Taking the Surgical Diseases Nursing course for the first time
You may not qualify if:
- Wishing to withdraw from the study at any stage
- Incomplete completion of the data collection form related to the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Saglık Bilimleri University
Keçiören, Ankara, 06010, Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yağmur Kayın, RN
Saglık Bilimleri University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Bediye Öztaş, Ph. D
Saglık Bilimleri University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- A total of 180 nursing students enrolled in the 2nd-year Surgical Diseases Nursing course were randomized into two groups based on their 1st-year cumulative academic grade point average by an independent statistician, separate from the study and the data obtained was analyzed by a statistician who was independent of the study and not involved in its implementation.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Registered Nurse
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 23, 2025
First Posted
January 29, 2025
Study Start
June 25, 2024
Primary Completion
October 31, 2024
Study Completion
October 31, 2024
Last Updated
January 29, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share