Preliminary Testing and Development of a Short Digital Intervention for Patients on Waiting Lists for Psychological Treatment
Developing a Web-based Transdiagnostic Single Session Intervention for Patients on Waiting Lists for Psychological Treatment: a Randomized Pilot Feasibility Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this randomized pilot feasibility trial is to assess the feasibility and further develop a single-session digital mental health intervention for patients on waiting lists for psychological treatment. The main aims are:
- 1.To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the study procedures and the digital single-session intervention.
- 2.To gather quantitative and qualitative feedback on the intervention to inform further development.
- 3.To collect preliminary data to refine the analysis plan for a main trial.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable depression
Started Mar 2026
Longer than P75 for not_applicable depression
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 16, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 24, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 30, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2034
May 1, 2026
April 1, 2026
6 months
March 16, 2026
April 27, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (10)
Recruitement rates through the study period as assessed by number of participants providing informed consent, and the time it takes to finish recruitment
This is part of evaluating the feasibility of the study procedures in preparation for a main trial
From Day 1 (recruitment initiation) until recruitment completion (recruitment target met or earlier termination). Expected duration: 2 months.
Number of participants invited to participate in the study throughout the study period and the frequency of invitations
This is part of evaluating the feasibility of the study procedures in preparation for a main trial
From Day 1 (recruitment initiation) until recruitment completion (recruitment target met or earlier termination). Expected duration: 2 months.
Number of participants screened for eligibility throughout the study period.
This is part of evaluating the feasibility of the study procedures in preparation for a main trial
From Day 1 (recruitment initiation) until recruitment completion (recruitment target met or earlier termination). Expected duration: 2 months.
Number of participants in each randomization arm.
This is part of evaluating the feasibility of the study procedures in preparation for a main trial
From Day 1 (recruitment initiation) until recruitment completion (recruitment target met or earlier termination). Expected duration: 2 months.
Number of responses to each questionnaire and intervention representing missing data patterns and attrition across arms and measurement points
This is part of evaluating the feasibility of the study procedures in preparation for a main trial
From Day 1 (recruitment initiation) until study completion. Expected duration: 3.5 months.
Number of participants who want to pull out of study or get data deleted throughout the study period
This is part of evaluating the feasibility of the study procedures in preparation for a main trial
From Day 1 (recruitment initiation) until study completion. Expected duration: 3.5 months.
Acceptability of interventions and active control conditions as measured by the PFS and TCQ.
The PFS (program feedback scale) is a 7 item, 5 point scaled questionnaire asking questions about acceptability of digital single session interventions. The questionnaire has been adapted to Norwegian. It includes two open-ended feedback questions in addition to the rating questions. The TCQ (treatment credibility questionnaire) is a 5 item 10 point rating scale of credibility of treatment rationales. It is adapted to Norwegian and modified to fit to a digital therapy program. Only the first two items of the questionnaire is chosen.
Assessed immediately after doing the intervention or the active control condition, which is on day 1-7 of the study period of 5 weeks. The passive control arm will not get these questions.
Time used to finish questionnaires and interventions
This is part of evaluating the feasibility of the study procedures in preparation for a main trial
On each questionnaire and intervention, totaling 6 measurement times.
Timing of answers to questionnaires and completion of the study
This is part of evaluating the feasibility of the study procedures in preparation for a main trial
From the start of invitation to the end of the study at 6 weeks.
Belief about positive or negative interaction with planned treatment
As measured through 5 point rating scales of two items asking participants who have started treatment whether they believe the intervention will have a negative and/ or positive interaction with their current treatment.
Asked at each measurement time after the baseline. This includes right after the intervention, at two week follow up and at 5 week follow up.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Self-reported depression and anxiety symptoms as assessed by PHQ-ADS
Two weeks and five weeks after enrollment controlled by baseline at enrollment
Study Arms (4)
Short digital therapy program group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants complete the short digital therapy program (30-40 minutes) and answer questions about acceptability, feedback and interaction with other therapy.
Long digital therapy program group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants complete the long digital therapy program (45-55 minutes) and answer questions about acceptability, feedback and interaction with other therapy.
Mental health advice group
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants receive advice and information intended to support mental health but do not complete the digital therapy program. They will still answer acceptability questions about the advice and interaction with therapy.
Questionnaire group
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants do not receive any intervention materials and only complete mental health questionnaires. They will not answer acceptability questions.
Interventions
This is a brief digital mental health program lasting for 30-40 minutes and includes text, self-reflection questions, and therapeutic exercises. Participants will learn and reflect on worrying and rumination behavior and how it impacts their life. The program only lasts for one session and is not module based. The intervention has been designed by the research team and is under development. This intervention is nested within Digital therapy program (long).
This is a brief digital mental health program lasting for 45-55 minutes and includes text, self-reflection questions, and therapeutic exercises. Participants will learn and reflect on worrying, rumination, avoidance and rigid attention behavior and how it impacts their life. The program only lasts for one session and is not module based. The intervention has been designed by the research team and is under development.
ABC is a public health campaign about building and strengthening mental health for the entire population. The ABC messages: Do something active, do something together, and do something meaningful are meant to motivate people, municipalities, and organizations to take action to strengthen mental health. A description of the ABC framework is provided online by The Norwegian Directorate of Health and is implemented digitally as a set of advice ("ABC for god psykisk helse").
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Must have applied for help at The Student Welfare Organization in Oslo and Akershus (SiO Mental Health) through their website.
- Must meet SiO Mental health's general eligibility criteria. This includes an individual screening of applications. SiOs general policy is to provide help to all applicants as long as they fulfill the requirement of being a student in the Oslo or Akershus area.
- Must speak and write Norwegian.
- Internet access and sufficient digital literacy is assumed among the student population.
- Willingness to be randomized.
- Willingness to partake in the study.
- Willingness to have data stored and used for the purpose of the current study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Oslo
Oslo, Oslo, 0316, Norway
Related Publications (13)
Borkovec, T. D., & Nau, S. D. (1972). Credibility of Analogue Therapy Rationales. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 3(4), 257-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(72)90045-6
BACKGROUNDSchleider JL, Zapata JP, Rapoport A, Wescott A, Ghosh A, Kaveladze B, Szkody E, Ahuvia IL. Single-Session Interventions for Mental Health Problems and Service Engagement: Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2025 May;21(1):279-303. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081423-025033. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
PMID: 39874601BACKGROUNDRamos G, Hernandez-Ramos R, Taylor M, Schueller SM. State of the Science: Using Digital Mental Health Interventions to Extend the Impact of Psychological Services. Behav Ther. 2024 Nov;55(6):1364-1379. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2024.04.004. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
PMID: 39443071BACKGROUNDSchleider JL, Mullarkey MC, Weisz JR. Virtual Reality and Web-Based Growth Mindset Interventions for Adolescent Depression: Protocol for a Three-Arm Randomized Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Jul 9;8(7):e13368. doi: 10.2196/13368.
PMID: 31290406BACKGROUNDSmith KA, Ward T, Lambe S, Ostinelli EG, Blease C, Gant T, Gold SM, Holmes EA, Paccoud I, Vinnikova A, Klucken J, Uhlhaas PJ, Sanchez CG, Haining K, Boge K, Lahutina S, Tomelleri L, Ryan S, Torous J, Cipriani A. Engagement and attrition in digital mental health: current challenges and potential solutions. NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Jul 2;8(1):398. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01778-w.
PMID: 40604240BACKGROUNDLipschitz JM, Pike CK, Hogan TP, Murphy SA, Burdick KE. The engagement problem: A review of engagement with digital mental health interventions and recommendations for a path forward. Curr Treat Options Psychiatry. 2023 Sep;10(3):119-135. doi: 10.1007/s40501-023-00297-3. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
PMID: 38390026BACKGROUNDvan Dijk DA, Meijer RM, van den Boogaard TM, Spijker J, Ruhe HG, Peeters FPML. Worse off by waiting for treatment? The impact of waiting time on clinical course and treatment outcome for depression in routine care. J Affect Disord. 2023 Feb 1;322:205-211. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.11.011. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
PMID: 36372129BACKGROUNDSteinert C, Stadter K, Stark R, Leichsenring F. The Effects of Waiting for Treatment: A Meta-Analysis of Waitlist Control Groups in Randomized Controlled Trials for Social Anxiety Disorder. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2017 May;24(3):649-660. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2032. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
PMID: 27445199BACKGROUNDThielen FW, Ten Have M, de Graaf R, Cuijpers P, Beekman A, Evers S, Smit F. Long-term economic consequences of child maltreatment: a population-based study. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016 Dec;25(12):1297-1305. doi: 10.1007/s00787-016-0850-5. Epub 2016 May 6.
PMID: 27154047BACKGROUNDEldridge SM, Lancaster GA, Campbell MJ, Thabane L, Hopewell S, Coleman CL, Bond CM. Defining Feasibility and Pilot Studies in Preparation for Randomised Controlled Trials: Development of a Conceptual Framework. PLoS One. 2016 Mar 15;11(3):e0150205. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150205. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 26978655BACKGROUNDKe S, Zhang B, He Y, Zhou Y, Hu X, Fan Y, Wang M, Zhang Y, Wang C. Reconstruction Strategy for Upper Extremity Defects After Bone Tumor Resection Based on 3D Customized Bone Cement Mold. Surg Innov. 2024 Jun;31(3):307-317. doi: 10.1177/15533506241244493. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
PMID: 38606504BACKGROUNDPhilippe TJ, Sikder N, Jackson A, Koblanski ME, Liow E, Pilarinos A, Vasarhelyi K. Digital Health Interventions for Delivery of Mental Health Care: Systematic and Comprehensive Meta-Review. JMIR Ment Health. 2022 May 12;9(5):e35159. doi: 10.2196/35159.
PMID: 35551058BACKGROUNDABC for god psykisk helse. (2019, December 5). https://www.helsenorge.no/psykisk-helse/abc-for-god-psykisk-helse/
BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sverre U Johnson, PhD
University of Oslo
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Randomization is performed automatically without any human involvement. The automated system reflects the absence of researcher influence during assignment. For this reason, no "investigator" will be aware of the assigned treatments during data collection. Participants will be informed that randomization is part of the study procedures, but they will not be explicitly told which group they have been assigned to. Although participants may infer their group allocation based on the questionnaires or intervention, the presence of four groups and the overlap between intervention components (e.g., nesting), may create some uncertainty about group membership. This uncertainty may function as a form of soft blinding, at least during the early phase of study participation (e.g., the first week).
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of clinical psychology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 16, 2026
First Posted
March 30, 2026
Study Start
March 24, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2034
Last Updated
May 1, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Approximate start: 12.03.2027
- Access Criteria
- Simplified version of study Protocol is available on Open science framework (osf.io). Comprehensive study protocol can be made available upon reasonable requets. Simple SAP is available on osf.io. Simplified version of ICF can be shared upon reasonable requests. Analytic code will be made available after publication of study in peer review journal, and will be shared upon reasonable requests.
No IPD will be shared outside of the research team involved with this study.