Group-Based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Versus Active Control in University Students With Emotional Symptoms
ACT-EMA-RCT
Efficacy of a Group-Based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Protocol Compared to an Active Control in University Students With Emotional Symptoms: a Randomized Controlled Trial With an Ideographic Approach
1 other identifier
interventional
48
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study evaluates the efficacy of a group-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) protocol compared to a non-directive group therapy used as an active control condition in university students presenting moderate to moderate/high levels of emotional symptomatology. Emotional difficulties such as depressive and anxiety symptoms are highly prevalent among university students and may negatively affect academic performance, well-being, and long-term functioning. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is an evidence-based psychological intervention that aims to improve mental health by increasing psychological flexibility, the ability to act in accordance with personal values while remaining open to difficult internal experiences. Participants will be randomly assigned to either (1) a structured ACT group intervention or (2) a non-directive supportive group intervention that controls for therapeutic attention and group support factors. The primary hypothesis is that participants receiving ACT will show greater reductions in emotional symptoms and greater improvements in psychological flexibility compared to the active control group. Outcomes will include depressive and anxiety symptoms, psychological flexibility, repetitive negative thinking, and meaning in life. The study uses a multimethod assessment strategy combining traditional self-report questionnaires administered at baseline, post-intervention, and follow-up; Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) with daily and weekly measures during the intervention period; and qualitative interviews to explore participants' experiences.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable depression
Started Mar 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable depression
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 20, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 21, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2026
April 1, 2026
February 1, 2026
3 months
March 21, 2026
March 27, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in emotional symptoms measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4)
The Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) is a 4-item self-report scale assessing anxiety and depressive symptoms, with total scores ranging from 0 to 12. Higher scores indicate greater emotional symptom severity.
Daily and weekly assessments from Week 2 to Week 15; follow-up at Weeks 15 and 23
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Change in psychological flexibility and inflexibility measured by the Flexible and Inflexible Behavior Questionnaire (CCFI)
Daily and Weekly assessments from Week 2 to Week 15; follow-up at Weeks 15 and 23
Change in repetitive negative thinking measured by the Repetitive Negative Thinking Questionnaire-3 (RNT-3)
Daily and weekly assessments from Week 2 to Week 15; follow-up at Weeks 15 and 23
Change in anxiety symptoms measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7 total score)
Baseline (Week 1), after eligibility was confirmed (Week 2), post-treatment (Week 11), and follow-up at 4 and 12 weeks post-intervention (Weeks 15 and 23)
Change in depressive symptoms measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9 total score)
Baseline (Week 1), after eligibility was confirmed (Week 2), post-treatment (Week 11), and follow-up at 4 and 12 weeks post-intervention (Weeks 15 and 23)
Change in sense of purpose in life measured by the Purpose in Life Test (PIL-Test total score)
After eligibility was confirmed (Week 2), post-treatment (Week 11), and follow-up at 4 and 12 weeks post-intervention (Weeks 15 and 23).
Other Outcomes (1)
Perceived change and intervention acceptability
Post-treatment (Week 11)
Study Arms (2)
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)
EXPERIMENTALManualized brief group intervention based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), delivered in five in-person sessions of approximately 90 minutes each (detailed in appendices). The intervention aims to increase psychological flexibility through the core processes of the ACT model.
Non-Directive Group Therapy (NDT)
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup-based non-directive therapy of equal length and format to ACT (five 90-minute in-person sessions; detailed in appendices). The intervention provides a space for validation and support, replicating common psychotherapy factors such as empathy and active listening, without including specific clinical intervention techniques.
Interventions
Manualized brief group intervention delivered in five in-person 90-minute sessions. The objective is to increase psychological flexibility through the core processes of the ACT model.
Group-based non-directive intervention delivered in five in-person 90-minute sessions. It offers validation and supportive interaction, replicating common psychotherapy factors such as empathy and active listening, without including specific clinical techniques.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- University students aged 18 to 28 years.
- Score ≥8 on the PHQ-9.
- Score ≥8 on the GAD-7.
- Willingness to participate in a longitudinal study including pre-, post-, and follow-up assessments.
- Willingness to complete daily and weekly ecological momentary assessments (EMA).
- Provision of written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Suicide risk based on clinical indicators derived from PHQ-9 assessment.
- Self-reported history of psychotic disorders.
- Self-reported problematic substance use.
- Failure to provide informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Universidad de Montevideo
Montevideo, Montevideo Department, 11600, Uruguay
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Outcome assessors and data analysts will remain blinded to treatment allocation. Participants and therapists cannot be blinded due to the nature of the psychological interventions. Allocation codes will be concealed until completion of primary analyses.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director of the Bachelor's Program in Psychology at Universidad de Montevideo
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 21, 2026
First Posted
April 1, 2026
Study Start
March 20, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Last Updated
April 1, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- IPD will be available beginning 6 months after publication of the primary results and will remain available for a period of 5 years.
- Access Criteria
- IPD will be available to qualified academic researchers who submit a methodologically sound proposal and provide documentation of ethics approval, where applicable. Requests must be submitted to the Principal Investigator via email. Access will require signing a Data Use Agreement ensuring confidentiality and use solely for scientific research purposes.
De-identified individual participant data (IPD) underlying the results reported in publications will be shared. This includes coded sociodemographic variables and scores from the psychometric instruments used in the study. No direct identifiers or information that could reasonably lead to participant re-identification will be shared.