Effectiveness of an AI Scribe Compared to Routine Templates for Clinical Documentation in Orthopedic Consultations
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized study compares AI-generated clinical documentation with traditional dictation templates during orthopedic consultations. Patients are randomized to have their consultation documented using either an AI medical scribe or a routine dictation template. Outcomes include surgeon documentation time, administrative processing time, time from consultation to note delivery to the family physician, patient satisfaction, and documentation accuracy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 18, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 30, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 30, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 9, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 24, 2026
CompletedMarch 24, 2026
March 1, 2026
8 months
March 9, 2026
March 17, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Surgeon Documentation Time
Surgeon documentation time is defined as the total time spent completing clinical documentation associated with a patient encounter. It begins when the surgeon initiates documentation during or immediately after entering the consultation room and ends when the consultation note is finalized and ready for handover or processing. In the conventional group, this includes dictation or completion of templates following the patient encounter. In the AI scribe group, this includes real-time capture of the encounter, followed by surgeon review and correction of the generated note. This measure reflects the direct documentation workload and efficiency of the surgeon within the clinical workflow.
Per consultation visit, time is measured from initiation of documentation during the patient encounter to completion of the consultation note, assessed at a defined time point of Day 1 (same-day visit, perioperative timeframe).
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Administrative Processing Time
Per consultation visit, administrative time is measured from receipt of the surgeon's completed documentation to finalization and transmission of the consultation letter, assessed at a defined time point of Day 1 (same-day visit, perioperative period).
Documentation Accuracy
Within 7 days after completion of the consultation note.
Patient Satisfaction
Assessed at a clearly defined time point of Day 1, immediately after the consultation is completed, during the same visit and before the patient leaves the clinic (perioperative timeframe).
Study Arms (2)
AI Scribe Documentation
OTHEROrthopaedic consultation documentation generated using an AI medical scribe that records and transcribes the clinical encounter in real time
Standard Dictation Template Documentation
OTHEROrthopedic consultation documentation generated using routine surgeon dictation templates with administrative transcription and processing
Interventions
Use of an artificial intelligence-based medical scribe for automated clinical documentation
Standard clinical documentation using surgeon dictation templates and administrative transcription
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults attending an orthopaedic consultation for total hip arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty, and are able to provide informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Trauma cases or patients undergoing revision surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Orthopaedic Associates
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7J3C1, Canada
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 9, 2026
First Posted
March 24, 2026
Study Start
June 18, 2025
Primary Completion
January 30, 2026
Study Completion
January 30, 2026
Last Updated
March 24, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share