Notation Optimization Through Template Engineering
NOTE
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a randomized non-blinded controlled trial of a standard note template versus a redesigned note template using a simulated patient encounter and the electronic medical record.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 20, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 26, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 29, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 3, 2020
CompletedMarch 17, 2023
April 1, 2020
3 months
March 29, 2020
March 15, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Note length
Note length in line count.
Duration of note entry, up to 2 hours
Time to note completion
Time to note completion in minutes.
Duration of note entry, up to 2 hours
Note evaluation by authors using a likert scale
Likert-scale survey instrument evaluating perceived organization, structure, and efficiency of note.
Immediately after note entry, up to 1 hour
Note evaluation by reviewers using the Physician Documentation Quality Instrument
Physician Documentation Quality Instrument (PDQI-9) - validated note quality scale composed of 9 metrics. 1 is not at all. 5 is extremely.
Within 1 year
Study Arms (2)
Standard template
ACTIVE COMPARATORUsual outpatient progress note with standard Subjective Objective Assessment Plan (SOAP) format
New template
EXPERIMENTALThe assessment and plan section is placed in the beginning, subjective data grouped into the assessment section, and elements not related to the current presentation were deemphasized
Interventions
Residents assigned to document with new progress note template
Residents assigned to document with standard progress note template
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Residents who had open visit slots during their outpatient clinic time
You may not qualify if:
- None
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Johns Hopkins Outpatient Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287, United States
Related Publications (1)
Epstein JA, Cofrancesco J Jr, Beach MC, Bertram A, Hedian HF, Mixter S, Yeh HC, Berkenblit G. Effect of Outpatient Note Templates on Note Quality: NOTE (Notation Optimization through Template Engineering) Randomized Clinical Trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Mar;36(3):580-584. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06188-0. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
PMID: 32901441DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jeremy A Epstein, MD
Johns Hopkins University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 29, 2020
First Posted
April 3, 2020
Study Start
January 20, 2017
Primary Completion
April 26, 2017
Study Completion
December 1, 2018
Last Updated
March 17, 2023
Record last verified: 2020-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
There is no sensitive or protected information. I am able to share any aspect of this trial to whomever would like to know more.