LLM-Assisted vs Manual Writing for Clinical Documentation: Effects on Time and Quality
Evaluating an LLM-Assisted Workflow for Clinical Documentation: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial on Time and Quality
1 other identifier
interventional
21
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether an LLM-assisted writing workflow can reduce the time to complete hospital discharge summaries and discharge referrals and maintain or improve document quality compared with writing from scratch by clinicians. The study used six simulated patient records (no real patient data). The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does the LLM-assisted writing workflow reduce the time needed to complete each document compared with manual writing?
- Does the LLM-assisted writing workflow improve (or at least maintain) document quality compared with manual writing, as rated by blinded experts? Researchers will compare LLM-assisted versus manual writing to see if the LLM-assisted approach is faster and has equal or better quality. LLM-only drafts (unedited first drafts) will be evaluated as a separate third group to understand the baseline quality of LLM output without clinician edits. Participants will create two documents-a discharge summary and a discharge referral-for each of six simulated cases. Those assigned to CocktailAI \& Modification group will use an LLM assistant (called CocktailAI) to generate a first draft for each document and then review and edit it to finalize; those assigned to the control group will write each document from scratch without LLM assistance.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 18, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 14, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 16, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 2, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 22, 2025
CompletedSeptember 22, 2025
September 1, 2025
24 days
September 2, 2025
September 18, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Average time spent creating each document
In the CocktailAI \& Modification group and the Control group, the time spent creating documents is measured in seconds. In the CocktailAI group, the time required for document generation is measured in seconds.
On one study day within 2 weeks after enrollment
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Document quality assessment
On one study day within 2 weeks after enrollment
Study Arms (3)
CocktailAI & Modification arm
EXPERIMENTALParticipants log into the study web application using a unique ID and their name. For each simulated patient case, they press "Start" to unlock the case record and initiate timing. After viewing the patient information, clinicians use CocktailAI to generate a first draft of the discharge summary. They then review and edit the draft and submit the final document by pressing "Submit." For the discharge referral of the same case, clinicians follow the same procedure. Copy-and-paste from the case record is permitted. This sequence is repeated for six simulated cases.
Control arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants log into the study web application using a unique ID and their name. For each simulated patient case, they press "Start" to unlock the case record and initiate timing. After viewing the patient information, clinicians write the discharge summary from scratch and submit the document by pressing "Submit." They then write the discharge referral for the same case from scratch and submit it. Copy-and-paste from the case record is permitted. This sequence is repeated for six simulated cases.
CocktailAI arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe LLM assistant generates drafts of discharge summaries and discharge referrals directly from the simulated patient records, with no clinician review or edits. These drafts are the unedited first drafts produced in the CocktailAI \& Modification arm (captured before any clinician edits) and are included as a separate group.
Interventions
This study uses CocktailAI, a template-based LLM assistant co-developed by the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, and Fitting Cloud Inc. (Kyoto, Japan). It is designed to extract relevant information from EHRs using LLMs and embed the extracted content into predefined templates. In this trial, the inputs are six simulated patient records (no real patient data). Text generation uses Gemini-2.0-flash-lite. Templates for discharge summaries and discharge referrals are pre-defined by a team member.
The same document templates are provided; however, all LLM instruction prompts are removed in advance. Clinicians manually write the documents, following the template structure, for each of the six simulated cases.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Ophthalmologists at Kyoto University Hospital
- Junior residents, senior residents, graduate students, board-certified ophthalmologists
- Physicians who confirm that they do not routinely use CocktailAI for clinical documentation and provide informed consent after receiving an explanation of the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Kyoto University, Graduate School of Medicinelead
- Fitting Cloud Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine 54 Shogoin, Kawahara, Sakyo
Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 2, 2025
First Posted
September 22, 2025
Study Start
February 18, 2025
Primary Completion
March 14, 2025
Study Completion
July 16, 2025
Last Updated
September 22, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09