NCT07396298

Brief Summary

Although research evidence is emerging on the co-existence of a positive caregiving experience in the physically and psychosocially taxing dementia care context, little attention has been paid to promoting the positive aspects of caregiving (PAC) among family carers. We adopt the paradigm of existential positive psychology, integrating cognitive behavioural theory, construal level theory, and Antonovsky's theory of salutogenesis to develop an existential-cognitive intervention to enhance positive aspects of caregiving (EXCITE-PAC), and thereby improve the health outcomes of family carers of people living with dementia (PLwD). A randomised controlled trial is proposed to evaluate the effects of EXCITE-PAC on carers' health and to examine whether any such effects are mediated through changes in PAC. Post-trial interviews with carers will further elucidate their experiences of the intervention and their perceptions of its impact. The proposed study will yield important theoretical and public health advances. Theoretically, it will test the validity of an integrative paradigm designed to enrich the life space of family carers in the context of dementia care by increasing their opportunities to experience PAC. If supported, this paradigm can complement the dominant stress-coping framework and help reshape the caregiving experience of family carers of PLwD. From a public health perspective, if EXCITE-PAC proves effective, it will respond to the WHO Global Action Plan on Dementia by promoting carers' health. Crucially, by enriching carers' PAC through empowering them to internalise a new perspective on dementia caregiving, the intervention has the potential to foster more sustainable and evolving positive effects on role adaptation and health status. Together with a comprehensive evaluation of outcomes and end-user experiences, the knowledge generated from this study can be readily translated into dementia care service development and policy. This is a pilot mixed-method study comprising a randomised controlled trial and a post-trial qualitative interview. The inclusion criteria are: i) family carers of Chinese PLwDs diagnosed at least six months previously; ii) caregiving for ≥ 4 hours/day; iii) Chinese-speaking; iv) have a mobile device to access virtual meetings via Go-To-Meeting or Zoom; and iv) consent to participate. After the baseline outcome evaluation, they will be randomised to receive the 12-week EXCITE-PAC program or usual care. The program comprises three phases, including i) face-to-face home visit, ii) group-based virtual meetings, and iii) telephone follow-ups. The outcome evaluation on i) PAC, ii) Health-related quality of life (HRQoL), iii) depression, iv) self-efficacy in caregiving, and v) meaning-making upon programme completion will be assessed at baseline, in the 12th and 18th weeks. Qualitative interviews will be conducted.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
304

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
22mo left

Started Sep 2026

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 14, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 9, 2026

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 15, 2026

Expected
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2027

1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2028

Last Updated

July 31, 2026

Status Verified

July 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

December 14, 2025

Last Update Submit

July 30, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Positive aspect of caregivingdementia caregiverexistential-cognitive intervention

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • The Positive Aspect of Caregiving Instrument

    To evaluate self-affirmation and outlook on life. It is a 5-point Likert scale, with higher total scores (ranging from 11-55) indicating a more positive perception of the caregiving role.

    Baseline (T0), Up to 12 weeks (T1), up to 24 weeks (T2), up to 36 weeks (T3).

  • The Caregiving Self-Efficacy Scale

    To evaluate self-efficacy of carers in managing disturbing behaviour, controlling upsetting thoughts and obtaining a respite in caring for of the PLwD, with higher scores representing greater self-confidence. It is a 15-item tool used to assess caregivers' confidence in managing caregiving situations, rated on a 0-100 scale. Higher score indicate stronger self-efficacy.

    Baseline (T0), Up to 12 weeks (T1), up to 24 weeks (T2), up to 36 weeks (T3).

  • The Meaning-Focused Coping Scale

    To evaluate meaning-focused coping, including changes in situational and global beliefs, goals, meaning making, long-term prevention strategies, rational resource use, acceptance and heuristic thinking. It is a 26-items tool using a 7-point Likert scale, higher scores indicating a higher level of meaning-focused coping.

    Baseline (T0), Up to 12 weeks (T1), up to 24 weeks (T2), up to 36 weeks (T3).

  • The 10-item Centre of Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale

    To evaluate affective symptoms reflecting depression on an ascending 4-point scale of increasing severity.

    Baseline (T0), Up to 12 weeks (T1), up to 24 weeks (T2), up to 36 weeks (T3).

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Health Survey

    Baseline (T0), Up to 12 weeks (T1), up to 24 weeks (T2), up to 36 weeks (T3).

  • Positive Affect Index

    Baseline (T0), Up to 12 weeks (T1), up to 24 weeks (T2), up to 36 weeks (T3).

  • The Intrinsic Motivations to Care

    Baseline (T0), Up to 12 weeks (T1), up to 24 weeks (T2), up to 36 weeks (T3).

Study Arms (2)

Experimental : EXCITE-PAC program

EXPERIMENTAL

The EXCITE-PAC program is an overall 12-week training and comprises of three phases as follows: 1. Face-to-face home visit (week 1) - it will commence with a home visit to establish narrative-based caregiver biographies. 2. Group-based virtual meetings (Weeks 2-8), Over the next 7 weeks, weekly virtual group-based meetings will be held during which video-guided self-distancing cognitive reappraisal will be used to enhance emotional regulation and meaning-making. The goal-oriented empowerment approach will be used in the virtual meetings to facilitate carers' use of reframing and refocusing techniques in the day-to-day caregiving process to promote the evolvement of PAC. 3. telephone follow-ups (Weeks 10-12) - Thereafter, two bi-weekly telephone calls will be made to continue supporting goal attainment.

Other: existential-cognitive intervention to enhance PAC

Usual care

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Usual care will be provided to the control group which mainly covers the social activities offered by the affiliated center. The participants are requested not to join any activities relating to cognitive training or auditory training before the post-test data collection.

Other: Usual care

Interventions

The EXCITE-PAC program is an overall 12-week training and comprises of three phases as follows: 1. Face-to-face home visit (week 1) - it will commence with a home visit to establish narrative-based caregiver biographies. 2. Group-based virtual meetings (Weeks 2-8), Over the next 7 weeks, weekly virtual group-based meetings will be held during which video-guided self-distancing cognitive reappraisal will be used to enhance emotional regulation and meaning-making. The goal-oriented empowerment approach will be used in the virtual meetings to facilitate carers' use of reframing and refocusing techniques in the day-to-day caregiving process to promote the evolvement of PAC. 3. telephone follow-ups (Weeks 10-12) - Thereafter, two bi-weekly telephone calls will be made to continue supporting goal attainment.

Experimental : EXCITE-PAC program

Usual care will be provided to the control group which mainly covers the social activities offered by the affiliated center. The participants are requested not to join any activities relating to cognitive training or auditory training before the post-test data collection.

Usual care

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • family carers of Chinese PLwDs diagnosed at least six months previously
  • caregiving for ≥ 4 hours/day
  • Chinese-speaking
  • have a mobile device to access virtual meeting via Go-To-Meeting or Zoom
  • consent to participate

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The University of Hong Kong

Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Location

Related Publications (40)

  • Younas A, Pedersen M, Durante A. Characteristics of joint displays illustrating data integration in mixed-methods nursing studies. J Adv Nurs. 2020 Feb;76(2):676-686. doi: 10.1111/jan.14264. Epub 2019 Nov 25.

    PMID: 31713252BACKGROUND
  • Elo S, Kyngas H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008 Apr;62(1):107-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.

    PMID: 18352969BACKGROUND
  • Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods. 2008 Aug;40(3):879-91. doi: 10.3758/brm.40.3.879.

    PMID: 18697684BACKGROUND
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1999, 6(1): 1-55.

    BACKGROUND
  • Rosseel Y; lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software 2012;48(2):1 - 36. doi: 10.18637/jss.v048.i02.

    BACKGROUND
  • Singer JD, Willett JB. Applied longitudinal data analysis: modelling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.

    BACKGROUND
  • Lyonette, C., & Yardley, L. The influence on carer wellbeing of motivations to care for older people and the relationship with the care recipient. Ageing and Society, 2003, 23(4), 487-506.

    BACKGROUND
  • Quinn C, Clare L, Woods RT. What predicts whether caregivers of people with dementia find meaning in their role? Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012 Nov;27(11):1195-202. doi: 10.1002/gps.3773. Epub 2012 Feb 15.

    PMID: 22334416BACKGROUND
  • Bengston, V, Schrader, S. Parent-child relations. In Mangen DJ, Peterson WA (eds.), Research Instruments in Social Gerontology (pp. 115-185). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minneapolis Press, 1982.

    BACKGROUND
  • Leung VP, Lam LC, Chiu HF, Cummings JL, Chen QL. Validation study of the Chinese version of the neuropsychiatric inventory (CNPI). Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2001 Aug;16(8):789-93. doi: 10.1002/gps.427.

    PMID: 11536346BACKGROUND
  • Lam CL, Tse EY, Gandek B. Is the standard SF-12 health survey valid and equivalent for a Chinese population? Qual Life Res. 2005 Mar;14(2):539-47. doi: 10.1007/s11136-004-0704-3.

    PMID: 15892443BACKGROUND
  • Amirkhan, J., & Greaves, H. Sense of Coherence and Stress: The Mechanics of a Healthy Disposition. Psychology & Health, 2003, 18(1): 31-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/0887044021000044233

    BACKGROUND
  • Cheng ST, Chan AC. The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale in older Chinese: thresholds for long and short forms. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005 May;20(5):465-70. doi: 10.1002/gps.1314.

    PMID: 15852439BACKGROUND
  • Gan Y, Guo M, Tong J. Scale development of meaning-focused coping. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 2013; 18: 10-26.

    BACKGROUND
  • Au A, Lai MK, Lau KM, Pan PC, Lam L, Thompson L, Gallagher-Thompson D. Social support and well-being in dementia family caregivers: the mediating role of self-efficacy. Aging Ment Health. 2009 Sep;13(5):761-8. doi: 10.1080/13607860902918223.

    PMID: 19882415BACKGROUND
  • Lou VW, Lau BH, Cheung KS. Positive aspects of caregiving (PAC): scale validation among Chinese dementia caregivers (CG). Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2015 Mar-Apr;60(2):299-306. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2014.10.019. Epub 2014 Nov 7.

    PMID: 25488014BACKGROUND
  • Yu DSF, Cheng ST, Wang J. Unravelling positive aspects of caregiving in dementia: An integrative review of research literature. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Mar;79:1-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Oct 16.

    PMID: 29128685BACKGROUND
  • Yu DSF, Cheng ST, Chow EO, Kwok T, McCormack B, Wu W. The effects of a salutogenic strength-based intervention on sense of coherence and health outcomes of dementia family carers: A randomized controlled trial. Age Ageing. 2023 Sep 1;52(9):afad160. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad160.

    PMID: 37659094BACKGROUND
  • Loehlin, John C. Latent Variable Models: An Introduction to Factor, Path, and Structural Equation Analysis (4th ed.). Psychology Press, 2004.

    BACKGROUND
  • Park CL. The Meaning Making Model: A framework for understanding meaning, spirituality, and stress-related growth in health psychology. The Eur Health Psychologist, 2013; 15: 40-47.

    BACKGROUND
  • Hedeker, D., Gibbons, R., & Waternaux, C. Sample Size Estimation for Longitudinal Designs with Attrition: Comparing Time-Related Contrasts between Two Groups. Journal of Educational and Behavioural Statistics, 1999, 24(1): 70-93.

    BACKGROUND
  • Cheng ST, Li KK, Losada A, Zhang F, Au A, Thompson LW, Gallagher-Thompson D. The effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions for informal dementia caregivers: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Aging. 2020 Feb;35(1):55-77. doi: 10.1037/pag0000401.

    PMID: 31985249BACKGROUND
  • Mittelmark MB, Bauer GF. Salutogenesis as a Theory, as an Orientation and as the Sense of Coherence. 2022 Jan 1. In: Mittelmark MB, Bauer GF, Vaandrager L, Pelikan JM, Sagy S, Eriksson M, Lindstrom B, Meier Magistretti C, editors. The Handbook of Salutogenesis [Internet]. 2nd edition. Cham (CH): Springer; 2022. Chapter 3. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK584092/

    PMID: 36122001BACKGROUND
  • Trope Y, Liberman N. Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychol Rev. 2010 Apr;117(2):440-63. doi: 10.1037/a0018963.

    PMID: 20438233BACKGROUND
  • González-Prendes, A., & Resko, S. M. (2012). Cognitive-behavioral theory. Trauma: Contemporary directions in theory, practice, and research, 14-41.

    BACKGROUND
  • Wong PT P. Existential positive psychology. In S. Lopez (Ed.), Encyclopedia of positive psychology (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Wiley Blackwell

    BACKGROUND
  • Yu DSF, Cheng ST, Chen K, Predicting positive aspect of caregiving in a dementia caregiving context: a longitudinal model testing. International Journal of Nursing Studies. Under review.

    BACKGROUND
  • Yu DSF, Cheng ST, Kwok T. Developing and testing of an integrative theoretical model to predict positive aspects of caregiving among family caregivers of persons with dementia: A study protocol. J Adv Nurs. 2021 Jan;77(1):401-410. doi: 10.1111/jan.14561. Epub 2020 Oct 17.

    PMID: 33068058BACKGROUND
  • Mausbach BT, Coon DW, Depp C, Rabinowitz YG, Wilson-Arias E, Kraemer HC, Thompson LW, Lane G, Gallagher-Thompson D. Ethnicity and time to institutionalization of dementia patients: a comparison of Latina and Caucasian female family caregivers. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Jul;52(7):1077-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52306.x.

    PMID: 15209644BACKGROUND
  • Hirschfeld M. Home care versus institutionalization: family caregiving and senile brain disease. International Journal of Nursing Studies (1983), 20, 23-32. Int J Nurs Stud. 2003 Jul;40(5):463-9; discussion 471-2. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7489(03)00063-4. No abstract available.

    PMID: 12828966BACKGROUND
  • Cohen CA, Gold DP, Shulman KI, Zucchero CA. Positive aspects in caregiving: An overlooked variable in research. Canadian Journal of Aging 1994; 13:378-391.

    BACKGROUND
  • Rapp SR, Chao D. Appraisals of strain and of gain: Effects on psychological wellbeing of caregivers of dementia patients. Aging and Mental Health 2000; 4:142-147.

    BACKGROUND
  • Williams IC. Emotional health of black and white dementia caregivers: a contextual examination. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2005 Nov;60(6):P287-P295. doi: 10.1093/geronb/60.6.p287.

    PMID: 16260702BACKGROUND
  • Narayan S, Lewis M, Tornatore J, Hepburn K, Corcoran-Perry S. Subjective responses to caregiving for a spouse with dementia. J Gerontol Nurs. 2001 Mar;27(3):19-28. doi: 10.3928/0098-9134-20010301-05.

    PMID: 11915254BACKGROUND
  • Andren S, Elmstahl S. Family caregivers' subjective experiences of satisfaction in dementia care: aspects of burden, subjective health and sense of coherence. Scand J Caring Sci. 2005 Jun;19(2):157-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2005.00328.x.

    PMID: 15877641BACKGROUND
  • Valimaki TH, Martikainen JA, Hongisto K, Vaatainen S, Sintonen H, Koivisto AM. Impact of Alzheimer's disease on the family caregiver's long-term quality of life: results from an ALSOVA follow-up study. Qual Life Res. 2016 Mar;25(3):687-97. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1100-x. Epub 2015 Sep 9.

    PMID: 26350541BACKGROUND
  • Shin JH, Kim JH. Family Caregivers of People with Dementia Associate with Poor Health-Related Quality of Life: A Nationwide Population-Based Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 5;19(23):16252. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316252.

    PMID: 36498333BACKGROUND
  • Papastavrou E, Kalokerinou A, Papacostas SS, Tsangari H, Sourtzi P. Caring for a relative with dementia: family caregiver burden. J Adv Nurs. 2007 Jun;58(5):446-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04250.x. Epub 2007 Apr 17.

    PMID: 17442030BACKGROUND
  • Global action plan on the public health response to dementia 2017-2025. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.

    BACKGROUND
  • Alzhimer disease international. Dementia statistics. Access from https://www.alzint.org/about/dementia-facts-figures/dementia-statistics/ on 27th Sept 2023

    BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • YU YU, RN, PhD, FHKAN, FAAN, FGSA

    The University of Hong Kong

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

YU Sau Fung, RN, PhD, FHKAN, FAAN, FGSA

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The pilot randomized controlled trial will be conducted in two elderly community centers of a non-government organization in Hong Kong. Participants will be randomized into intervention group and control group.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The EXCITE-PAC program is an overall 12-week training and comprises of three phases as follows: 1. Face-to-face home visit (week 1) - it will commence with a home visit to establish narrative-based caregiver biographies. 2. Group-based virtual meetings (Weeks 2-8), Over the next 7 weeks, weekly virtual group-based meetings will be held during which video-guided self-distancing cognitive reappraisal will be used to enhance emotional regulation and meaning-making. The goal-oriented empowerment approach will be used in the virtual meetings to facilitate carers' use of reframing and refocusing techniques in the day-to-day caregiving process to promote the evolvement of PAC. 3. telephone follow-ups (Weeks 10-12) - Thereafter, two bi-weekly telephone calls will be made to continue supporting goal attainment.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Proferssor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 14, 2025

First Posted

February 9, 2026

Study Start (Estimated)

September 15, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2028

Last Updated

July 31, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

There is not a plan to make individual participant data (IPD) available.

Locations