ENACT Program on Auditory Perception and Function, Cognitive Function and Health-related Quality of Life
The Effect of the "Empowerment Network for Auditory-Cognitive Training (ENACT) Program" on Auditory Perception and Function, Cognitive Function and Health-related Quality of Life of Persons Living With Mild Cognitive Impairment
1 other identifier
interventional
62
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Although previous studies indicated that tackling hearing loss may have a secondary benefit in improving cognitive function and delaying the onset of dementia, a more integrated care approach to optimize both hearing and cognitive function may be needed for individuals who already developed cognitive decline. To address the dual care needs for PwMCI and hearing impairment, it may be possible to integrate auditory training into cognitive training, as both of them are activity-based and focus on increasing the attention and working memory of an individual to engage in the auditory communication process. Moreover, auditory instruction is one of the core mediums in delivering cognitive training activities. It is highly possible to integrate the auditory training curricular to the corresponding administration process. To tackle the enhanced support need of individuals with dual functional impairment to engage in an integrated training protocol, strategies including a goal-oriented approach and peer support can be integrated to optimize the empowerment network. Including family members in the training is also important, as the auditory-communication process in everyday life would take place in the social interactional context. This is a pilot mixed-method pilot study comprising a randomized controlled trial and a post-trail qualitative interview. A total of 62 participants will be recruited from two community centers. The inclusion criteria include mild cognitive impairment according to Petersen's criteria; with at least one-side hearing impairment as defined by a score of 2- or 3-digit test greater than the norm value on the integrated Digit-in-Noise (iDIN test); has a smartphone to access the online training materials; not received formal cognitive and auditory training in the past 6 months. After the baseline outcome evaluation, they will be randomized to receive the 12-week ENACT program or the usual care control. The nurse-led ENACT program comprises three phases, including i) the goal-oriented health counselling phase, ii) the peer-assisted group-based auditory-cognitive training phase, and iii) the family-engaged active-communication training phase. The outcome evaluation on hearing function, perceived benefit of auditory training, cognitive function, and HRQoL will be assessed at baseline, in the 12th and 18th weeks. Qualitative interviews will be conducted
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 18, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 2, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 4, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2026
December 3, 2025
November 1, 2025
1.3 years
March 18, 2025
November 25, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (9)
Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale -Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog)
Evaluate the cognitive domain function of the patient with dementia (PwD), scale from 0-70, with higher score indicating poor cognitive function.
Baseline (T0)
Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale -Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog)
Evaluate the cognitive domain function of the patient with dementia (PwD), scale from 0-70, with higher score indicating poor cognitive function.
12th week (T1) after baseline
Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale -Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog)
Evaluate the cognitive domain function of the patient with dementia (PwD), scale from 0-70, with higher score indicating poor cognitive function.
18th week (T2) after baseline
The digit span-forward and backward test
Evaluate the attention and working memory of the patient with dementia, scales from 10 to 56, with higher score indicating better attention and working memory function
Baseline (T0)
The digit span-forward and backward test
Evaluate the attention and working memory of the patient with dementia, scales from 10 to 56, with higher score indicating better attention and working memory function
12th week (T1) after baseline
The digit span-forward and backward test
Evaluate the attention and working memory of the patient with dementia, scales from 10 to 56, with higher score indicating better attention and working memory function
18th week (T2) after baseline
Trail-Making Test Part A and B
Evaluate the complex attention, executive function and task switching, with shorter time required to complete the task indicating better complex attention, executive function and task switching function
Baseline (T0)
Trail-Making Test Part A and B
Evaluate the complex attention, executive function and task switching, with shorter time required to complete the task indicating better complex attention, executive function and task switching function
12th week (T1) after baseline
Trail-Making Test Part A and B
Evaluate the complex attention, executive function and task switching, with shorter time required to complete the task indicating better complex attention, executive function and task switching function
18th week (T2) after baseline
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile
Baseline (T0)
Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile
12th week (T1) after baseline
Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile
18th week (T2) after baseline
Revised Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly
Baseline (T0)
Revised Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly
12th week (T1) after baseline
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
ENACT program
EXPERIMENTALThe ENACT Program is an overall 12-week training and comprises of three phases as follows: 1. Goal-oriented health counseling phase (1st - 2nd week) - A nurse consultation will be conducted in the center with the aim to identify the participants' experience of living with the hearing and cognitive impairment. 2. Peer-assisted group-based auditory-cognitive training phase (3rd-8th week) - This phase is led and conducted by the nurse with the focus to provide combined group-based auditory and cognitive training (group size = 6) with support from the trained peers. 3. Family engaged active-communication training phase (9th - 12th week) - This phase is to empower the PLwMCI and their primary caregivers on active communication strategies in the presence of hearing loss. In the 2nd and 3rd phase, the nurse will continue to monitor the goal attainment of the PLwMCI and make additional health counseling and goal adjustment accordingly.
Usual care
PLACEBO COMPARATORUsual care will be provided to the control group which mainly covers the social activities offered by the affiliated center. The participants are requested not to join any activities relating to cognitive training or auditory training before the post-test data collection.
Interventions
Usual care will be provided to the control group which mainly covers the social activities offered by the affiliated center. The participants are requested not to join any activities relating to cognitive training or auditory training before the post-test data collection.
The ENACT Program is an overall 12-week training and comprises of three phases as follows: 1. Goal-oriented health counseling phase (1st - 2nd week) - A nurse consultation will be conducted in the center with the aim to identify the participants' experience of living with the hearing and cognitive impairment. 2. Peer-assisted group-based auditory-cognitive training phase (3rd-8th week) - This phase is led and conducted by the nurse with the focus to provide combined group-based auditory and cognitive training (group size = 6) with support from the trained peers. 3. Family engaged active-communication training phase (9th - 12th week) - This phase is to empower the PLwMCI and their primary caregivers on active communication strategies in the presence of hearing loss. In the 2nd and 3rd phase, the nurse will continue to monitor the goal attainment of the PLwMCI and make additional health counseling and goal adjustment accordingly.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Mild cognitive impairment accordingly to the Petersen's criteria
- With at least one-side hearing impairment as defined by a score of 2- or 3- digit test greater than the norm value on the integrated Digit-in-Noise (iDIN test)
- Has a smartphone to access the online training materials
- Not received formal cognitive and auditory training in the past 6 months.
- Available of primary caregiver in the family
- give consent to participate
You may not qualify if:
- moderate and severe cognitive impairment
- Other sensory impairment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Related Publications (14)
Petersen RC. Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity. J Intern Med. 2004 Sep;256(3):183-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01388.x.
PMID: 15324362BACKGROUNDLaplante-Levesque A, Hickson L, Worrall L. Rehabilitation of older adults with hearing impairment: a critical review. J Aging Health. 2010 Mar;22(2):143-53. doi: 10.1177/0898264309352731. Epub 2010 Jan 7.
PMID: 20056812BACKGROUNDHallberg LR, Hallberg U, Kramer SE. Self-reported hearing difficulties, communication strategies and psychological general well-being (quality of life) in patients with acquired hearing impairment. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(3):203-12. doi: 10.1080/09638280701228073.
PMID: 17852289BACKGROUNDSprinzl GM, Riechelmann H. Current trends in treating hearing loss in elderly people: a review of the technology and treatment options - a mini-review. Gerontology. 2010;56(3):351-8. doi: 10.1159/000275062. Epub 2010 Jan 12.
PMID: 20090297BACKGROUNDJorgensen LE, Messersmith JJ. Impact of Aging and Cognition on Hearing Assistive Technology Use. Semin Hear. 2015 Aug;36(3):162-74. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1555119.
PMID: 27516716BACKGROUNDGallagher NE, Woodside JV. Factors Affecting Hearing Aid Adoption and Use: A Qualitative Study. J Am Acad Audiol. 2018 Apr;29(4):300-312. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16148.
PMID: 29664724BACKGROUNDZheng H, Wong LLN, Hickson L. Barriers to hearing aid adoption among older adults in mainland China. Int J Audiol. 2023 Sep;62(9):814-825. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2022.2105263. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
PMID: 35997572BACKGROUNDBucholc M, Bauermeister S, Kaur D, McClean PL, Todd S. The impact of hearing impairment and hearing aid use on progression to mild cognitive impairment in cognitively healthy adults: An observational cohort study. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2022 Feb 22;8(1):e12248. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12248. eCollection 2022.
PMID: 35229022BACKGROUNDDawes P, Wolski L, Himmelsbach I, Regan J, Leroi I. Interventions for hearing and vision impairment to improve outcomes for people with dementia: a scoping review. Int Psychogeriatr. 2019 Feb;31(2):203-221. doi: 10.1017/S1041610218000728. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
PMID: 30244688BACKGROUNDChen L, Zhou R. Does self-reported hearing difficulty decrease older adults' cognitive and physical functioning? The mediating role of social isolation. Maturitas. 2020 Nov;141:53-58. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2020.06.011. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
PMID: 33036703BACKGROUNDMitchell AJ, Shiri-Feshki M. Rate of progression of mild cognitive impairment to dementia--meta-analysis of 41 robust inception cohort studies. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2009 Apr;119(4):252-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2008.01326.x. Epub 2008 Feb 18.
PMID: 19236314BACKGROUNDLawrence BJ, Jayakody DMP, Bennett RJ, Eikelboom RH, Gasson N, Friedland PL. Hearing Loss and Depression in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Gerontologist. 2020 Apr 2;60(3):e137-e154. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz009.
PMID: 30835787BACKGROUNDDalton DS, Cruickshanks KJ, Klein BE, Klein R, Wiley TL, Nondahl DM. The impact of hearing loss on quality of life in older adults. Gerontologist. 2003 Oct;43(5):661-8. doi: 10.1093/geront/43.5.661.
PMID: 14570962BACKGROUNDSim J, Lewis M. The size of a pilot study for a clinical trial should be calculated in relation to considerations of precision and efficiency. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Mar;65(3):301-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.07.011. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
PMID: 22169081RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
SAU FUNG DORIS YU, PhD
HKU School of Nursing
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The pilot randomized controlled trial will be conducted in two elderly community centers of a non-government organization in Hong Kong. Participants will be randomized into intervention group and control group.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 18, 2025
First Posted
May 2, 2025
Study Start
June 4, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Last Updated
December 3, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
There is not a plan to make individual participant data (IPD) available.