NCT07714681

Brief Summary

  1. 1.To determine an effective decision rule for delivering brief mindfulness prompts as a function of caregivers' real-time stress state, including whether prompt delivery affects subsequent stress and affect and whether this effect varies by stress state at the decision point.
  2. 2.To determine an effective JITAI decision rule to deliver a brief mindfulness intervention depending the current state of stress of caregivers and to examine if the adaptive model of machine learning algorithm generate higher receptivity of the brief intervention than the static and control model at the end of the four weeks.
  3. 3.To evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of the brief mindfulness just-in-time adaptive intervention on perceived stress and related caregiver outcomes.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
195

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 18, 2024

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2025

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 8, 2026

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 20, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

July 20, 2026

Status Verified

July 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

July 8, 2026

Last Update Submit

July 14, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Perceived Stress

    14-item perceived stress scale. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 0-56,with higher scores indicating greater perceived stress.

    baseline and immediately after intervention

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Depressive Symptoms

    baseline and immediately after intervention

  • caregiving burden

    baseline and immediately after intervention

  • Positive Aspect of Caregiving

    baseline and immediately after intervention

  • sleep quality

    baseline and immediately after intervention

  • quality of life

    baseline and immediately after intervention

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (3)

  • Prompt-Specific Questions

    during and immediately after intervention

  • feasibility and acceptability rate of the app

    immediately after intervention

  • mindfulness intervention specific questions

    immediately after intervention

Study Arms (2)

Group 1

EXPERIMENTAL
Behavioral: Group 1 - Vulnerability

Group 2

EXPERIMENTAL
Behavioral: Group 2 - Receptivity

Interventions

In the first phase of the study, participants will be interviewed by a research assistant over the phone with a structured questionnaire on the first day of the study period. They will then receive a four-day psycho-education intervention, during which the study application will be installed on their smartphone. At the end of the fourth day, participants will be asked to use the app for the following 16 days of the micro-randomized trial (MRT). In the 16-day MRT (Day 5 to Day 20), zero to six ecological momentary assessments (EMAs), separated by at least 30 minutes, will be delivered each day (from one hour after self-reported wake time to one hour before self-reported sleep time) to classify whether the participant is probably-stressed or probably-not-stressed using a single stress item. Immediately following each EMA, participants will be randomized to receive a brief mindfulness intervention prompt or no prompt, with randomization occurring only if no brief mindfulness intervention

Group 1

In the second phase, the receptivity of the brief mindfulness intervention will be examined within a just-in-time adaptive intervention (JITAI) framework, comprising distal outcomes, a proximal outcome (engagement with the brief intervention), decision points, intervention options (which notification-delivery model is applied), a tailoring variable (predicted receptivity), and decision rules. In the first four days, as in the first phase, participants will be interviewed with a structured questionnaire and will receive a four-day psycho-education intervention. Over the subsequent 14-day micro-randomized trial (Day 5 to Day 18), notification-delivery models will be randomized at scheduled daily decision points. From Day 5 to Day 11, prompts will be delivered by either a random or a static machine-learning model with equal probability; from Day 12 to Day 18, prompts will be delivered by a random, static, or adaptive machine-learning model with equal probability, with the adaptive model u

Group 2

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • family dementia caregivers aged 18 above
  • family caregiver of an individual with a confirmed medical diagnosis of any type of dementia who has been residing in the community
  • having been providing care for ADLs and IADLs for at least 20 hours per week for at least one year prior to recruitment
  • have a smartphone
  • have moderate to high stress

You may not qualify if:

  • Having participated in any structured mind-body intervention, cognitive therapy, or structured psychosocial intervention in the 6 months prior to recruitment
  • Having acute psychiatric and medical comorbidities that are potentially life-threatening (e.g. suicidal ideation) or that limit the caregivers participation or adherence (e.g. acute psychosis).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The Education University of Hong Kong

Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Location

Study Officials

  • Kee Lee Chou, PhD

    The Education University of Hong Kong

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Randomized controlled trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Chair Professor of Social Policy

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 8, 2026

First Posted

July 20, 2026

Study Start

November 18, 2024

Primary Completion

December 31, 2025

Study Completion

December 31, 2025

Last Updated

July 20, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations