Impact of Snoezelen Intervention and Reminiscence Therapy on Seniors' Emotionality and Anxiety
Short Term and Long Term Impact of Snoezelen Intervention and Reminiscence Therapy on Emotionality and Anxiety and the Dynamics of Their Change in Older Adults in Slovak Elderly Care Facilities
2 other identifiers
interventional
55
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the study is to verify and compare the short-term and long-term effectiveness (retention) of Snoezelen intervention and reminiscence therapy and to analyze the dynamics of changes in the level of emotionality and anxiety of seniors in experimental groups and the control group. The main question is: There are significant differences in the level of emotionality (negative and positive emotional states) and anxiety between the two experimental groups of seniors and the control group of seniors during the measurements (pre-test measurement vs. retest measurement I; pre-test measurement vs. retest measurement II; retest measurement vs. retest measurement II)? Researchers will compare seniors receiving Snoezelen intervention, those receiving Reminiscence Therapy, and a control group without intervention to see if the interventions lead to measurable improvements in emotionality and anxiety. Participants will take part in Snoezelen sessions, take part in Reminiscence Therapy sessions, complete pretest, retest and retest II assessments measuring emotionality and anxiety.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 26, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 21, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 29, 2026
CompletedJanuary 29, 2026
January 1, 2026
1 month
January 21, 2026
January 21, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
The Scale of Emotional Habituation of Subjective Well-Being - SEHP (Džuka & Dalbert, 2002)
The Scale of Emotional Habituation of Subjective Well-Being - SEHP (Džuka \& Dalbert, 2002) was used to examine the short-term effectiveness of the intervention programme. The self-esteem scale maps the frequency of experiencing positive and negative emotions, totalling 10. Negative emotional experiencing consists of six emotions such as anger, guilt, fear, pain, sadness, and shame, positive emotional experiencing consists of pleasure, physical freshness, joy, and happiness. The participants responded on a six-point scale (6 - almost always; 1 - almost never). The total score of negative emotions is the sum of negative emotions, and the total score of positive emotions is the sum of positive emotions (Džuka et al., 2021).
from participant enrollment to data collection after 8 months
The Anxiety and Trait Anxiety Inventory - STAI (Spielberger et al., 1970, ed. Ruisel et al., 1980)
The Anxiety and Trait Anxiety Inventory - STAI (Spielberger et al., 1970, ed. Ruisel et al., 1980), specifically only the anxiety portion of the questionnaire, i.e., the Scale for the Measurement of Anxiety as a Condition, STAI X-1. This is the self-assessment portion of the questionnaire, which maps the degree of current experience of feelings of tension, tenseness, nervousness, fear, and apprehension. It contains 20 statements, some of which relate to the existence of these feelings and some of which relate to their absence. Seniors rated their experiencing on a four-point scale (4 - very, 1 - not at all). We based the norms on those presented in the manual by Ruisel et al. (1980).The result is a total score, which is obtained by summing the values on the scale taking into account reverse scaling. The range of the total score is 20-80.
from participant enrollment to data collection after 8 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Reflection Questionnaire (Ďuricová, 2023)
one month
Study Arms (3)
Snoezelen intervention
EXPERIMENTALThe Snoezelen intervention involved 20 participants in the pre-test and re-test, and 16 participants in the re-test.
Reminiscence therapy
EXPERIMENTALThe reminiscence therapy involved 20 seniors in the pre-test and re-test, and 18 seniors in the re-test II.
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONThe control group did not participate in any of the interventions.
Interventions
Reminiscence therapy included 13 activities (Ďuricová, 2026b). Activities were also incorporated into the daily schedule over a period of four weeks, during weekdays. In the Hriňovčan care facility, one activity was conducted daily (lasting 60 minutes) in the common room during designated morning and afternoon hours. The selection and implementation of the activities were strictly determined and organised. The older adults participated in a group setting, with 20 members. The activities were led by two social workers who participated in training with the author of the programme.
Snoezelen intervention included 28 originally designed activities (Ďuricová, 2026a). The ideas were incorporated into the daily schedule of older adults over a period of four weeks, during weekdays. In Hriňovčan care facility, within the Snoezelen environment, two consecutive activities were carried out daily (with a total duration of 60 minutes), during the afternoon hours. The selection of activities depended on the interests of the older adults. Their application was neither strictly determined nor rigidly organised. Clients participated in the Snoezelen sessions in groups of 5-6 members. The activities were facilitated by trained staff - social worker and instructor of social rehabilitation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- long-term residence in the facility,
- age over 62,
- willingness to participate,
- ability to participate (no severe cognitive or physical impairments)
- mentioned above
- participants who have undergone Reminiscence therapy as part of previous research
You may not qualify if:
- significant physical problems,
- significant mental health problems,
- unwillingness to participate
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Matej Bel Universitylead
- European Unioncollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Hriňovčan care facility for older adults, Hriňová, Slovakia 96205
Hriňová, Slovakia, 96205, Slovakia
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Diana Ďuricová, PhDr.
Matej Bel University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Lenka Ďuricová, doc., Mgr., PhD.
Matej Bel University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 21, 2026
First Posted
January 29, 2026
Study Start
October 26, 2022
Primary Completion
December 1, 2022
Study Completion
September 30, 2023
Last Updated
January 29, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share