NCT07355816

Brief Summary

This clinical study evaluated the effects of different root canal disinfection procedures on postoperative pain. Patients requiring root canal treatment received one of several disinfection methods. Postoperative pain was assessed at 6,24, 48, 72 hours and on the 7th day using a standard pain scale. The aim of the study was to identify which method resulted in the least discomfort. Participation involved a single treatment session and short-term follow-up for pain measurement.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2023

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 13, 2023

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 11, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 11, 2024

Completed
1 year until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 19, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 21, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

January 21, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

November 19, 2025

Last Update Submit

January 13, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Root Canal Therapy,Disinfection Methods

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Postoperative Pain Intensity

    Postoperative pain intensity assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 to 100, where 0 indicates no pain and 100 indicates the worst pain imaginable; higher scores indicate greater pain severity

    6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after root canal treatment

Study Arms (4)

conventional needle irrigation

EXPERIMENTAL

Conventional needle irrigation(CNI) Group: A total of 6 mL of 2.5% NaOCl was delivered in three cycles using a 31-gauge irrigation needle positioned 2 mm short of the working length. Each cycle lasted 20 seconds, followed by a 20-second waiting period. Subsequently, 2 mL of 17% Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid(EDTA) (Imicryl Dental, Konya, Türkiye) was applied for 1 minute, followed by another 1-minute waiting period, and finally 2 mL of distilled water was used as the final rinse.

Procedure: Conventional Needle Irrigation

Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Passive ultrasonic irrigation(PUI) Group: Passive ultrasonic activation was performed with an ultrasonic device (Ultra X, Eighteeth, Changzhou, China) using a 20/.02 tip during the waiting periods used in the CNI group. The ultrasonic tip was positioned 2 mm short of the working length and activated vertically with 2-3 mm strokes without contacting the canal walls.

Procedure: Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation

Sonic Irrigation Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Sonic irrigation(SI) Group: Sonic activation was performed using a polymer tip (Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties) loosely fitted into the canal and placed 2 mm short of the working length during the waiting periods used in the CNI group. The tip was activated by vertical in-and-out motion to induce sonic agitation.

Procedure: Sonic Irrigation

KTP Laser Disinfection Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Potassium titanyl phosphate(KTP) Laser Group: In this group, after shaping was completed, the final irrigation procedure was carried out as in the CNI group. Following irrigation, the root canals were dried with sterile paper points at the working length. Then, KTP laser irradiation (SMARLITE D, DEKA laser system, Calenzano FI, Italy) was applied in a pulsed mode at 1.5 W power (Ton: 20 ms, Toff: 50 ms). A 200 µm fiber tip attached to the handpiece was inserted 1 mm short of the working length and moved coronally in a spiral motion for 5 seconds. After each 5-second irradiation, a 20-second interval was allowed, and the process was repeated five times. Laser safety protocols were strictly followed, and protective goggles were used by the operator, assistant, and patient.

Procedure: KTP Laser Disinfection

Interventions

Root canals will be irrigated using a conventional syringe and needle technique with standard irrigant solutions. This method relies solely on manual delivery without activation devices.

conventional needle irrigation

Root canals will be irrigated using a sonic activation device (e.g., EndoActivator) to enhance irrigant penetration and bacterial elimination compared to conventional irrigation.

Sonic Irrigation Group

Root canals will be irrigated using passive ultrasonic activation, which uses ultrasonic energy to improve irrigant effectiveness and reduce microbial load beyond manual techniques.

Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation Group

Root canals will be disinfected using a KTP laser following standard irrigation protocols. Laser application aims to provide enhanced antimicrobial effects not achievable with conventional or activated irrigation methods.

KTP Laser Disinfection Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Systemically healthy individuals between the ages of 18 and 65,
  • Adequate mouth opening,
  • Asymptomatic devitaled mandibular premolar with a single root and single canal,
  • Negative response to cold and electric pulp tests and no bleeding at the pulp chamber opening,
  • Able to provide rubber dam isolation,
  • Presence of opposing teeth.

You may not qualify if:

  • Presence of mental or psychiatric disorders,
  • Allergic diseases,
  • Use of painkillers within 12 hours or antibiotics within 1 week before the procedure,
  • Swelling, palpation/percussion pain, or sinus tract before treatment,
  • Presence of a periodontal pocket greater than 3 mm in diameter on the involved tooth,
  • Presence of a periapical radiolucency greater than 5 mm in diameter associated with the involved tooth,
  • Initiation of root canal treatment,
  • Irreparable material loss, root fracture, or crack,
  • Severe mobility,
  • Open apex,
  • Severe root canal calcification,
  • Internal or external resorption,
  • Bruxism,
  • Complaints of pain elsewhere in the mouth or in a tooth,
  • Being pregnant or breastfeeding.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Faculty of Dentistry, Cumhuriyet University, Sivas

Sivas, 58000, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain, Postoperative

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Specialist dentist / Endodontist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 19, 2025

First Posted

January 21, 2026

Study Start

June 13, 2023

Primary Completion

November 11, 2024

Study Completion

November 11, 2024

Last Updated

January 21, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations