NCT05925972

Brief Summary

Hysterectomy is the most common major intervention in gynecology after cesarean section. Indications include myoma uteri, abnormal uterine bleeding, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, chronic pelvic pain, uterine uteri, operated breast cancer, and endometrial hyperplasia. Today, hysterectomy can be performed abdominally, vaginally and laparoscopically.¹ Laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) has several advantages and disadvantages compared to other forms of hysterectomy. Shorter recovery time, less wound infection, shorter hospital stay, and less need for postoperative analgesia can be counted among the advantages. The prolongation of the operation time and the increased risk of urinary complications are disadvantages.² Postoperative pain management can be done with different methods depending on the location of the surgical field, the type of surgical procedure, the patient's need for analgesia, and patient preference. These methods include oral, intravenous or intramuscular medication and nerve blocks. In order to minimize the side effects of opioids used in analgesic therapy such as respiratory depression, nausea-vomiting, lethargy, constipation and itching, and to increase the analgesic effect, the "balanced analgesia" method is used.⁴ With this method, opioids, non-opioid analgesics or peripheral nerve-field blocks side effects are minimized and optimum analgesia is provided. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block, which is one of the abdominal field blocks, was first described by Rafi in 2001.⁶ Hebbard et al. stated in 2007 that ultrasonography (USG)-guided TAP block can be applied more effectively and safely.⁷ This block can be applied more effectively and safely.⁷ This block is antero-lateral, posterior, and oblique It can be done subcostal with three different approaches. TAP block has been shown to reduce postoperative pain after hysterectomy, cesarean section, and colorectal surgery.⁸ Erector spina plane (ESP) block was first described by Forero et al. in 2016 on a patient with chronic neuropathic pain.⁹ The basic technique is performed paraspinally under USG guidance. It is used for postoperative analgesia in breast, thoracic surgeries, hernia repair, dorsal colon, abdomen and hip surgery. In this study, it is aimed to compare the effects of USG-guided ESP block and OSTAP block applications on perioperative pain control in total laparoscopic hysterectomy operations.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
120

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2023

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 6, 2023

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 6, 2023

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 29, 2023

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 15, 2024

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 14, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

February 4, 2025

Status Verified

February 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

June 6, 2023

Last Update Submit

February 3, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Plane blocks

    Analgesic efficacy between ESP and OSTAP blocks will be evaluated by Numeric Rating Scale. Intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption will be compared.

    Intraoperative and postoperative first 24 hours

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Nausea

    Intraoperative and postoperative first 24 hours

Study Arms (2)

Grup ESP

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The group to which erector spina plane block will be applied

Procedure: Plane block

Grup OSTAP

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The group to which oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block will be applied

Procedure: Plane block

Interventions

Plane blockPROCEDURE

Plane block application in laparoscopic hysterectomies

Grup ESPGrup OSTAP

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Between 18-65 years laparoscopic hysterectomy under general anesthesia ASA I-II BMI ≤30 kg/m2

You may not qualify if:

  • local anesthetic allergy coagulopathy infection at the block application site mental deficiency the surgical plan has been changed (complicated/open surgery)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Balikesir University

Balıkesir, 10145, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Medical faculty

Balıkesir, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451.

  • Abdallah FW, Chan VW, Brull R. Transversus abdominis plane block: a systematic review. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012 Mar-Apr;37(2):193-209. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3182429531.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain, Postoperative

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Nazan Kocaoglu

    Balikesir University Medical Faculty

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 6, 2023

First Posted

June 29, 2023

Study Start

March 6, 2023

Primary Completion

August 15, 2024

Study Completion

December 14, 2024

Last Updated

February 4, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations