Analgesic Efficacy of Plan Blocks in Laparoscopic Hysterectomies
Effects of Ultrasonography-Guided Plan Blocks (ESP&OSTAP) on Perioperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Hysterectomies
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Hysterectomy is the most common major intervention in gynecology after cesarean section. Indications include myoma uteri, abnormal uterine bleeding, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, chronic pelvic pain, uterine uteri, operated breast cancer, and endometrial hyperplasia. Today, hysterectomy can be performed abdominally, vaginally and laparoscopically.¹ Laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) has several advantages and disadvantages compared to other forms of hysterectomy. Shorter recovery time, less wound infection, shorter hospital stay, and less need for postoperative analgesia can be counted among the advantages. The prolongation of the operation time and the increased risk of urinary complications are disadvantages.² Postoperative pain management can be done with different methods depending on the location of the surgical field, the type of surgical procedure, the patient's need for analgesia, and patient preference. These methods include oral, intravenous or intramuscular medication and nerve blocks. In order to minimize the side effects of opioids used in analgesic therapy such as respiratory depression, nausea-vomiting, lethargy, constipation and itching, and to increase the analgesic effect, the "balanced analgesia" method is used.⁴ With this method, opioids, non-opioid analgesics or peripheral nerve-field blocks side effects are minimized and optimum analgesia is provided. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block, which is one of the abdominal field blocks, was first described by Rafi in 2001.⁶ Hebbard et al. stated in 2007 that ultrasonography (USG)-guided TAP block can be applied more effectively and safely.⁷ This block can be applied more effectively and safely.⁷ This block is antero-lateral, posterior, and oblique It can be done subcostal with three different approaches. TAP block has been shown to reduce postoperative pain after hysterectomy, cesarean section, and colorectal surgery.⁸ Erector spina plane (ESP) block was first described by Forero et al. in 2016 on a patient with chronic neuropathic pain.⁹ The basic technique is performed paraspinally under USG guidance. It is used for postoperative analgesia in breast, thoracic surgeries, hernia repair, dorsal colon, abdomen and hip surgery. In this study, it is aimed to compare the effects of USG-guided ESP block and OSTAP block applications on perioperative pain control in total laparoscopic hysterectomy operations.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 6, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 6, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 29, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 15, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 14, 2024
CompletedFebruary 4, 2025
February 1, 2025
1.4 years
June 6, 2023
February 3, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Plane blocks
Analgesic efficacy between ESP and OSTAP blocks will be evaluated by Numeric Rating Scale. Intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption will be compared.
Intraoperative and postoperative first 24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Nausea
Intraoperative and postoperative first 24 hours
Study Arms (2)
Grup ESP
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe group to which erector spina plane block will be applied
Grup OSTAP
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe group to which oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block will be applied
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Between 18-65 years laparoscopic hysterectomy under general anesthesia ASA I-II BMI ≤30 kg/m2
You may not qualify if:
- local anesthetic allergy coagulopathy infection at the block application site mental deficiency the surgical plan has been changed (complicated/open surgery)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Balikesir University
Balıkesir, 10145, Turkey (Türkiye)
Medical faculty
Balıkesir, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (2)
Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451.
PMID: 27501016RESULTAbdallah FW, Chan VW, Brull R. Transversus abdominis plane block: a systematic review. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012 Mar-Apr;37(2):193-209. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3182429531.
PMID: 22286518RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nazan Kocaoglu
Balikesir University Medical Faculty
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 6, 2023
First Posted
June 29, 2023
Study Start
March 6, 2023
Primary Completion
August 15, 2024
Study Completion
December 14, 2024
Last Updated
February 4, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share