Comparison of Two Regional Blocks For Pain Treatment After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Comparison of The Efficacy of TAP and TAPA (Thoracoabdominal Nerve Blockage With Perichondrial Approach) Blocks For Pain Treatment After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
1 other identifier
interventional
61
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In laparoscopic cholecystectomies, ultrasound-guided interfascial plane blocks are commonly used for postoperative analgesia. The aim of our study was to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of thoracoabdominal nerve block with the perichondral approach (TAPA) with transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 6, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 10, 2025
CompletedJanuary 10, 2025
January 1, 2025
7 months
January 6, 2025
January 6, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
postoperative analgesic efficacy
NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) was used for pain monitoring. Patients were informed about the NRS assessment for pain. It was stated that a score of 0 meant no pain and a score of 10 meant the worst pain imaginable. After the first assessment hour when NRS \>4 was noted in patients, IV analgesia treatment was started (dexketoprofen 50 mg IV as additional analgesic). If NRS \<4 and the patient did not request analgesic, the drug dose was skipped.
At the postoperative 2nd, 6th, 12th and 24th hours, the patient's request and administrations from the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device, total tramadol dose and the first additional analgesic drug if needed, and application times were recorded.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
presence of nausea-vomiting
the postoperative 2nd, 6th, 12th and 24th hours
Study Arms (2)
group T
ACTIVE COMPARATORAfter general anesthesia induction, TAP block was applied to Group T. TAP block is the application of local anaesthetic agents to the neurofascial space between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscle layers located in the anterolateral region of the abdomen.
group P
ACTIVE COMPARATORTAPA block was applied to Group P. In TAPA block, local anesthesia is applied to two points, the upper part of the chondrium and the lower part of the chondrium.
Interventions
: It was performed under USG guidance using 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine with an 80 mm insulated peripheral block needle. Local anaesthetic was applied between the upper fascia of the transversus abdominus muscle and the fascia of the internal oblique muscle at the midpoint of the distance between the costal margin and the iliac crest in the midaxillary line under USG imaging guidance.
Under USG guidance, 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered between the upper fascia of the transversus abdominis muscle and the lower fascia of the costochondral tissue at the level of the 9th and 10th ribs (arcus costarum) in the midclavicular line with an 80 mm insulated peripheral block needle. Then, 10 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine was injected into the upper fascia of the costochondral tissue and the lower fascia of the external oblique muscle. The block was performed by following the needle path in the ultrasound image.
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
SBU Sultan Abdulhamid Han
Istanbul, Asia, 34668, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dilek M Yamac
Sultan Abdülhamid Han education and research hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The study was conducted using a sealed envelope system. The sealed, opaque, sequentially numbered envelopes were opened by intervention staff who conducted induction of anesthesia and block procedure just prior to surgery. A second investigator involved in the assessment of postoperative outcomes and another investigator involved in data collection were blinded to group allocation.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 6, 2025
First Posted
January 10, 2025
Study Start
January 1, 2024
Primary Completion
August 1, 2024
Study Completion
August 1, 2024
Last Updated
January 10, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share