NCT06768385

Brief Summary

In laparoscopic cholecystectomies, ultrasound-guided interfascial plane blocks are commonly used for postoperative analgesia. The aim of our study was to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of thoracoabdominal nerve block with the perichondral approach (TAPA) with transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
61

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2024

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2024

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 6, 2025

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 10, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

January 10, 2025

Status Verified

January 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

January 6, 2025

Last Update Submit

January 6, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

laparoscopic cholecystectomytransversus abdominis plane blockthoracoabdominal nerve block with the perichondral approach

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • postoperative analgesic efficacy

    NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) was used for pain monitoring. Patients were informed about the NRS assessment for pain. It was stated that a score of 0 meant no pain and a score of 10 meant the worst pain imaginable. After the first assessment hour when NRS \>4 was noted in patients, IV analgesia treatment was started (dexketoprofen 50 mg IV as additional analgesic). If NRS \<4 and the patient did not request analgesic, the drug dose was skipped.

    At the postoperative 2nd, 6th, 12th and 24th hours, the patient's request and administrations from the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device, total tramadol dose and the first additional analgesic drug if needed, and application times were recorded.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • presence of nausea-vomiting

    the postoperative 2nd, 6th, 12th and 24th hours

Study Arms (2)

group T

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

After general anesthesia induction, TAP block was applied to Group T. TAP block is the application of local anaesthetic agents to the neurofascial space between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscle layers located in the anterolateral region of the abdomen.

Procedure: Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block

group P

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

TAPA block was applied to Group P. In TAPA block, local anesthesia is applied to two points, the upper part of the chondrium and the lower part of the chondrium.

Procedure: thoracoabdominal nerve blockage with perichondrial approach (TAPA) block

Interventions

: It was performed under USG guidance using 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine with an 80 mm insulated peripheral block needle. Local anaesthetic was applied between the upper fascia of the transversus abdominus muscle and the fascia of the internal oblique muscle at the midpoint of the distance between the costal margin and the iliac crest in the midaxillary line under USG imaging guidance.

group T

Under USG guidance, 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered between the upper fascia of the transversus abdominis muscle and the lower fascia of the costochondral tissue at the level of the 9th and 10th ribs (arcus costarum) in the midclavicular line with an 80 mm insulated peripheral block needle. Then, 10 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine was injected into the upper fascia of the costochondral tissue and the lower fascia of the external oblique muscle. The block was performed by following the needle path in the ultrasound image.

group P

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

SBU Sultan Abdulhamid Han

Istanbul, Asia, 34668, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain, Postoperative

Interventions

Dental Occlusiontapasin

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

DentistryDental Physiological PhenomenaDigestive System and Oral Physiological Phenomena

Study Officials

  • Dilek M Yamac

    Sultan Abdülhamid Han education and research hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The study was conducted using a sealed envelope system. The sealed, opaque, sequentially numbered envelopes were opened by intervention staff who conducted induction of anesthesia and block procedure just prior to surgery. A second investigator involved in the assessment of postoperative outcomes and another investigator involved in data collection were blinded to group allocation.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups using a computer-generated randomized sequence table with an allocation ratio of 1:1 and a block size of two.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 6, 2025

First Posted

January 10, 2025

Study Start

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion

August 1, 2024

Study Completion

August 1, 2024

Last Updated

January 10, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations