NCT07351383

Brief Summary

This clinical study tested and compared two ways (cold-base technique or "cryoanesthesia" and conventional benzocaine gel) to reduce pain from dental injections in children. Researchers worked with 28 children between 6 and 12 years old who needed injections on both sides of the lower jaw for dental treatment. Each child received cryoanesthesia on one side and 20% benzocaine gel on the other side, in different appointments, and the team measured pain, behavior, heart rate, and blood oxygen levels.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
28

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2025

Shorter than P25 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 15, 2025

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 10, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 25, 2025

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 27, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 20, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

January 20, 2026

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

November 27, 2025

Last Update Submit

January 9, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Topical dental anesthesiaChildrenAnesthesia punctionPain perceptionCryoanesthesiaBenzocaine

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain perception

    Pain intensity was assessed using a validated instrument: Wong-Baker FACES® Pain Rating Scale (Visual Analog Scale): Immediately following completion of infiltration anesthesia injection, the participant was asked to indicate the level of pain experienced using the face scale (0 = no hurt to 10 = hurts worst).

    Baseline: At the time of the anesthetic injection (or needle puncture) at the oral mucosa.

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Heart Rate

    Periprocedural: During the injection anesthetic procedure, from the anesthetic solution injection to the removal of the needle (approximately 45 seconds)

  • Oxygen saturation

    Periprocedural: During the injection anesthetic procedure, from the needle puncture to the removal of the needle (approximately 45 seconds).

  • Patient's behavioral response

    Periprocedural: 45 seconds, from the anesthetic injection to the removal of the needle.

Study Arms (2)

Cryanesthesia. Topical anesthesia using application of ice cones, before anesthesic punction.

EXPERIMENTAL

Ice cones were prepared using sterile, individual-sized latex gloves filled with purified, sterile water. The open end of each glove was sealed and the glove was placed in a freezer (temperature: -18°C to -20°C) for minimum 24 hours prior to use. This produced a textured ice cone of approximately 5 cm × 3 cm suitable for direct application to the infiltration site. 1. The application site (infiltration area on mucous membrane) was gently dried with sterile gauze. 2. The ice cone was applied directly to the area using gentle circular rubbing motions. 3. Duration of application: 60 seconds. 4. Assessment: Observation for tissue blanching (white appearance) indicating adequate cooling.

Procedure: Local Anesthesia (lidocaine hydrochloride)

Benzocaine group: Topical anesthesia using 20% benzocaine, before anesthetic punction.

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Benzocaine 20% Topical Anesthesia Technique: 1. The application site was gently dried with sterile gauze 2. Benzocaine 20% topical solution was applied using a sterile cotton applicator via gentle rubbing of the infiltration site 3. Duration of application: 60 seconds 4. No mechanical removal was performed; anesthetic was allowed to remain on tissue

Procedure: Local Anesthesia (lidocaine hydrochloride)

Interventions

After topical anesthesia (either technique), the clinician proceeded with conventional inferior alveolar nerve block using standardized technique: 1. Patient positioned recumbent in dental chair with mouth held open. 2. Palpation of ipsilateral mandibular condyle by clinician's non-dominant hand. 3. Cheek retracted with non-dominant hand to improve visualization. 4. Long needle (27-gauge, 32 mm) inserted at horizontal level of contralateral mandibular canine, directed toward insertion of lateral pterygoid muscle below maxillary tuberosity. 5. Needle advanced to contact medial mandibular wall (lingual surface). 6. Aspiration performed to rule out intravascular needle placement. 7. Injection of local anesthetic solution (1.8 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine). 8. Needle carefully withdrawn following injection completion.

Benzocaine group: Topical anesthesia using 20% benzocaine, before anesthetic punction.Cryanesthesia. Topical anesthesia using application of ice cones, before anesthesic punction.

Eligibility Criteria

Age6 Years - 12 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Systemic health: No significant medical history or uncontrolled systemic disease.
  • Bilateral dental pathology requiring treatment: At least two teeth (one per mandibular hemiarch) requiring bilateral inferior alveolar nerve blocks for restorative or endodontic treatment.
  • Cooperation level: Frankl behavioral rating scale classification III or IV (positive or very positive).
  • Informed consent/Child assent: Signed informed consent from parent or legal guardian; signed assent from participant (age-appropriate).

You may not qualify if:

  • Acute dental emergency requiring immediate treatment.
  • Known hypersensitivity or allergy to benzocaine or other local anesthetics.
  • Known hypersensitivity to cold (cryophobia or cold urticaria).
  • Significant dental anxiety or phobia precluding study participation.
  • Developmental delay or behavioral disorders limiting communication or cooperation.
  • Current use of medications affecting pain perception or hemodynamic parameters.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Pediatric Dentistry Postgraduate Program, Faculty of Denttistry

San Luis Potosí City, S.l.p., 78990, Mexico

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Ninawe N, Anija CK. Comparative Evaluation of Effectiveness of Benzocaine Gel and Ice for Pain Management in Children during Local Anesthetic Administration by CCLAD: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2025 Jan;18(1):19-23. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3045. Epub 2025 Feb 14.

    PMID: 40110448BACKGROUND
  • Tirupathi SP, Rajasekhar S. Effect of precooling on pain during local anesthesia administration in children: a systematic review. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Jun;20(3):119-127. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.3.119. Epub 2020 Jun 24.

    PMID: 32617406BACKGROUND
  • Lathwal G, Pandit IK, Gugnani N, Gupta M. Efficacy of Different Precooling Agents and Topical Anesthetics on the Pain Perception during Intraoral Injection: A Comparative Clinical Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015 May-Aug;8(2):119-22. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1296. Epub 2015 Aug 11.

    PMID: 26379379BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Anesthesia, LocalLidocaine

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Anesthesia, ConductionAnesthesiaAnesthesia and AnalgesiaAcetanilidesAnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAmines

Study Officials

  • Amaury Pozos Guillén, Ph.D.

    Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosi

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted with 28 patients aged 6 to 12 years requiring bilateral inferior alveolar nerve blocks for bilateral lower arch dental treatment. Each participant received both anesthetic techniques in a randomized order on separate appointments, with treatment allocated to contralateral mandibular hemiarches. Primary and secondary outcome measures included pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale), heart rate, oxygen saturation, and behavioral response (FLACC scale).
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 27, 2025

First Posted

January 20, 2026

Study Start

June 15, 2025

Primary Completion

October 10, 2025

Study Completion

November 25, 2025

Last Updated

January 20, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-12

Locations