Topical Cryoanesthesia Versus Benzocaine in Pediatric Dentistry
No acronym
Comparison of Topical Cryoanethesia and Benzocaine in Pain Perception During Mandibular Nerve Block in Pediatric Patients: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
2 other identifiers
interventional
28
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This clinical study tested and compared two ways (cold-base technique or "cryoanesthesia" and conventional benzocaine gel) to reduce pain from dental injections in children. Researchers worked with 28 children between 6 and 12 years old who needed injections on both sides of the lower jaw for dental treatment. Each child received cryoanesthesia on one side and 20% benzocaine gel on the other side, in different appointments, and the team measured pain, behavior, heart rate, and blood oxygen levels.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Jun 2025
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 15, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 10, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 25, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 27, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 20, 2026
CompletedJanuary 20, 2026
December 1, 2025
4 months
November 27, 2025
January 9, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain perception
Pain intensity was assessed using a validated instrument: Wong-Baker FACES® Pain Rating Scale (Visual Analog Scale): Immediately following completion of infiltration anesthesia injection, the participant was asked to indicate the level of pain experienced using the face scale (0 = no hurt to 10 = hurts worst).
Baseline: At the time of the anesthetic injection (or needle puncture) at the oral mucosa.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Heart Rate
Periprocedural: During the injection anesthetic procedure, from the anesthetic solution injection to the removal of the needle (approximately 45 seconds)
Oxygen saturation
Periprocedural: During the injection anesthetic procedure, from the needle puncture to the removal of the needle (approximately 45 seconds).
Patient's behavioral response
Periprocedural: 45 seconds, from the anesthetic injection to the removal of the needle.
Study Arms (2)
Cryanesthesia. Topical anesthesia using application of ice cones, before anesthesic punction.
EXPERIMENTALIce cones were prepared using sterile, individual-sized latex gloves filled with purified, sterile water. The open end of each glove was sealed and the glove was placed in a freezer (temperature: -18°C to -20°C) for minimum 24 hours prior to use. This produced a textured ice cone of approximately 5 cm × 3 cm suitable for direct application to the infiltration site. 1. The application site (infiltration area on mucous membrane) was gently dried with sterile gauze. 2. The ice cone was applied directly to the area using gentle circular rubbing motions. 3. Duration of application: 60 seconds. 4. Assessment: Observation for tissue blanching (white appearance) indicating adequate cooling.
Benzocaine group: Topical anesthesia using 20% benzocaine, before anesthetic punction.
ACTIVE COMPARATORBenzocaine 20% Topical Anesthesia Technique: 1. The application site was gently dried with sterile gauze 2. Benzocaine 20% topical solution was applied using a sterile cotton applicator via gentle rubbing of the infiltration site 3. Duration of application: 60 seconds 4. No mechanical removal was performed; anesthetic was allowed to remain on tissue
Interventions
After topical anesthesia (either technique), the clinician proceeded with conventional inferior alveolar nerve block using standardized technique: 1. Patient positioned recumbent in dental chair with mouth held open. 2. Palpation of ipsilateral mandibular condyle by clinician's non-dominant hand. 3. Cheek retracted with non-dominant hand to improve visualization. 4. Long needle (27-gauge, 32 mm) inserted at horizontal level of contralateral mandibular canine, directed toward insertion of lateral pterygoid muscle below maxillary tuberosity. 5. Needle advanced to contact medial mandibular wall (lingual surface). 6. Aspiration performed to rule out intravascular needle placement. 7. Injection of local anesthetic solution (1.8 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine). 8. Needle carefully withdrawn following injection completion.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Systemic health: No significant medical history or uncontrolled systemic disease.
- Bilateral dental pathology requiring treatment: At least two teeth (one per mandibular hemiarch) requiring bilateral inferior alveolar nerve blocks for restorative or endodontic treatment.
- Cooperation level: Frankl behavioral rating scale classification III or IV (positive or very positive).
- Informed consent/Child assent: Signed informed consent from parent or legal guardian; signed assent from participant (age-appropriate).
You may not qualify if:
- Acute dental emergency requiring immediate treatment.
- Known hypersensitivity or allergy to benzocaine or other local anesthetics.
- Known hypersensitivity to cold (cryophobia or cold urticaria).
- Significant dental anxiety or phobia precluding study participation.
- Developmental delay or behavioral disorders limiting communication or cooperation.
- Current use of medications affecting pain perception or hemodynamic parameters.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Pediatric Dentistry Postgraduate Program, Faculty of Denttistry
San Luis Potosí City, S.l.p., 78990, Mexico
Related Publications (3)
Ninawe N, Anija CK. Comparative Evaluation of Effectiveness of Benzocaine Gel and Ice for Pain Management in Children during Local Anesthetic Administration by CCLAD: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2025 Jan;18(1):19-23. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3045. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
PMID: 40110448BACKGROUNDTirupathi SP, Rajasekhar S. Effect of precooling on pain during local anesthesia administration in children: a systematic review. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Jun;20(3):119-127. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.3.119. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
PMID: 32617406BACKGROUNDLathwal G, Pandit IK, Gugnani N, Gupta M. Efficacy of Different Precooling Agents and Topical Anesthetics on the Pain Perception during Intraoral Injection: A Comparative Clinical Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015 May-Aug;8(2):119-22. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1296. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
PMID: 26379379BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Amaury Pozos Guillén, Ph.D.
Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosi
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 27, 2025
First Posted
January 20, 2026
Study Start
June 15, 2025
Primary Completion
October 10, 2025
Study Completion
November 25, 2025
Last Updated
January 20, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-12