NCT07346001

Brief Summary

This study aims to examine the effects of added sugar warning labels for sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) on explicit weight bias and body weight attributional judgements. Participants will be assigned to view either control labels or added sugar warning labels applied on SSBs in an experimental store. Participants will shop for beverages in the store and take a computer survey during four visits to the store, spaced approximately one week apart.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
543

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
18mo left

Started Feb 2026

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress18%
Feb 2026Dec 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 6, 2026

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 16, 2026

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 16, 2026

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2027

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2027

Last Updated

April 16, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

January 6, 2026

Last Update Submit

April 14, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Explicit weight bias, mean score

    Explicit weight bias will be measured by survey through seven items. Items will present participants with pairs of antonyms and ask that they select the box between antonyms that they feel best describes their feelings and beliefs about people with obesity: (1) lazy - hard-working, (2) no will power - has will power, (3) good self - control - poor self-control, (4) active - inactive, (5) self-indulgent - self-sacrificing, (6) dislikes food - likes food, (7) undereats - overeats. Response options, which will be presented as 5 boxes between antonyms, will be coded in a categorical 1-5 range, where higher scores represent higher endorsement of a stereotype that contributes to weight bias. Each participant's responses to each item will then be averaged across the seven items to obtain their final score on the outcome in a 1-5 range, where higher scores represent higher explicit weight bias.

    Assessed via survey after exposure to intervention (i.e., shopping task) 2 times approximately 4 weeks apart (i.e., in visits 1 and 4)

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Body weight attributional judgements, mean score

    Assessed via survey after exposure to intervention (i.e., shopping task) 2 times approximately 4 weeks apart (i.e., in visits 1 and 4).

Study Arms (2)

Control label

OTHER
Behavioral: Control label

Added sugar warning

EXPERIMENTAL
Behavioral: Added sugar warning

Interventions

Control labelBEHAVIORAL

The control label will display a neutral, square-shaped barcode. Labels will be placed on the front of SSB containers in the experimental store.

Control label

The added sugar warning will be octagon-shaped and will state "HIGH IN ADDED SUGAR." Warnings will be placed on the front of SSB containers in the experimental store.

Added sugar warning

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • years and older
  • Bought sugary drinks from a store at least once during the past week
  • Willing to attend 4 in-person study appointments

You may not qualify if:

  • Living in the same household as someone else in the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

UNC MiniMart Chapel Hill

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27514, United States

RECRUITING

Study Officials

  • Aline D'Angelo Campos, PhD, MPP

    University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Aline D'Angelo Campos, PhD, MPP

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 6, 2026

First Posted

January 16, 2026

Study Start

February 16, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Last Updated

April 16, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

The Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan will be shared prior to data collection. After data collection and analysis, a de-identified version of individual participant data and the analytic code will be shared through the Open Science Framework (OSF).

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
The Study Protocol and statistical analysis plan will be available by February 2026 (prior to data collection). A de-identified version of the data collected and analytic code used will become available after data collection and analysis and will remain available indefinitely.
Access Criteria
Open access.
More information

Locations