Impacts of Sugar Warnings on Weight Bias
Impacts of Prolonged Exposure to Added Sugar Warning Labels on Explicit Weight Bias: a Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
543
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to examine the effects of added sugar warning labels for sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) on explicit weight bias and body weight attributional judgements. Participants will be assigned to view either control labels or added sugar warning labels applied on SSBs in an experimental store. Participants will shop for beverages in the store and take a computer survey during four visits to the store, spaced approximately one week apart.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 6, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 16, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 16, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2027
April 16, 2026
April 1, 2026
1.8 years
January 6, 2026
April 14, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Explicit weight bias, mean score
Explicit weight bias will be measured by survey through seven items. Items will present participants with pairs of antonyms and ask that they select the box between antonyms that they feel best describes their feelings and beliefs about people with obesity: (1) lazy - hard-working, (2) no will power - has will power, (3) good self - control - poor self-control, (4) active - inactive, (5) self-indulgent - self-sacrificing, (6) dislikes food - likes food, (7) undereats - overeats. Response options, which will be presented as 5 boxes between antonyms, will be coded in a categorical 1-5 range, where higher scores represent higher endorsement of a stereotype that contributes to weight bias. Each participant's responses to each item will then be averaged across the seven items to obtain their final score on the outcome in a 1-5 range, where higher scores represent higher explicit weight bias.
Assessed via survey after exposure to intervention (i.e., shopping task) 2 times approximately 4 weeks apart (i.e., in visits 1 and 4)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Body weight attributional judgements, mean score
Assessed via survey after exposure to intervention (i.e., shopping task) 2 times approximately 4 weeks apart (i.e., in visits 1 and 4).
Study Arms (2)
Control label
OTHERAdded sugar warning
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
The control label will display a neutral, square-shaped barcode. Labels will be placed on the front of SSB containers in the experimental store.
The added sugar warning will be octagon-shaped and will state "HIGH IN ADDED SUGAR." Warnings will be placed on the front of SSB containers in the experimental store.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years and older
- Bought sugary drinks from a store at least once during the past week
- Willing to attend 4 in-person study appointments
You may not qualify if:
- Living in the same household as someone else in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UNC MiniMart Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27514, United States
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Aline D'Angelo Campos, PhD, MPP
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 6, 2026
First Posted
January 16, 2026
Study Start
February 16, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2027
Last Updated
April 16, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- The Study Protocol and statistical analysis plan will be available by February 2026 (prior to data collection). A de-identified version of the data collected and analytic code used will become available after data collection and analysis and will remain available indefinitely.
- Access Criteria
- Open access.
The Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan will be shared prior to data collection. After data collection and analysis, a de-identified version of individual participant data and the analytic code will be shared through the Open Science Framework (OSF).