NCT07290608

Brief Summary

Study using a decision algorithm for the application of an oral anticoagulant calculator in vascular diseases, aimed at validating a clinical decision-support tool for conditions such as deep vein thrombosis, superficial thrombophlebitis, and pulmonary thromboembolism.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
59

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 20, 2025

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 10, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 10, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 24, 2025

Completed
24 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 18, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

December 18, 2025

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

November 24, 2025

Last Update Submit

December 16, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

anticoagulantalgorithmthrombosis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Accuracy of the DOACT Algorithm in Guiding Oral Anticoagulant Therapy

    Accuracy of anticoagulation recommendations Description: Proportion of correct responses generated by the four evaluated LLMs, vascular surgeons, and non-vascular physicians, with and without access to the DOACT algorithm, using standardized clinical vignettes.

    Day 1

  • Accuracy of anticoagulation recommendations

    Proportion of correct responses generated by LLMs, vascular surgeons, and non-vascular physicians with and without access to the DOACT algorithm. All LLM outputs will be generated using the same standardized prompt, following methodological guidance recommended by IBM for evaluating large language models.

    Day 1

Other Outcomes (1)

  • 1. Identification of key clinical elements 2.Response time

    Day 1

Study Arms (3)

DOACT algorithm

EXPERIMENTAL

Use of DOACT algorithm (Dose-Oriented Anticoagulant Calculator for Evidence-Based Decision Tool) to recommend appropriate oral anticoagulant regimens.

Other: DOACT algorithm

No algorithm

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Standard clinical decision-making to recommend appropriate oral anticoagulant regimens.

Other: No algorithm

LLM-based tools

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Use of large language model (LLM)-based tools to recommend appropriate oral anticoagulant regimens.

Other: LLM-based tools

Interventions

Vascular and non-vascular physicians using DOACT (Dose-Oriented Anticoagulant Calculator for Evidence-Based Decision Tool) to recommend appropriate oral anticoagulant regimens-dose selection and duration responding 15 standardized clinical case vignettes representing patients with vascular diseases such as deep vein thrombosis (DVT), superficial thrombophlebitis, and pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE).

DOACT algorithm

Vascular and non-vascular physicians using standard clinical decision-making (no use of algorithm) to recommend appropriate oral anticoagulant regimens-dose selection and duration responding 15 standardized clinical case vignettes representing patients with vascular diseases such as deep vein thrombosis (DVT), superficial thrombophlebitis, and pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE).

No algorithm

Vascular and non-vascular physicians using large language model (LLM)-based tools to recommend appropriate oral anticoagulant regimens-dose selection and duration responding 15 standardized clinical case vignettes representing patients with vascular diseases such as deep vein thrombosis (DVT), superficial thrombophlebitis, and pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE).

LLM-based tools

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 89 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Physicians with residency training in Vascular Surgery or official Board Certification in Vascular Surgery.
  • Currently practicing clinical and/or surgical vascular care in Brazil.
  • Completed the informed consent process (TCLE) and voluntarily agreed to participate.

You may not qualify if:

  • Physicians without formal Vascular Surgery residency and without Board Certification.
  • Physicians not performing vascular clinical or surgical care (e.g., exclusively administrative, academic, or non-assistance roles).
  • Less than 1 year of professional experience after medical school graduation.
  • Did not sign or did not fully complete the TCLE.
  • Large Language Models (LLMs)
  • Free-access LLMs available to the public at the time of data collection.
  • All responses generated using the same standardized prompt.
  • Capable of producing complete, text-based clinical answers relevant to vascular surgery decision-making.
  • Paid or subscription-based LLMs.
  • LLMs requiring institutional licenses, restricted access, or proprietary tokens.
  • Models unable to generate full responses to the standardized prompt.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo

São Paulo, São Paulo, 01.223-001, Brazil

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Gee E. The National VTE Exemplar Centres Network response to implementation of updated NICE guidance: venous thromboembolism in over 16s: reducing the risk of hospital-acquired deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism (NG89). Br J Haematol. 2019 Sep;186(5):792-793. doi: 10.1111/bjh.16010. Epub 2019 Jun 5. No abstract available.

    PMID: 31168834BACKGROUND
  • Vinogradova Y, Coupland C, Hill T, Hippisley-Cox J. Risks and benefits of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in a real world setting: cohort study in primary care. BMJ. 2018 Jul 4;362:k2505. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2505.

    PMID: 29973392BACKGROUND
  • Nielsen PB, Lundbye-Christensen S, Rasmussen LH, Larsen TB. Improvement of anticoagulant treatment using a dynamic decision support algorithm: a Danish Cohort study. Thromb Res. 2014 Mar;133(3):375-9. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2013.12.042. Epub 2014 Jan 7.

    PMID: 24444650BACKGROUND
  • Kakkos SK, Gohel M, Baekgaard N, Bauersachs R, Bellmunt-Montoya S, Black SA, Ten Cate-Hoek AJ, Elalamy I, Enzmann FK, Geroulakos G, Gottsater A, Hunt BJ, Mansilha A, Nicolaides AN, Sandset PM, Stansby G, Esvs Guidelines Committee, de Borst GJ, Bastos Goncalves F, Chakfe N, Hinchliffe R, Kolh P, Koncar I, Lindholt JS, Tulamo R, Twine CP, Vermassen F, Wanhainen A, Document Reviewers, De Maeseneer MG, Comerota AJ, Gloviczki P, Kruip MJHA, Monreal M, Prandoni P, Vega de Ceniga M. Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2021 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Venous Thrombosis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Jan;61(1):9-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.09.023. Epub 2020 Dec 15. No abstract available.

    PMID: 33334670BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Venous ThrombosisPulmonary EmbolismThrombosis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Embolism and ThrombosisVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesEmbolism

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
Single-blind. Investigator was blinded to the intervention assignment.
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Three-arm comparative validation study evaluating the accuracy and clinical utility of the DOACT algorithm versus standard clinical decision-making and large language model (LLM)-based decision tools.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 24, 2025

First Posted

December 18, 2025

Study Start

January 20, 2025

Primary Completion

October 10, 2025

Study Completion

October 10, 2025

Last Updated

December 18, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations