DOACT Algorithm Versus AI-Based Decision Models in Oral Anticoagulant Therapy for Vascular Patients
DOACT
Clinical Performance of the DOACT Algorithm Versus AI-Based Decision Models in Oral Anticoagulant Therapy for Vascular Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
59
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Study using a decision algorithm for the application of an oral anticoagulant calculator in vascular diseases, aimed at validating a clinical decision-support tool for conditions such as deep vein thrombosis, superficial thrombophlebitis, and pulmonary thromboembolism.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 20, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 10, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 10, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 24, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 18, 2025
CompletedDecember 18, 2025
December 1, 2025
9 months
November 24, 2025
December 16, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Accuracy of the DOACT Algorithm in Guiding Oral Anticoagulant Therapy
Accuracy of anticoagulation recommendations Description: Proportion of correct responses generated by the four evaluated LLMs, vascular surgeons, and non-vascular physicians, with and without access to the DOACT algorithm, using standardized clinical vignettes.
Day 1
Accuracy of anticoagulation recommendations
Proportion of correct responses generated by LLMs, vascular surgeons, and non-vascular physicians with and without access to the DOACT algorithm. All LLM outputs will be generated using the same standardized prompt, following methodological guidance recommended by IBM for evaluating large language models.
Day 1
Other Outcomes (1)
1. Identification of key clinical elements 2.Response time
Day 1
Study Arms (3)
DOACT algorithm
EXPERIMENTALUse of DOACT algorithm (Dose-Oriented Anticoagulant Calculator for Evidence-Based Decision Tool) to recommend appropriate oral anticoagulant regimens.
No algorithm
PLACEBO COMPARATORStandard clinical decision-making to recommend appropriate oral anticoagulant regimens.
LLM-based tools
ACTIVE COMPARATORUse of large language model (LLM)-based tools to recommend appropriate oral anticoagulant regimens.
Interventions
Vascular and non-vascular physicians using DOACT (Dose-Oriented Anticoagulant Calculator for Evidence-Based Decision Tool) to recommend appropriate oral anticoagulant regimens-dose selection and duration responding 15 standardized clinical case vignettes representing patients with vascular diseases such as deep vein thrombosis (DVT), superficial thrombophlebitis, and pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE).
Vascular and non-vascular physicians using standard clinical decision-making (no use of algorithm) to recommend appropriate oral anticoagulant regimens-dose selection and duration responding 15 standardized clinical case vignettes representing patients with vascular diseases such as deep vein thrombosis (DVT), superficial thrombophlebitis, and pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE).
Vascular and non-vascular physicians using large language model (LLM)-based tools to recommend appropriate oral anticoagulant regimens-dose selection and duration responding 15 standardized clinical case vignettes representing patients with vascular diseases such as deep vein thrombosis (DVT), superficial thrombophlebitis, and pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Physicians with residency training in Vascular Surgery or official Board Certification in Vascular Surgery.
- Currently practicing clinical and/or surgical vascular care in Brazil.
- Completed the informed consent process (TCLE) and voluntarily agreed to participate.
You may not qualify if:
- Physicians without formal Vascular Surgery residency and without Board Certification.
- Physicians not performing vascular clinical or surgical care (e.g., exclusively administrative, academic, or non-assistance roles).
- Less than 1 year of professional experience after medical school graduation.
- Did not sign or did not fully complete the TCLE.
- Large Language Models (LLMs)
- Free-access LLMs available to the public at the time of data collection.
- All responses generated using the same standardized prompt.
- Capable of producing complete, text-based clinical answers relevant to vascular surgery decision-making.
- Paid or subscription-based LLMs.
- LLMs requiring institutional licenses, restricted access, or proprietary tokens.
- Models unable to generate full responses to the standardized prompt.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo
São Paulo, São Paulo, 01.223-001, Brazil
Related Publications (4)
Gee E. The National VTE Exemplar Centres Network response to implementation of updated NICE guidance: venous thromboembolism in over 16s: reducing the risk of hospital-acquired deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism (NG89). Br J Haematol. 2019 Sep;186(5):792-793. doi: 10.1111/bjh.16010. Epub 2019 Jun 5. No abstract available.
PMID: 31168834BACKGROUNDVinogradova Y, Coupland C, Hill T, Hippisley-Cox J. Risks and benefits of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in a real world setting: cohort study in primary care. BMJ. 2018 Jul 4;362:k2505. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2505.
PMID: 29973392BACKGROUNDNielsen PB, Lundbye-Christensen S, Rasmussen LH, Larsen TB. Improvement of anticoagulant treatment using a dynamic decision support algorithm: a Danish Cohort study. Thromb Res. 2014 Mar;133(3):375-9. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2013.12.042. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
PMID: 24444650BACKGROUNDKakkos SK, Gohel M, Baekgaard N, Bauersachs R, Bellmunt-Montoya S, Black SA, Ten Cate-Hoek AJ, Elalamy I, Enzmann FK, Geroulakos G, Gottsater A, Hunt BJ, Mansilha A, Nicolaides AN, Sandset PM, Stansby G, Esvs Guidelines Committee, de Borst GJ, Bastos Goncalves F, Chakfe N, Hinchliffe R, Kolh P, Koncar I, Lindholt JS, Tulamo R, Twine CP, Vermassen F, Wanhainen A, Document Reviewers, De Maeseneer MG, Comerota AJ, Gloviczki P, Kruip MJHA, Monreal M, Prandoni P, Vega de Ceniga M. Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2021 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Venous Thrombosis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Jan;61(1):9-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.09.023. Epub 2020 Dec 15. No abstract available.
PMID: 33334670BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Single-blind. Investigator was blinded to the intervention assignment.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 24, 2025
First Posted
December 18, 2025
Study Start
January 20, 2025
Primary Completion
October 10, 2025
Study Completion
October 10, 2025
Last Updated
December 18, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share