Pulsed Radiofrequency Versus Hyaluronidase Hydrodissection for Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Comparison of Ultrasound Guided Pulsed Radiofrequency Versus Hyaluronidase Hydrodissection for Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Study
1 other identifier
interventional
56
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency and hyaluronidase hydrodissection in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. This research seeks to evaluate both techniques in terms of pain relief, functional improvement, nerve conduction parameters, and potential complications, in order to identify the more effective minimally invasive approach for managing carpal tunnel syndrome.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 29, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 8, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2026
ExpectedDecember 9, 2025
December 1, 2025
1 month
September 29, 2025
December 6, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Onset time of significant pain relief
The VAS will be used to quantify pain on the scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (extremely severe pain). Onset time will be defined as the day when the VAS score declined by 40% or more
1 month
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ)
1 week and 1, 3, 6 months
Cross-sectional area (CSA)
baseline and then at 1-, 3-, and 6-months
Sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV)
baseline and 1, 3, and 6months post-injection
Study Arms (2)
Group A (PRF Group)
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup A (PRF Group): will Receive ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency to the median nerve at the carpal tunnel.
Group B (HD Group)
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup B (HD Group): will Receive ultrasound-guided hydrodissection of the median nerve using hyaluronidase solution.
Interventions
Hyaluronidase Hydrodissection: The patient will sit facing the examiner with the forearm supinated and semiflexed at 90°, and the wrist placed on the examination couch with semi extended fingers. The injection for a 5 mL volume of HD 1500 IU will be done under complete sterile conditions. A 26-gauge needle will be introduced from the lateral side toward the midline, using the in-plane approach to target the median nerve in the carpal tunnel using the ulnar approach. Ultrasonographic visualization of the needle tip will be continuous, the injection was done gradually, and the needle will be advanced dissecting the flexor retinaculum away from the median nerve via gradual drug infiltration.
Pulsed Radiofrequency: Top neuropole needle 100-mm with a 10-mm active tip will be advanced with ultrasound guidance using the in-plane technique towards the median nerve. Sensory and motor stimulation will be tested when the needle is close to the median nerve. During sensory stimulation (50 Hz; 1-ms pulsed width; 0-3.0 volt), the patients will report paresthesia in the distal fingers. After performing a motor stimulation (2 Hz; 1-ms pulsed width; 0-3.0 volt), contractions of the thenar muscle will be observed. PRF lesion will then be carried out for 6 min, pulse width of 5 MS, 5 pulses per second and 35 volts at 42°C.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults aged 20-80 years
- Clinical diagnosis of CTS with symptoms for at least 3 months
- Electrophysiological evidence of mild to moderate CTS
- No previous intervention for CTS in the affected hand
You may not qualify if:
- Previous wrist surgery or trauma
- Medical history of polyneuropathy, thoracic outlet syndrome, or brachial plexopathy
- Coagulopathy or local infection at injection site
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sohag Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Medicine Sohag University
Sohag, Sohag Governorate, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Resident of Anesthesia, ICU and Pain management faculty of medicine, Sohag University
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 29, 2025
First Posted
December 8, 2025
Study Start
December 1, 2025
Primary Completion
January 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2026
Last Updated
December 9, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12