Radial Pressure Wave Therapy With or Without Parameter Modulation for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.
RPWT in CTS
Effects of Radial Pressure Wave Therapy Modulation in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to evaluate the clinical effects of radial pressure wave therapy in patients with a confirmed diagnosis of mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive radial pressure wave therapy using either a modulated or a constant parameter dosing protocol. The intervention consists of three weekly sessions, and outcomes will be assessed at baseline, 2 months, and 4 months after the first session. The primary outcome is pain intensity measured by the Visual Analog Scale, while secondary outcomes include functional status evaluated with the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire, grip strength, and electrodiagnostic parameters of the median nerve. The study is conducted in the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Service of the Antiguo Hospital Civil de Guadalajara "Fray Antonio Alcalde," and has been approved by the hospital's Ethics Committee.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 27, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 15, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 17, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 15, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 30, 2026
CompletedMay 4, 2026
April 1, 2026
6 months
June 27, 2025
April 28, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Pain Intensity Measured with the Numeric Pain Rating Scale.
Pain intensity will be assessed using the 11-point Numeric Pain Rating Scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain). The primary endpoint is the change in Numeric Pain Rating Scale score from baseline to the follow-up visits.
Baseline, 2 months, and 4 months after treatment initiation.
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Change in Self-Reported Function Using the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire.
Baseline, 2 months, and 4 months after treatment initiation.
Grip strength measured with hydraulic hand dynamometer.
Baseline, 2 months, and 4 months after the first treatment session.
Change in Distal Motor Latency of the Median Nerve.
Baseline and 4 months after the first treatment session.
Change in Compound Muscle Action Potential (CMAP) Amplitude of the Median Nerve.
Baseline and 4 months after the first treatment session.
Change in Motor Nerve Conduction Velocity of the Median Nerve.
Baseline and 4 months after the first treatment session.
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Fixed-Dose Radial Pressure Wave Therapy.
EXPERIMENTALParticipants assigned to this group will receive radial pressure wave therapy using a standardized protocol with fixed parameters of frequency and pressure throughout each session. The treatment will be administered once a week for three consecutive weeks. This group serves as the reference condition for comparative purposes.
Modulated-Dose Radial Pressure Wave Therapy.
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group will receive radial pressure wave therapy with dynamic modulation of frequency and pressure during each session. The modulation will follow a predefined progressive scheme aimed at optimizing tissue response. Treatment will be delivered once a week for three consecutive weeks.
Interventions
Radial pressure wave therapy will be delivered using the BTL-6000 device. Parameters such as frequency and pressure will remain constant throughout each session. Each participant will receive one session per week for three weeks. The treatment will follow a standardized protocol previously established in the literature and based on patient tolerance.
The BTL-6000 device will be used to deliver therapy with dynamic modulation of frequency and/or pressure within each session, following a structured protocol aiming to optimize clinical response.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults aged 18 to 75 years.
- Clinical diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome based on symptoms such as nocturnal paresthesia, numbness in the median nerve distribution, and/or thenar weakness.
- At least one positive provocative test (e.g., Tinel's, Phalen's, or Durkan's test).
- Symptoms present for at least 1 month.
- NPRS (Numeric Pain Rating Scale) score ≥ 4 at baseline.
- Able and willing to attend all intervention sessions and follow-up assessments.
- Able to provide informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Prior wrist surgery on the affected side.
- Prior treatment with radial pressure wave therapy for CTS.
- Diagnosis of polyneuropathy, cervical radiculopathy, or systemic conditions affecting nerve function (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, hypothyroidism, rheumatoid arthritis).
- Severe thenar atrophy or muscle wasting.
- Pacemaker or other implanted electronic devices.
- Pregnancy.
- Currently participating in another clinical trial or intervention study.
- Inability to understand or complete the study procedures.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Armando Tonatiuh Avila Garcialead
- University of Guadalajaracollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Fray Antonio Alcalde
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44280, Mexico
Related Publications (24)
Oteo-Alvaro A, Marin MT, Matas JA, Vaquero J. [Spanish validation of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire]. Med Clin (Barc). 2016 Mar 18;146(6):247-53. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2015.10.013. Epub 2015 Dec 10. Spanish.
PMID: 26683079BACKGROUNDDelgado DA, Lambert BS, Boutris N, McCulloch PC, Robbins AB, Moreno MR, Harris JD. Validation of Digital Visual Analog Scale Pain Scoring With a Traditional Paper-based Visual Analog Scale in Adults. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2018 Mar 23;2(3):e088. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-17-00088. eCollection 2018 Mar.
PMID: 30211382BACKGROUNDFuson RL, Sherman M, Van Vleet J, Wendt T. The conduct of orthopaedic clinical trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 Jul;79(7):1089-98. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199707000-00019. No abstract available.
PMID: 9234889BACKGROUNDZhang L, Yang T, Pang L, Li Y, Li T, Zhang C, Yao L, Li R, Tang X. Effects of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: An Updated Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 28;12(23):7363. doi: 10.3390/jcm12237363.
PMID: 38068415BACKGROUNDZhang H, Zhao W, Jiang M, Song Y. Study on the effect, safety, prognosis quality and application value of extracorporeal shock wave based neural activity in carpal tunnel syndrome patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Mar 13;24(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06285-1.
PMID: 36915105BACKGROUNDMenekseoglu AK, Korkmaz MD, Segmen H. Clinical and electrophysiological efficacy of extracorporeal shock-wave therapy in carpal tunnel syndrome: a placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2023 Feb 17;69(1):124-130. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20220943. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 36820719BACKGROUNDHabibzadeh A, Mousavi-Khatir R, Saadat P, Javadian Y. The effect of radial shockwave on the median nerve pathway in patients with mild-to-moderate carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Jan 25;17(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-02941-9.
PMID: 35078486BACKGROUNDChen KT, Chen YP, Kuo YJ, Chiang MH. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Provides Limited Therapeutic Effects on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 May 19;58(5):677. doi: 10.3390/medicina58050677.
PMID: 35630095BACKGROUNDTornese D, Mattei E, Lucchesi G, Bandi M, Ricci G, Melegati G. Comparison of two extracorporeal shock wave therapy techniques for the treatment of painful subcalcaneal spur. A randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil. 2008 Sep;22(9):780-7. doi: 10.1177/0269215508092819.
PMID: 18728131BACKGROUNDZhang YF, Liu Y, Chou SW, Weng H. Dose-related effects of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy for knee osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Med. 2021 Jan 13;53(1):jrm00144. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2782.
PMID: 33367924BACKGROUNDSimplicio CL, Purita J, Murrell W, Santos GS, Dos Santos RG, Lana JFSD. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy mechanisms in musculoskeletal regenerative medicine. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 May;11(Suppl 3):S309-S318. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.02.004. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
PMID: 32523286BACKGROUNDSchuh CM, Hausner T, Redl HR. A therapeutic shock propels Schwann cells to proliferate in peripheral nerve injury. Brain Circ. 2016 Jul-Sep;2(3):138-140. doi: 10.4103/2394-8108.192520. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
PMID: 30276290BACKGROUNDGuo J, Hai H, Ma Y. Application of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in nervous system diseases: A review. Front Neurol. 2022 Aug 17;13:963849. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.963849. eCollection 2022.
PMID: 36062022BACKGROUNDDymarek R, Ptaszkowski K, Ptaszkowska L, Kowal M, Sopel M, Taradaj J, Rosinczuk J. Shock Waves as a Treatment Modality for Spasticity Reduction and Recovery Improvement in Post-Stroke Adults - Current Evidence and Qualitative Systematic Review. Clin Interv Aging. 2020 Jan 6;15:9-28. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S221032. eCollection 2020. Erratum In: Clin Interv Aging. 2021 Apr 06;16:569. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S313296.
PMID: 32021129BACKGROUNDDe la Corte-Rodriguez H, Roman-Belmonte JM, Rodriguez-Damiani BA, Vazquez-Sasot A, Rodriguez-Merchan EC. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for the Treatment of Musculoskeletal Pain: A Narrative Review. Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Oct 26;11(21):2830. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11212830.
PMID: 37957975BACKGROUNDAuersperg V, Trieb K. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy: an update. EFORT Open Rev. 2020 Oct 26;5(10):584-592. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190067. eCollection 2020 Oct.
PMID: 33204500BACKGROUNDUrits I, Gress K, Charipova K, Orhurhu V, Kaye AD, Viswanath O. Recent Advances in the Understanding and Management of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: a Comprehensive Review. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2019 Aug 1;23(10):70. doi: 10.1007/s11916-019-0811-z.
PMID: 31372847BACKGROUNDWipperman J, Goerl K. Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Diagnosis and Management. Am Fam Physician. 2016 Dec 15;94(12):993-999.
PMID: 28075090BACKGROUNDZamborsky R, Kokavec M, Simko L, Bohac M. Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Symptoms, Causes and Treatment Options. Literature Reviev. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2017 Jan 26;19(1):1-8. doi: 10.5604/15093492.1232629.
PMID: 28436376BACKGROUNDKim JC, Jung SH, Lee SU, Lee SY. Effect of extracorporeal shockwave therapy on carpal tunnel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Aug;98(33):e16870. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016870.
PMID: 31415424BACKGROUNDPadua L, Cuccagna C, Giovannini S, Coraci D, Pelosi L, Loreti C, Bernabei R, Hobson-Webb LD. Carpal tunnel syndrome: updated evidence and new questions. Lancet Neurol. 2023 Mar;22(3):255-267. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00432-X. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
PMID: 36525982BACKGROUNDJoshi A, Patel K, Mohamed A, Oak S, Zhang MH, Hsiung H, Zhang A, Patel UK. Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Pathophysiology and Comprehensive Guidelines for Clinical Evaluation and Treatment. Cureus. 2022 Jul 20;14(7):e27053. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27053. eCollection 2022 Jul.
PMID: 36000134BACKGROUNDHarinesan N, Silsby M, Simon NG. Carpal tunnel syndrome. Handb Clin Neurol. 2024;201:61-88. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-90108-6.00005-3.
PMID: 38697747BACKGROUNDGenova A, Dix O, Saefan A, Thakur M, Hassan A. Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Review of Literature. Cureus. 2020 Mar 19;12(3):e7333. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7333.
PMID: 32313774BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tonatiuh Avila, MD
Hospital Civil de Guadalajara
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participants and outcome assessors (including the specialists in rehabilitation and neurophysiology) are blinded to group allocation. The intervention is applied by a therapist aware of the group assignment, but not involved in the evaluation or data analysis.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chief Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 27, 2025
First Posted
July 17, 2025
Study Start
July 15, 2025
Primary Completion
January 15, 2026
Study Completion
January 30, 2026
Last Updated
May 4, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- From February 2026 to February 2027.
- Access Criteria
- 1. Qualified researchers who have received IRB approval. 2. Prior reasonable request by email. 3. Data will be made available by PDF files or other non-editable formats.
The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the lead author upon reasonable request by email.