Prevention of Delayed Post-polypectomy Bleeding by Endoscopic Sucralfate Spray in High-risk Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
160
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Background: Colonoscopy can detect colon polyps and perform excision to the polyps to prevent colon cancer. However, delayed polypectomy bleeding is one of the complications to be noticed, which has an occurrence rate of about 1-2%, especially large polyps over 1cm with hot snare polypectomy. Colonoscopic clipping was applied for the treatment of bleeding. However, prophylactic clipping after polypectomy was not proved to reduce the rate of delayed polypectomy bleeding. Sucralfate is used for peptic ulcer treatment, which can become a protective layer on the wound to prevent environmental injury. Our preliminary data revealed the endoscopic sucralfate spray could reduce the delayed bleeding rate among general populations. Whether sucralfate can prevent polypectomy wounds from delayed bleeding in high-risk polyps is unknown. Aim: This study aimed to compare the efficacy in reducing delayed bleeding rate between sucralfate administration and prophylactic clipping on high-risk polypectomy wounds. Method: This is a randomized clinical trial. The study will recruit 160 patients. After randomization, 80 patients will be classified into the Sucralfate group and 80 into the Clipping group. The participants will receive an endoscopic survey as routine, and we will enroll all patients who take antiplatelets or anticoagulants with polyp size ≥ 1 cm after hot snare polyp excision. Exclusion criteria include patients with an allergy to sucralfate. If immediate polypectomy bleeding occurs, we will apply standard endoscopic therapy by either local injection of diluted epinephrine, heater probe coagulation, and/or hemoclipping. After then, we will spray 3g of sucralfate powder through colonoscopy precisely on the polypectomy wound in the Sucralfate group, and prophylactic clipping will be placed on the polypectomy wound in the Clipping group. All enrolled patients will be monitored for delayed bleeding for 28 days after the colonoscopy. Expected results and clinical importance: This study is expected to find that the use of sucralfate powder can more effectively reduce the bleeding risk in high-risk wounds compared to prophylactic clips. In addition to promoting the implementation of national health policies and reducing public exposure to the risk of complications, it can also help avoid medical expenses resulting from complications.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Dec 2025
Typical duration for phase_4
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 9, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 2, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 15, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2027
December 2, 2025
October 1, 2025
2 years
October 9, 2025
December 1, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rate of delayed postpolypectomy bleeding
Delayed postpolypectomy bleeding was defined as the need for reintervention or hospitalization, indicating a clinically significant bleeding event
28 days
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Rate of overt bloody stool
2 days
Rate of severe bleeding from polypectomy wounds
28 days
Study Arms (2)
Clipping group
ACTIVE COMPARATORAfter identifying a resectable colon polyp (size ≥ 1 cm), the operator performed a hot polypectomy. Following hot polypectomy, the wound was observed for 30 seconds to detect potential immediate bleeding. Standard endoscopic interventions such as diluted epinephrine injection, heat coagulation, or clipping were promptly administered if immediate bleeding occurred. Subsequently, the patients were randomly assigned to either the Sucralfate or Clipping groups. After allocation, prophylactic clips will be placed on the polypectomy wounds of patients in the Clipping group.
Sucralfate group
EXPERIMENTALAfter identifying a resectable colon polyp (size ≥ 1 cm), the operator performed a hot polypectomy. Following hot polypectomy, the wound was observed for 30 seconds to detect potential immediate bleeding. Standard endoscopic interventions such as diluted epinephrine injection, heat coagulation, or clipping were promptly administered if immediate bleeding occurred. Subsequently, the patients were randomly assigned to either the Sucralfate or Clipping groups. After allocation, 3 g of sucralfate powder will be sprayed on the polypectomy wounds of patients in the Sucralfate group. The powder spray aimed for the full coverage of the polypectomy wound. Six sucralfate tablets (500 mg per Weizip tablet; Yung Shin Pharmaceutical Industries, Taichung, Taiwan) were ground to collect 3 g of sucralfate powder. This powder was then delivered through a functional powder delivery system (7F polyethylene catheter in connection by an oxygen cannula to the air source; propelling power: 1 L/min airflow)
Interventions
3 g of sucralfate powder will be sprayed on the polypectomy wounds of patients in the Sucralfate group.
Prophylactic clips will be placed on the polypectomy wounds of patients in the Clipping group
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients who take antiplatelets or anticoagulants with large polyps (size ≥ 1 cm)
You may not qualify if:
- lacked complete data (serum creatinine, platelet count, and prothrombin time) pertaining to the previous 6 months
- those who did not discontinue or inadequately discontinued antiplatelet agents or anticoagulants
- those who had a known allergy to sucralfate
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (13)
Chiang HC, Chen PJ, Yang EH, Kuo TL, Hsieh MT, Kang JW, Cheng HC, Chang WL, Chen WY, Chiu HC, Lin MY, Hong TC, Chiang CM, Chen WC, Huang KK, Lu MH, Wu MH, Chen CY, Lin XZ, Chuang CH. Clinical Trial: Precise Administration of Sucralfate Powder in Prevention of Delayed Postpolypectomy Bleeding. A Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2025 Apr 1;16(4):e00818. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000818.
PMID: 39836033RESULTChiang HC, Chen PJ, Yang EH, Hsieh MT, Shih IC, Cheng HC, Chang WL, Chen WY, Chiu HC, Kuo HY, Tsai WC, Lo YN, Yang KC, Chiang CM, Chen WC, Huang KK, Tseng HH, Chen CY, Lin XZ, Chuang CH. Precise application of topical tranexamic acid to enhance endoscopic hemostasis for peptic ulcer bleeding: a randomized controlled study (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 Nov;98(5):755-764. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.06.013. Epub 2023 Jun 24.
PMID: 37356632RESULTYe Z, Reintam Blaser A, Lytvyn L, Wang Y, Guyatt GH, Mikita JS, Roberts J, Agoritsas T, Bertschy S, Boroli F, Camsooksai J, Du B, Heen AF, Lu J, Mella JM, Vandvik PO, Wise R, Zheng Y, Liu L, Siemieniuk RAC. Gastrointestinal bleeding prophylaxis for critically ill patients: a clinical practice guideline. BMJ. 2020 Jan 6;368:l6722. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6722.
PMID: 31907223RESULTWang Y, Ye Z, Ge L, Siemieniuk RAC, Wang X, Wang Y, Hou L, Ma Z, Agoritsas T, Vandvik PO, Perner A, Moller MH, Guyatt GH, Liu L. Efficacy and safety of gastrointestinal bleeding prophylaxis in critically ill patients: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2020 Jan 6;368:l6744. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6744.
PMID: 31907166RESULTGutta A, Gromski MA. Endoscopic Management of Post-Polypectomy Bleeding. Clin Endosc. 2020 May;53(3):302-310. doi: 10.5946/ce.2019.062. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
PMID: 31525836RESULTBuddingh KT, Herngreen T, Haringsma J, van der Zwet WC, Vleggaar FP, Breumelhof R, Ter Borg F. Location in the right hemi-colon is an independent risk factor for delayed post-polypectomy hemorrhage: a multi-center case-control study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011 Jun;106(6):1119-24. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.507. Epub 2011 Jan 25.
PMID: 21266961RESULTElliott TR, Tsiamoulos ZP, Thomas-Gibson S, Suzuki N, Bourikas LA, Hart A, Bassett P, Saunders BP. Factors associated with delayed bleeding after resection of large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps. Endoscopy. 2018 Aug;50(8):790-799. doi: 10.1055/a-0577-3206. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
PMID: 29625506RESULTBendall O, James J, Pawlak KM, Ishaq S, Tau JA, Suzuki N, Bollipo S, Siau K. Delayed Bleeding After Endoscopic Resection of Colorectal Polyps: Identifying High-Risk Patients. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2021 Dec 24;14:477-492. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S282699. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34992406RESULTRabeneck L, Paszat LF, Hilsden RJ, Saskin R, Leddin D, Grunfeld E, Wai E, Goldwasser M, Sutradhar R, Stukel TA. Bleeding and perforation after outpatient colonoscopy and their risk factors in usual clinical practice. Gastroenterology. 2008 Dec;135(6):1899-1906, 1906.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.08.058. Epub 2008 Sep 13.
PMID: 18938166RESULTKim HS, Kim TI, Kim WH, Kim YH, Kim HJ, Yang SK, Myung SJ, Byeon JS, Lee MS, Chung IK, Jung SA, Jeen YT, Choi JH, Choi KY, Choi H, Han DS, Song JS. Risk factors for immediate postpolypectomy bleeding of the colon: a multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Jun;101(6):1333-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00638.x.
PMID: 16771958RESULTFerlitsch M, Moss A, Hassan C, Bhandari P, Dumonceau JM, Paspatis G, Jover R, Langner C, Bronzwaer M, Nalankilli K, Fockens P, Hazzan R, Gralnek IM, Gschwantler M, Waldmann E, Jeschek P, Penz D, Heresbach D, Moons L, Lemmers A, Paraskeva K, Pohl J, Ponchon T, Regula J, Repici A, Rutter MD, Burgess NG, Bourke MJ. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy. 2017 Mar;49(3):270-297. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-102569. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
PMID: 28212588RESULTHsu WF, Chang CY, Chang CC, Chang LC, Chen CH, Lin CC, Lin YM, Lee CL, Wu HY, Lee HC, Lee YC, Su MY, Lin LJ, Chia SL, Wu MS, Chiu HM; Colonoscopy Quality Assurance Joint Working Group of Taiwan Colorectal Cancer Screening Program and Digestive Endoscopy Society of Taiwan. Risk of colonoscopy-related complications in a fecal immunochemical test-based population colorectal cancer screening program. Endoscopy. 2022 Mar;54(3):290-298. doi: 10.1055/a-1328-5126. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
PMID: 33271603RESULTZauber AG, Winawer SJ, O'Brien MJ, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, van Ballegooijen M, Hankey BF, Shi W, Bond JH, Schapiro M, Panish JF, Stewart ET, Waye JD. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 23;366(8):687-96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1100370.
PMID: 22356322RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Attending Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 9, 2025
First Posted
December 2, 2025
Study Start
December 15, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Last Updated
December 2, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR
- Time Frame
- after study publication
after publication