A Comparison of Effectiveness of Oral Sucrolfate, Alginate and Hydrotalcide in Dispeptic Pain Treatment
1 other identifier
interventional
300
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Dyspepsia is a very common but non-specific complaint that may indicate a group of symptoms that can be attributed to the upper gastrointestinal system, such as epigastric discomfort, abdominal bloating or fullness, stomach upset and nausea or vomiting that may be associated with food. This study aimed to improve treatment management of patients with complaints of dyspeptic pain and emergency services, and to compare treatment efficacy of oral sucralfate, alginate and hydrotalcite, which are widely used in our country. Literature According to our research, our study is the first study to compare different antacids in our study of emergency serviste dyspepsia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Jun 2017
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 20, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 22, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 25, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 15, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 17, 2018
CompletedAugust 31, 2018
August 1, 2018
4 months
August 15, 2018
August 29, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Relief of Gastric Pain
Compare relief of dispeptic complaint with using VAS (Visual Analog Scale) in 3 groups of alginate, sucralfate and hydrotalcite patients. Patients' pain scores were recorded using 0-100 mm VAS (Visual Analog Scale) to score the degree of dyspeptic complaints. VAS; It is composed of a measured horizontal or vertical line and often carries definitions of "no symptoms" on one end and "severe symptoms" on the other end. The patient is told to mark a point on the line according to the severity of the symptom. The location of the marker allows the severity of the symptom to be measured. The VAS markings on the evaluation forms prepared for the study before and during the procedure were made by the patient himself and regardless of the previous sign. Patients with VAS\> 50 were treated. Patients were observed for 60 minutes in the emergency department and 60-minute VAS (Visual Analog Scale) score above 50 were given to the patient for rescue treatment.
Change from baseline in dispeptic complaint VAS scores at 60 minutes
Study Arms (3)
Alginate
EXPERIMENTAL10 cc of Alginate peroral
Sucralfate
EXPERIMENTAL10 cc of Sucralfate peroral
Hydrotalcite
EXPERIMENTAL10 cc of Hydrotalcite peroral
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Stomach pain, swelling or dispeptic complaints.
- Men and women between the ages of 18-60.
- Patients with VAS\> 5.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy and lactation.
- Sucralfate, alginate, hydrotalcite allergy.
- Emergency service arrives with acute psychiatric symptoms.
- Gastrointestinal system bleedings.
- Chronic renal failure, liver cirrhosis, structural and functional heart disease.
- Gastric malignancy and terminal illness.
- Patients suspected of having a different problem such as ileus, biliary colic,
- pancreatitis, hepatitis.
- Patients who refuse to participate in the study.
- Those who can not use VAS.
- Presence of ischemic findings on the arrival ECG.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Pamukkale University
Denizli, 20070, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gulgun Battal, MD
Pamukkale University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 15, 2018
First Posted
August 17, 2018
Study Start
June 20, 2017
Primary Completion
October 22, 2017
Study Completion
November 25, 2017
Last Updated
August 31, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share