NCT05817656

Brief Summary

Background: Colonoscopy can detect colon polyps and perform excision to the polyps to prevent colon cancer. However, polypectomy bleeding is one of the complications to be noticed, which has an occurrence rate of about 0.4%. Polypectomy bleeding is divided into two types, immediate and delayed bleeding. While immediate polypectomy bleeding can be treated with endoscopic hemostasis during the exam session, delayed polypectomy bleeding occurs a few hours or days after the colonoscopy exam. Patients who encountered delayed polypectomy bleeding usually presented to the hospital for hematochezia, symptoms of anemia, and even hemodynamic instability and end-organ damage. Cold snare polypectomy and prophylactic clipping can reduce the bleeding risk. However, delayed polypectomy bleeding still occurs in high-risk patients, e.g., larger polyps ≥ 1cm. Sucralfate is used for peptic ulcer treatment. It can become a protective layer on the wound to prevent environmental injury. Sucralfate can be used to treat colon ulcers, colitis, and radiation colitis. Whether sucralfate can prevent polypectomy wounds from delayed bleeding is unknown. Aim: This study aimed to investigate whether precise sucralfate administration on polypectomy wounds can prevent the wound from delayed bleeding. Method: This is a randomized clinical trial. The study will recruit 160 patients. After randomization, 80 patients will be classified into the intervention group and 80 into the control group. The participants will receive an endoscopic survey as routine, and we will enroll all patients with polyp size ≥ 0.5 cm after polyp excision. Exclusion criteria include patients with an allergy to sucralfate. If immediate polypectomy bleeding occurs, we will apply standard endoscopic therapy by either local injection of diluted epinephrine, heater probe coagulation, and/or hemoclipping. If there is no immediate bleeding, we will apply prophylactic clipping in high-risk patients with polyp size ≥ 1cm. After then, we will spray 3g of sucralfate powder through colonoscopy precisely on the polypectomy wound in the intervention group. All enrolled patients will be monitored for delayed bleeding for 28 days after the colonoscopy.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
160

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2023

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 5, 2023

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 18, 2023

Completed
27 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 15, 2023

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 14, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 14, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

December 22, 2023

Status Verified

April 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

April 5, 2023

Last Update Submit

December 17, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Polypectomy bleedingSulcralfateColonoscopic spray

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Incidence rate of delayed polypectomy bleeding

    The occurrence of delayed polypectomy bleeding. Delayed polypectomy was classified into standard criteria and extended criteria. Standard criteria of delayed postpolypectomy bleeding was defined as emergency attendance, hospitalisation, or need for re-intervention. Extended criteria was defined as blood in stool two days after procedure with or without spontaneous remission.

    28 days

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Incidence rate of need of TAE or surgery

    28 days

  • length of hospitalization

    28 days

  • all-cause mortality

    28 days

Study Arms (2)

Intervention group

EXPERIMENTAL

After polypectomy with a suitable method, either cold snare polypectomy, hot snare polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection, or endoscopic submucosal dissection, we will monitor if immediate polypectomy bleeding occurs. If immediate bleeding occurs, we will apply standard endoscopic therapy by either local injection of diluted epinephrine, heater probe coagulation, and/or hemoclipping. If there is no immediate bleeding, we will apply prophylactic clipping in high-risk patients with polyp size ≥ 1cm. After then, we will spray 3g of sucralfate powder through colonoscopy precisely on the polypectomy wound in the intervention group.

Drug: Sucralfate

Control group

NO INTERVENTION

After polypectomy with a suitable method, either cold snare polypectomy, hot snare polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection, or endoscopic submucosal dissection, we will monitor if immediate polypectomy bleeding occurs. If immediate bleeding occurs, we will apply standard endoscopic therapy by either local injection of diluted epinephrine, heater probe coagulation, and/or hemoclipping. If there is no immediate bleeding, we will apply prophylactic clipping in high-risk patients with polyp size ≥ 1cm.

Interventions

3g of sucralfate powder through colonoscopy will be sprayed precisely on the polypectomy wound in the intervention group

Intervention group

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • who accept colonoscopy examinations with polyp size ≥ 0.5 cm for polyp excision

You may not qualify if:

  • patients with an allergy to sucralfate
  • patients rejection

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hsueh-Chien Chiang

Tainan, Other (Non U.s.), 704, Taiwan

RECRUITING

Related Publications (21)

  • Wang YW, Chen HH, Wu MS, Chiu HM; Taiwanese Nationwide Colorectal Cancer Screening Program. Current status and future challenge of population-based organized colorectal cancer screening: Lesson from the first decade of Taiwanese program. J Formos Med Assoc. 2018 May;117(5):358-364. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2017.09.010. Epub 2017 Oct 5.

  • Derbyshire E, Hungin P, Nickerson C, Rutter MD. Post-polypectomy bleeding in the English National Health Service Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. Endoscopy. 2017 Sep;49(9):899-908. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-113442. Epub 2017 Jul 28.

  • Kim HS, Kim TI, Kim WH, Kim YH, Kim HJ, Yang SK, Myung SJ, Byeon JS, Lee MS, Chung IK, Jung SA, Jeen YT, Choi JH, Choi KY, Choi H, Han DS, Song JS. Risk factors for immediate postpolypectomy bleeding of the colon: a multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Jun;101(6):1333-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00638.x.

  • Zhang Q, An Sl, Chen Zy, Fu FH, Jiang B, Zhi Fc, Bai Y, Gong W. Assessment of risk factors for delayed colonic post-polypectomy hemorrhage: a study of 15553 polypectomies from 2005 to 2013. PLoS One. 2014 Oct 1;9(10):e108290. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108290. eCollection 2014.

  • Buddingh KT, Herngreen T, Haringsma J, van der Zwet WC, Vleggaar FP, Breumelhof R, Ter Borg F. Location in the right hemi-colon is an independent risk factor for delayed post-polypectomy hemorrhage: a multi-center case-control study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011 Jun;106(6):1119-24. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.507. Epub 2011 Jan 25.

  • Park SK, Seo JY, Lee MG, Yang HJ, Jung YS, Choi KY, Kim H, Kim HO, Jung KU, Chun HK, Park DI. Prospective analysis of delayed colorectal post-polypectomy bleeding. Surg Endosc. 2018 Jul;32(7):3282-3289. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6048-9. Epub 2018 Jan 17.

  • Hassan C, Repici A, Sharma P, Correale L, Zullo A, Bretthauer M, Senore C, Spada C, Bellisario C, Bhandari P, Rex DK. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut. 2016 May;65(5):806-20. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308481. Epub 2015 Feb 13.

  • Shinozaki S, Kobayashi Y, Hayashi Y, Sakamoto H, Lefor AK, Yamamoto H. Efficacy and safety of cold versus hot snare polypectomy for resecting small colorectal polyps: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Endosc. 2018 Sep;30(5):592-599. doi: 10.1111/den.13173. Epub 2018 May 14.

  • Ferlitsch M, Moss A, Hassan C, Bhandari P, Dumonceau JM, Paspatis G, Jover R, Langner C, Bronzwaer M, Nalankilli K, Fockens P, Hazzan R, Gralnek IM, Gschwantler M, Waldmann E, Jeschek P, Penz D, Heresbach D, Moons L, Lemmers A, Paraskeva K, Pohl J, Ponchon T, Regula J, Repici A, Rutter MD, Burgess NG, Bourke MJ. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy. 2017 Mar;49(3):270-297. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-102569. Epub 2017 Feb 17.

  • Qu J, Jian H, Li L, Zhang Y, Feng B, Li Z, Zuo X. Effectiveness and safety of cold versus hot snare polypectomy: A meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jan;34(1):49-58. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14464. Epub 2018 Sep 26.

  • Matsumoto M, Kato M, Oba K, Abiko S, Tsuda M, Miyamoto S, Mizushima T, Ono M, Omori S, Takahashi M, Ono S, Mabe K, Nakagawa M, Nakagawa S, Kudo T, Shimizu Y, Sakamoto N. Multicenter randomized controlled study to assess the effect of prophylactic clipping on post-polypectomy delayed bleeding. Dig Endosc. 2016 Jul;28(5):570-6. doi: 10.1111/den.12661. Epub 2016 May 25.

  • Boumitri C, Mir FA, Ashraf I, Matteson-Kome ML, Nguyen DL, Puli SR, Bechtold ML. Prophylactic clipping and post-polypectomy bleeding: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Ann Gastroenterol. 2016 Oct-Dec;29(4):502-508. doi: 10.20524/aog.2016.0075. Epub 2016 Jul 28.

  • Turan AS, Pohl H, Matsumoto M, Lee BS, Aizawa M, Desideri F, Albeniz E, Raju GS, Luba D, Barret M, Gurudu SR, Ramirez FC, Lin WR, Atsma F, Siersema PD, van Geenen EJM; Prophylactic Clipping Collaborative Group. The Role of Clips in Preventing Delayed Bleeding After Colorectal Polyp Resection: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Feb;20(2):362-371.e23. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.05.012. Epub 2021 May 12.

  • Nagashima R. Mechanisms of action of sucralfate. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1981;3(Suppl 2):117-27.

  • Masuelli L, Tumino G, Turriziani M, Modesti A, Bei R. Topical use of sucralfate in epithelial wound healing: clinical evidences and molecular mechanisms of action. Recent Pat Inflamm Allergy Drug Discov. 2010 Jan;4(1):25-36. doi: 10.2174/187221310789895649.

  • Ala S, Saeedi M, Janbabai G, Ganji R, Azhdari E, Shiva A. Efficacy of Sucralfate Mouth Wash in Prevention of 5-fluorouracil Induced Oral Mucositis: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial. Nutr Cancer. 2016;68(3):456-63. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2016.1153666. Epub 2016 Mar 23.

  • Hunt RH. Treatment of peptic ulcer disease with sucralfate: a review. Am J Med. 1991 Aug 8;91(2A):102S-106S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(91)90459-b.

  • Fernandez OOA, Pereira JA, Campos FG, Araya CM, Marinho GE, Novo RS, Oliveira TS, Franceschi YT, Martinez CAR. EVALUATION OF ENEMAS CONTAINING SUCRALFATE IN TISSUE CONTENT OF MUC-2 PROTEIN IN EXPERIMENTAL MODEL OF DIVERSION COLITIS. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2017 Apr-Jun;30(2):132-138. doi: 10.1590/0102-6720201700020012.

  • McElvanna K, Wilson A, Irwin T. Sucralfate paste enema: a new method of topical treatment for haemorrhagic radiation proctitis. Colorectal Dis. 2014 Apr;16(4):281-4. doi: 10.1111/codi.12507.

  • Kochhar R, Sriram PV, Sharma SC, Goel RC, Patel F. Natural history of late radiation proctosigmoiditis treated with topical sucralfate suspension. Dig Dis Sci. 1999 May;44(5):973-8. doi: 10.1023/a:1026612731210.

  • Chiang HC, Chen PJ, Yang EH, Kuo TL, Hsieh MT, Kang JW, Cheng HC, Chang WL, Chen WY, Chiu HC, Lin MY, Hong TC, Chiang CM, Chen WC, Huang KK, Lu MH, Wu MH, Chen CY, Lin XZ, Chuang CH. Clinical Trial: Precise Administration of Sucralfate Powder in Prevention of Delayed Postpolypectomy Bleeding. A Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2025 Apr 1;16(4):e00818. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000818.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hemorrhage

Interventions

Sucralfate

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ThioglycosidesSulfur CompoundsOrganic ChemicalsSucroseDisaccharidesOligosaccharidesPolysaccharidesCarbohydratesSugars

Study Officials

  • Xi-Zhang Lin, M.D.

    National Cheng Kung University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Hsueh-Chien Chiang, M.D.

CONTACT

Ming-Tsung Hsieh, M.D.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 5, 2023

First Posted

April 18, 2023

Study Start

May 15, 2023

Primary Completion

April 14, 2024

Study Completion

April 14, 2024

Last Updated

December 22, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

After study completed and paper published

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
Time Frame
10 years

Locations